AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
I GRADE
I AFSN/SSAN
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
TYPE GEN
1
I
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
__L
MEMBER SITTING
I 1 x
1 RECORDREVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANlZATlON OF COUNSEL
T'
- . . - . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t -
A93.23
I
IYDEY NL'HBER
- - -
.-
- -
A66.00
1
2
3
~
~
HEARING DATE
11 Aug 2004
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00164
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
-
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
N
FILE
L
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAI. APPEARANCE
R
~
--
O
N
E
---
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
I
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
I
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
I
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAI, RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00164
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.
Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was based on one incident in 59 months of
service. Applicant was discharged for drug abuse after he received an Article 15 for wrongful use of
marijuana when a urinalysis came back containing THC above the DoD cut-off of 15 nglml, specifically 37
ngiml. Applicant feels a general discharge was too harsh for this offense. The Board noted the Air Force's
drug policy was well publicized and members were continually made aware that illegal drug use was not
tolerated. Marijuana use is viewed as a very serious failure to meet Air Force standards and thus the
characterization of service member received is warranted and appropriate due to that misconduct. The Board
could find no inequity or impropriety on which to suggest a basis to upgrade the discharge.
Issue 2. Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the
service. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports,
letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct
offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was
appropriate for the reasons which were its basis.
Issue 3. Applicant contends he was suffering from depression as a result of the death of a best friend, serious
illness of his mother, and death of his first child, all within a short period of time. It was in this context and
due to peer pressure that applicant claims he succumbed to the temptation of using marijuana. At the time of
the discharge, member consulted counsel and they requested a retention waiver, claiming that member's
drug use was experimental. But he had admitted three instances of pre-service marijuana use which
discredited the claim that he was an experimenter. Furthermore, there is no evidence in the record that
member sought help from any base agencies such as the chaplain, life skills clinic, family support center, or
chain of command for his purported depression. While it is understandable that someone experiencing
personal problems has additional stress, the Board did not find them of sufficient mitigation to warrant an
upgrade.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE R W I E W BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former A1C) (HGH SFLA)
FD2004-00164
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Lackland AFB, TX on 30 Jun 03
UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.54 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 7 Apr 79. Enlmt Age: 19 2/12. Disch Age: 24 2/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-72, E-32, G-39, M-16. PAFSC: 3P051 - Security Forces Journeyman.
DAS: 30 May 02.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 9 Jun 98 - 28 Jul 98 (1 month 20 days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REXIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 29 Jul 98 for 4 yrs. Extended 17 Dec 01 for 23 months.
Svd: 4 Yrs 11 Mo 2 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: A1C - 25 Apr 03 (Article 15, 25 Apr 03)
SrA - 29 Jul 01
A1C - 29 NOV 99
A m - 29 Jan 99
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 25 Apr 03, Lackland AFB, TX - Article 112a. You, did,
between on or about 1 Feb 03, and on or about 26 Feb 03,
wrongfully use marijuana. Reduction to AlC. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
e. Additional: None.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: 29 Jul 98 - 28 Mar 00 Randolph AFB 5 (Initial)
29 Mar 00 - 28 Mar 01 Randolph AFB 5 (Annual)
29 Mar 01 - 28 Mar 02 Randolph AFB 5 (Annual)
29 Mar 02 - 26 Feb 03 Lackland AFB 5 (CRO)
h. Awards & Decs: AFAM, AFOUA ~ / 1 OLC, NDSM, AFEM, AFLSAR, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (5) Yrs (0) Mos (22) Das
TAMS: (4) Yrs (11) Mos (2) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 11 Feb 04.
I
i
1
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Issues.
7 . SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS (X as a9icable) (Please pnnt name and Social Seem Number on aach obcument.)
7
WILL NOT BE SUBMTTTED. PLEASE COMPETE REVIEW BASED ON AVAILABLE SERVICE RECORDS.
ARE LISTED BELOW AND ARE ATTACHED TO THIS APPLICATION: (Contlne on a plah sheet o f p p e r # m sp8ce/s needed.)
a. DOCUMENT 1:
b. DOCUMENT 2:
c. DOCUMENT 3:
'
.:
.. " .
. . .
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
,
, . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ... .- . - .
.
. . . . . . .
,,.
.
.
.
. , -
.
J
.
. .
'., 1 ' ,
,
. - . . '
... .... -,. . .>-
.-,,.
....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. . . . . . *"*- .. -.
-
. -
.:.:
.
.
I The Board will consider any issue submitted by you prim to closing the case for deliberation The Board will also review the case to
, determine whether there are any issues that piovide a basis for upgradiG your discharger HovGever: the Board is not required to tespond in
writing to issues.of concern ,to you unless those issues are listed or incorporated by specific reference below. Carefully read the instructions
that pertain to Block 8 prior to completing @is part of the application. !f you need nipre-space, submit additional issuesoy an attachment.
