AIR FORCE Dl ISCHARGE REVlE
.
I
NAME OF COUNSEI. AYD OH ORGANIZATION
ADDRESS A N D O R C
/ Case heard at Washington, D.C.
I
Advise applicant ofthe decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, aad the right to
suhmlt an application to the AFBCMR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-47
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01304
Theratingsfortheunfittinglowbackandright knee conditions are addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140007238 (PD201301304) I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00812
The PEB combined the bilateral knee condition as a single unfitting condition, coded analogouslyto5003andratedat10%. TheBoard mustapplyseparate codes andratingsinits recommendations if compensable ratings for each condition are achieved IAW applicable VASRDsections. TheBoardnotedtheclinicexaminationof2007,5 years after separation, recorded full ROM bilaterally, a normal gait and no evidence of instability.
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00300
1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I AMN ...-..-..-..-.. RECORD REVIEW X ADUROSS AND OH ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL VOTE OR @& BOARD GEN I UO. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02791
The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separationand, to review those fitness determinations within its scope consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. tenderness to palpation; Decreased movement of toes of right foot; Repetitive motion increased ROM; No temperature change; No skin or vascular changes; Normal reflexes...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01419
Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain (Right Shoulder) w/Posterior Instability 5099-500310%Right Shoulder Posterior Instability s/p Reconstructive Surgery 520220%20040217Chronic LBP5299-523710%LBP5237Not Service Connected (NSC)20040217Other x 0Other x0 Combined: 20%Rating: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040518 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00379
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. SERVICE UNDER...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00113
The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. In 2008, the VA further increased this rating to 40% effective on 31 March 2004 based on evidence from continuing treatment records and a later VA C&P examination in May 2008. I concur with that finding, accept their recommendation and direct that your records be corrected as set forth in the attached copy of a Memorandum for the Chief of Staff, United States Air Force.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00429
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING DA'IE CASE NUMBER Case heard at Washington, D.C Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR I I TO: ,. - -- DATE: 014412004' : , - '. ., S T C R L ~ ~ R I trv IVF ~ I R r l R FORCI D I S C I l A Y G F R...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00362
On 3 Nuv 9 2 , you were i n v i o l a t i o n of AFR 35-10. r e c e i v e d a L e t t e r of C o u n s e l i n g on 6 Nov 92 (Tab 1 - 1 0 ) . You must consult legal counsel before making a daei~ion to waive any of your rights. 23 Aug 9 1 , LOR/UIF; 2 J u l 92, MFR: 22 Sep 9 2 , LOC; 6 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 13 Gct 9 2 , LOR; 16 Oct 9 2 , LOC; 28 Oct 92, LOR/UIF/Control Roster; 2 Nov 9 2 , LOR; 4 Nov 92, MFR; 6 Nov 9 2 , LOC; 12 Nov 92, LOR 2 .
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01251
Separation Date: 20050906 The back condition, characterized as “chronic lower back pain (LBP) with right lower extremity radiculopathy,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.