I NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
TYPE GEN
I
MEMBER SITTlNG
ISSUES A94.05
INDEX NUMBER
A67.50
I GRADE
/ AMN
I AFSNISSAN
RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OFCOUNSEL
I .
- .
VOTE OF TIIE BOARD
- - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - . -
I DENY
1
.OTHER
1 UOTHC
I
GEN
1
/
-
HON
X --
-
imqrp S U B M I T T E ~ T O ~ sokm
1 ( ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 1 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSFI.'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL E X H I B I T S ~ ~ B ~ ~ T E D
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
AT TIME^
TAPE RECORDNG OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
--
I
-.
-
HEARING DATE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00160
I
APPLICANTS ISSLT AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE A T I ACHED AfR FORCE DISCIIARGE REVIEW BONU) DECISIONAL RtSI IONALE
I
'
1 Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH M B , TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AYE, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2004-00160
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and, to change the reenlistment code.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of
reenlistment code are denied.
ISSUE: Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and he wishes to reenter the
Air Force. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, three Letters of Reprimand, one Letter
of Counseling, and one Memorandum for Record for misconduct. The DRB opined that through these
administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board
concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The
characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
111 view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN) (HGH A1C)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr Kirtland AFB, NM on 24 Jan 02
UP AFI 36-3208, para 5.50 (Pattern of Misconduct). Appeals for Honorable
Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 24 Oct 81. Enlmt Age: 18 9/12. Disch Age: 20 4/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-65, E-62, G-42, M-27. PAFSC: 3P031 - Security Forces Apprentice.
DAS: 8 May 01.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 31 Jul 00 - 17 Oct 00 (2 months 17 days)(Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 18 Oct 00 for 6 yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 3 Mo 7 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 20 Dec 01 (~rticle 15, 20 Dec 01)
A1C - 1 Dec 00
c. Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: (1) 20 Dec 01, Kirtland AFB, NM - Article 86. You did, on
or about 10 Dec 01, without authority, fail to go at the
time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
Article 92. You, who knew of your duties, at or near
Albuquerque, New Mexico, on or about 26 Nov 01, were
derelict in the performance of those duties in that you
willfully failed to refrain from consuming alcoholic
beverages while underage, as it was your duty to do.
Reduction to Amn, 30 days restriction, and 10 days extra
duty. (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: LOR, 23 NOV 01 - Failure to go.
LOR, 13 SEP 01 - Reporting to duty unshaven.
LOR, 13 AUG 01 - Failure to go.
MFR, 23 JUL 01 - Failure to demonstrate proper customs and
LOC, 18 JUL 01 - Reporting to duty unshaven.
courtesies while on duty.
f. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: None.
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs (5) Mos (25) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs (3) Mos ( 7 ) Das
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Frn 293) dtd 24 Apr 04.
(Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority
for Discharge)
Issue 1: Please respond in writing the outcome of my claim, because I'm
seeking reinstatement in the Air Force. I have mature (sic) sophistically (sic)
in experience, in age, in knowledge, in acceptance and responsibility, in
perception, in readiness and adaptability. I enter (sic) in the Air Force
straight from school as a non-experience (sic) person. I suffered from culture
shock because I was never away from my environment. Please give me a chance.
Please read military records. Thank you in advance.
ATCH
1. Copy of Military Personnel Record.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
377TH SECURITY FORCES SQUADRON (AFMC)
KIRTLAND AIR FORCE BASE NEW MEXICO
'
MEMORANDUM FOR 0 Cj ~nn 0 2
FROM: 377 SFSICC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum
1. I am recommending your discharge fiom the United States Air Force for misconduct,
specifically, a pattern of misconduct. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-
3208, paragraph 5.50. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as
general.
2. My reasons for this action are:
a. On or about 2 Jan 02, you received punishment under Article 15 of the UCMJ. (See
attached Article 15 for complete details). (Atch 1)
b. On or about 23 Nov Ql, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR). (See attached LOR
for complete details). (Atch 1)
c. On or about 9 Sep 01, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR). (See attached LOR for
complete details). (Atch 1)
d. On or about 13 Aug 01, you received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR). (See attached LOR
for complete details). (Atch 1)
e. On or about 18 Jul 01, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC). (See attached LOC
for complete details). (Atch 1)
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible
for reenlistment in the Air Force. Special pay, bonuses, or education assistance hnds may be
subject to recoupment.