-- 1 - -, - -- - - -- - - - ---,-
-- - -- -, - - -, - - - - - - - - - ,, -- - - - -- -- - - - ,-, - -=, , -, , - -:I,- - -L -222 L~---:.=L*~>L-
- - - -
-. .. ---... . - . . . . -
v
, '- \ . :,: T
c"""-"*%2-*.--....%*
. t : r . ~ -
t,
r-
,"I :- : -. ;.+-
-:hl . p , h , : f
- %,
"+?2
-
I
r
. .,
. -
- -
-
8 ."- -.\
. .L"'LI'
C
i
-4F-TP. ;
i r .
. i - ' L ' . : -
,
-
.
l - u ~ f s ' ~ AN A~ACHMENT TO TYS A P P W I O N . , , ,
I HA& W E D ADDITIONAL
.--,.-&. <%. -.
SUI~MI&D+AN APPLICATION ON (Ehter'da'te)
- a -.- - * ? - A
t P&uSLY
AND AM COMPLETING THIS FORM IN ORDER TO SUBMIT ADDmONAL ISSUES ;:
. *, ,
. - -
.-- L -
.-I. i;..
.
.
i'.
.
&, 2."
-
,
,
-
- --- -
'
.
........
- - -
............................
I*.
z , ,
I
+
...
This letter is being submitted on behalfof
and it is in
suppod of having my d t a r y records corrected. If my records are ava-ilable To Whom It
May Concern, please look them over and base your decisions accordingly. 1 was informed
that the Veterans f i k s office could assist me with this type of action, but the phone caIls
that were made to the VA representatives were not returned, so I am taking the liberty of
typing my own letter on my behalf in hopes that whoever reads this will understand the
reasoning behind me doing so. I feel as though this discharge that I received fi-om the Air
Force is the only thing keeping me from becoming a legaimate part of society- 1 believe
that my misconduct was due to life changing events, and my purpose of this request is to
attempt to receive a discharge t M reflects my work ethic and also c b t & e s what type
of individual I am.
There were three events that changed my He last year that b e
not funy
recovered f i ~ m , but the lord has blessed me with his grace to be able to move on in life. I
will mplah the eEekts of each eve* but keep in mind that it's not in order the way ii
happened. One of the incidents that happened was the death of my best fiiend, who was
suppose visiting me at the time of his death i was suppose to pick him up, but I could
not, and his mother got sick, so we decided that the best thing for both parties was to plan
the trip for another weekend That same night, be got shot as he carne oui of his front
door. The issue that depressed me was the fact that I had plans to pick him up that day. I
fist conld not get over the fact that if1 had indeed -picked him up, he would still be living-
That sent me into a kind of shock that seriously took a toll on my mental state.
Z
t b '
F D W - B D ~ ~
The most significant incident that I had to overcome in February of 2003
that played a role in my misconduct was the death of my first born so
B
I had a girlfriend whom I was engaged to that became pregnant for me.
She was due to deiiver around April I, 2003, but complications made my son come
prematurely. Two days before I got on a plane, I received a call saying my son had
passed away. Dzning the pregnancy, my girEiend and I were trying to work out our
relationship, and when my son got taken away fiom me, it destroyed my world. The
fad that I had a son was my nkimate accoqlishmerit in He and when t b t
accomplishment got taken fiom me, I had nothing left to give to my job, or my
relationship and both worlds fen apart. Needless to say, that was the end of our
relationship because i t led to arguments, and blaming, and a lot of stress.
The last thing that took place was a decision %bat my mo%her had made to
not have her surgery for her breast cancer. My mom decided that one surgery had
been enough, and she was not going to go through chemotherapy ever again, and
the doctor told her that her decision gave her about 2 months to live. The family
had gone to this appointment -Lwith my mother ffor support, and this statement fiom
the doctor broke us all down. I will just say that this really stressed me out because
I had no intentions of sitting around and ..watching my mother slowly die- My
misconduct happened after this information was passed to us, and I had cried myself
to the point to depression, and honestly
I needed to drug myself; or c o d
suicide to justifj all of these things that were happerzing to me. I got back to San
Antonio, and my first day back at work, I got notified tkd f would be leaving
a
TDY as soon as two weeks. The level of stress in my life was getting higher by the
day.
These events that happened to me really played a sigmficant role in my
actions- All of tlrirlgs happened in a 30-45 day span, and 1 honestly don't know
anyone that could have endured what I went through without contemplating
suicide. F feel as if1 had no one to turn to because I worked at the MPF with
officers, and highly enlisted officials and they made it seem as though under no .
k m t a a c e can one lose sex-control, and t&'s why I betieve -that I was not
offered help for my depression. I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded to -
honorable based on my work ethic, and my evaluations of my work that I received
from my supervisors. Any EPR that was ever done on me reflects the highest rating
possible and also included remarks from o££iciaIs thai prove that I am a depe&Ee
employee. I am also requesting that my discharge to be upgraded for the benefit of
i
my *e.