4. You have the right to
You may contact Captain
expense.
legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
You may consult civilian counsel at your own
5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me within 3 r~orkdays fiom today unless you request
and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will forward all documents you provide to the
separation authority.
6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.
7. You will complete a medical examination at the 377th Medical Group (Physical Exams) on
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your unit orderly room.
Commander
Attachments:
1. Supporting Documentation
2. Other Derogatory Data
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00049
(EF-V2) CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2003-00049 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable to change the reason and authority for the discharge. Applicant further requests that the reason for his discharge be changed to “expiration of term of service.” The records indicated the applicant received four Letters of Reprimand, three Letters of Counseling, had an Unfavorable Information File, and was found guilty at Special...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0015
INITIATION OF ACTION: C AFRL, Det 8/CC, recommends that A1C misconduct, specifically a pattern of misconduct, he further recommended that Respondent receive a general (under honorable conditions) discharge without an opportunity for probation and rehabilitation (P&R). RESPONDENT: Respondent, 21, has been in the Air Force for approximately two years and three months. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, specifically, a pattern of misconduct.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00168
y* AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN aici TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW “ "| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR GRGANIZATION OF COUNSEL "COUNSEL, VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING ft EXHIBITS SUBMIT TRO. After a thorough and complete consideration of the information submitted by applicant and contained 1n the records, the Board concluded there was sufficient mitigation to substantiate...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00120
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2003-00120 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Applicant was discharged for conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline. Appeals for Honorable Discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00143
3KD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, ~ 6 2 0 7 6 2 - 7 0 0 2 Previous edition will be used I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER F~-2004-00143 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. At the time of the discharge member waived his right to consult with counsel and to submit statements in his own behalf. (Atch B) c. On 20 May 03, you received punishment under Article 15 for striking another airman in the face with your fist and underage dmking.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00364
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIIIULE INITIAL,) GRADE A FSNISSA N AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I TYPE GEN I I ] NAME OF COlINSEI AND OR OR(;ANIZA'I ION PERSONAL APPEARANCE I C o W ~ ~ ~ ~ I I MEMBER SITTING 1 ISSUES A92.21 INDEX NIIMOER A67.50 IIE4RINC DATE CASE NUMBEH I AMN 1 X I I I I RECORDREVIEW ADDRESS AND OR OR(;I\NILA~ION OF COIJNSEL I YQT6 OF THE BOARD I 1 I X .- X t EXHIHrTS SUBMlTTED TO 'THE...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00160
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for being disrespectful toward a TSgt on two separate occasions and for failure to go. The Commander could have used adjustment disorder as a narrative reason for discharge, but this would have resulted in the applicant having “Personality Disorder” on his DD Form 214 (not “medical” as the applicant desired). Supporting Documents LOC, 6 Feb 03 LOC, 6 Feb 03 Mental Health Evaluation Recommendations, 4 Jun 03 AF Form 3070, 17 Jul 03...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00011
'The Vacation action for failure to go resulted in a forfeiture of pay. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. On 23 Mar 05, you showed up for a firing appointment unshaven, As a result, you received a LRtter of Reprimand (LOR) on 24 Mar 04 (Tab 1-2).
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00158
L-.-- EXIllBlTS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD I I 1 - -- --I ORDER APPOM7MCi 'I'HE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE "." Room 5500 Washington, DC 20593 DD FORM 293, AUG 2003 Page 2 of 4 Pages I3EPARTMENT OF THE AJR FORCE 377th Security Police Squadron (AFMC) 2 Jan 96 FROM: 377 SPSICC SUBJECT: Notification Letter -- Board Hearing I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for a pattern of misconduct. As a result, you received a Letter of Counseling, dated 3 1 Jan 95. b.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00226
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0226 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The applicant did not receive a “bad discharge”. For this act of misconduct you received an Article 15, dated 22 Jun 94.