E~qloyer's who see this type of discharge, do not care what type of- '
. ,
.
problems I endured. They just see that general discharge, but that does not portray
the image of dxt type of worker I am and what type I would be to these
,
companies. I made a mistake in He, and I have learned and moved on from that. I
have always given 1 10 percent, and when T got depressed and had no m e to give,
and I lost my reason for living. I have rectified my situations with the lord, and I
working for the c h c h tM I attend whlle I am fmishirg my degree plan. I am close
-
to finishing my degree in computer networking, but what good is a bachelor's
degree with a background like h e ? I have applied for many positions, and been -
denied because of my discharge characterization. I feel as though people who live in
"real life' can understand what I went through as a young man, and can appreciate
the hct that the l o ~ d did ~ m t let me take my life for a reason 1 think that I am here.
so that I can become a better person, and help others understand about the
seriousness of depression, and tJx seriousness of reaching out for help. I ask that
whoever is reading this is blessed with an understanding that everyone is not
perfect, and people do make mistakes- T hope that for my h i m e sake that this
situation can be resolved, and I can go back to the working society with pride.
M i wage working k r the church is no way to support my kid, and I am .
?.
'
asking for forgiveness so that my daughter can have the things in life that she needs
to be a better person than I, and so she can have t ? ~
t . k g s in life that she rep&-
.
God Bless,
DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION A N D TRAINING COMMAND
I
I
2 2 MAY 2003
FROM: 37 MSSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
I. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Drug Abuse. The
authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Paragraph 5.54. If my
recommendation is approved, your service could be characterized as Under Honorable
Conditions (General) Discharge. I am recommending your service be characterized as Under
Honorable Condijions (General).
2. My reason for this action is that you did, at or near San Antonio, Texas, between on or about
1 February 2003 and 26 February 2003, wrongfully use marijuana . For this misconduct, you
received an Article 15, dated 25 Apr 03, and your punishment was reduction to the grade of E-3,,
with a new date of rank of 25 Apr 03.
3. Copies of the docbents to be forward to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The Commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force, if you are
discharged, and how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be
ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
4. You have the right to counsel. Military Legal Counsel has been obtained for you. I have
made an appointment for you to consult the Area Defense Counsel (ADC) at Building 1000, on
2 3 m
expense. If employed, civilian counsel must be readily available.
hours. You may consult civilian counsel at your own
at 0 4 a o
20 0 3
5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by (3 work days)^&^^ 03
, unless
you request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation
authority.
-
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statement in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
I
I
7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to Wilford Hall
Medical Center, Family Medicine Clinic, on z?
medical, immunization, and dental records for the exahination.
0 3 at 13 3 4
hours with your
8. You have been scheduled for a Transition Assistance Program (TAP) briefing. You must
at
report to the Family Support Center, Bld
O F -
hours for an appointment
9. Any personal information you furmsh in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at the Commander's Support Staff.
10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Commander
Attachments:
1. AF Form 3070, dated 25 Apr 03 wlatchs
2. AF Form 11 37, disposition date 29 Apr 04
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00289
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00289 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge. The misconduct included improper use of government travel card, repeated occasions of being late for work (over five times), unprofessional behavior, personal issues during duty hours, failure to go (four separate occasions), disrespect towards NCO and derelict in the performance of...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00141A
The supervisors at hand did not offer positive mentoring, but told me the Air Force comes first, and that is the Air Force. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct, Minor Disciplinary Infractions. For violating 24-hours quarters authorization, you received a LOR on 31 Mar 99, which was placed in your existing UIF on 13 Apr 99 (Atch 4, Tab 1).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00081
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 7 GRADE 1 AB I I . CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate undcr the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00179
Applicant statement to the Air Force Discharge Review Board. The one thing that makes life easier to deal with is my relationship with God. I f you are discharged, you w i l 4.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00114
SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 24 Jan 01 for 6 yrs. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Frn 293) dtd 8 Mar 05 (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF ATCH 1. Applicant's Issues To Whom It May Concern: I would like to submit this letter as a reason for why my Discharge should be changed 6om a General under Honorable Conditions lo an Honorable discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00326
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 SECRETARY O F THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE W V I L W BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS Am, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER VU-2005-00326 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00202
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge rcgulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. My name is; -------------- ;and I am applying for an upgrade of my General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge from the U.S. Air Force. I believe 1 was a casualty of the Air Forces reduction that took...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00169
See attached cy of Examiner's Brief dtd 20 Jul 05. b. For your misconduct you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 8 Mar 04 (Attachment 3). For your misconduct you received an LOC, dated 21 Apr 04 (Attachment 4).
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00296
The DRB concluded that the applicant was personally responsible for arriving on time for work and appointments. Applicant stated that after she submitted a Congressional about her case her chain of command retaliated by discharging her with a General under honorable conditions discharge. For your actions, you receive a Record of Individual Counseling (ROIC) dated 14 Oct 04; and b.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2004-00421
Applicant's Issues. Some of the airmen names on the applications were the ones being discharged at the time. For this offense you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 3 Dec 98. d. On or about 9 Nov 98, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty.