NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
1 GRADE
I AFSNISSAN
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
I
1 NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
I
TYPE UOTH IX
YES
No
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
RECORDREVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING
. . . . . - - . . . .
HON
1
I
.
VOTE OF THE BOAKI)
...
GEN
UOTHC
.
I OTHER
I DENY
X
X
X
X
X
ISSUES A94.53
A95.00
INDEX NUMBER
A67.30
1
2
3
4
EXJ$BITS SUBMITTEP TO THE BOA1RD
ORDER APPOlNTMG THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
20 Oct 2004
AF'PLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DEClSlOEjAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON TkE ATTACED AIR FORCE. DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
I
I
I
I FD-2003-00497
I
I
Case heard at Andrews AFB, MD, via video teleconference from Travis AFB, CA.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.
TO:
SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742
DATE: 10/20/2004
FROM:
SECRETARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING. 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD-2003-00497
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment
code.
The applicant appeared before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) at Andrews AFB, MD, via video
teleconference from Travis AFB, CA.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge and change of reenlistment code are denied.
The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS
(Former SRA) (HGH TSGT)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a UOTHC Disch fr USAF 5 Jun 00 UP AFI 36-
3208, para 5.52.3 (Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense). Appeals for
Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 27 Oct 64. Enlmt Age: 19 5/12. Disch Age: 35 7/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-67, E-62, G-58, M-68. PAFSC: 4R051 - Radiologic Journeyman.
DAS: 30 Jun 94.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 14 Apr 84 - 1 Jan 85 (8 Months 19 Days) (Inactive).
(2) Enld as A1C 2 Jan 85 for 4 yrs. Ext: 30 Dec 87 for 13
months. Reenld as SRA 12 Dec 88 for 4 yrs. Ext: 22 Jul 92 for 28 months.
Reenld as SSgt 1 Oct 92 for 4 yrs. Ext: 4 Jan 95 for 32 months. Svd: 13 Yrs 3
Mos 19 Das, all AMS. SRA - (EPR Indicates): 2 Jan 87 - 1 Jan 88. Sgt - (EPR
Indicates): 2 Jan 88 - 1 Jan 89. SSgt - 1 May 91. APRs: 9,9,9,9,9. EPRs:
5,5,5,4,5,5,5,5,5.
3 . SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenld as SSgt 21 Apr 98 for 4 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 1 Mo 16 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: SRA - 27 Jul 99 (GCMO No 46, 20 Sep 99)
TSGT - 1 Jan 99
c , Time Lost: None.
d. Art 15's: None.
e. Additional: Unknown.
f. CM: General Court Martial Order No 46, 20 September 1999.
CHARGE 1: Article 121. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty
Specification 1: Did, at or near Phoenix AZ, on or about 12 Feb
96, steal $12,209.36, the property of State Farm Fire and Casualty
Company.
Specification 2: Did, at or near Phoenix AZ, between on or about
30 Jun 94 to on or about 24 Feb 99, steal $6,020.58, military
property of the United States.
Specification 3: Did, at or near Phoenix AZ, between on or about
1 Feb 96 and on or about 15 Jun 98, steal two office chairs and
one box containing twelve picture frames, military property, of a
value of more than $100.00, the property of the United States.
Specification 4: Did, at or near Phoenix AZ, on or about 30 Jun
96, steal four lawn chairs, of a total value of more than $100.00,
the property of Northern Greens Apartment.
CHARGE 11: Article 134. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification: Did, at or near Phoenix AZ, between on or about 15
Jun 94 to on or about
intercourse with SSgt
wife. Plea: Guilty, except for the words, "15 June 1994 to on or
about 24 November 1998." substituting therefore the words "15
August 1995 to 24 November 1997.'' Sentence adjudged by officer
members on 13 Jul 99. Three months hard labor without
confinement, forfeiture of $250 pay per month for 24 months, and
reduction to senior airman.
lly have sexual
a married woman, not his
g. Record of SV: 05 Sep 97 - 12 Jun 98 Luke AFB 5 (CRO)
13 Jun 98 - 30 Apr 99 Luke AFB 5 (CRO)
(Discharged from Luke AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFCM W/1 DEV, AFLSA W/2 DEV, AFTR, NDSM, SAEMR, NCOPMER
W/1 DEV, AFOUA W/3 DEV, AFGCM W/4 DEV.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (16) Yrs (1) Mos (23) Das
TAMS: (15) Yrs (5) Mos (4) Das
4 . B A S I S ADVANCED FOR REXIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 14 Oct 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I have been working with DAV since my discharge on a request for
an upgrade. Today, I contacted the office when a different represenative (sic)
stated that I could not request an upgrade through them, but needed to go
through "the branch of service" for a request. I have been waiting for three
years and now I am asking for the board to review my military records and grant
my request for an upgrade. Thank you.
ATCH
1. VA Letter, 15 Dec 00.
5 Jan 2004/cr
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
56th Medical Support Squadron (AETC)
Luke Air Force Base Arizona
0 l30?
FROM: CC
SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum - Board Hearing
1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Commission
of Serious Offenses. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208,
Section H, paragraph 5.52.3. This action could result in your separation with an under
other than honorable (UOTHC) service characterization. I am recommending your
service be characterized as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC).
2. My reasons for this action are;
a. On or about 30 Jun 94 to on or about 24 Feb 99, you stole military property
valued at $6,020.58. A Report of Result of Trial, dated 13 JuI 99 evidences this.
b. On or about 15 Aug 95 to on or about 24 Nov 97, you wrongfuIly had sexual
married woman, not your wife. A Report of
intercourse with ssgt-a
Result of Trial, dated 13 Jul99 evidences this.
c. On or about 1 Feb 96 and or about 15 Jun 98, you stole two office chairs and
one box containing twelve picture frames, military property, valued at more than $100.00.
A Report of Result of Trial, dated 13 Jul99 evidences this.
d. On or about 12 Feb 96, you stole $12,209.63 the property of State Farm
. Casualty Company. A Report of Result of rial, dated 13 Jul 99 evidences this.
e. On or about 30 Jun 96, you stole four lawn chairs, of a total value of more than '
$1 00.00, the property of Northern Greens Apartments. A Report of Result of Trial, dated
13 Jul99.
,
3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority to support this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will make the final decision in this matter. If you are discharged, you will be
ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education
assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.
4. You have the right to:
a. Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
d. Submit statements in.your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the board
hearing.
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making a decision
to waive any of your rights.
5. You must retrieve your medical records from the 56th Medical Group Hospital
Outpatient records and immediately report to Physical Exams, Building 8 10, with your
medical records and your copy of this AFI 36-3208 discharge package for medical review
and/or examination.
6. I have made an appointment for you to consult the Area Defense Counsel, Bldg 1 150,
Suite 301 5, Extension 6701 on *MJ*
hours. Instead of the
appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the active
military service and is reasonably available as determined by AFI 5 1-20 1. In addition to
military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force does not
pay expenses incident to the employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if
employed, must be readily available.
\ 000
at
7. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within 7 workdays, specifying the
rights you choose to exercise. The statement must be signed after consultation with your
counsel who also will sign it. If you waive your right to a hearing before an
administrative discharge board, you may submit written statements in your own behalf. I
will send the statements to the discharge authority with the case file to be considered with
this recommendation. If you fail to respond, your failure will constitute a waiyer of the
right to a board hearing.
8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of
1974. A copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use through your defense counsel.
9. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.
Attachments:
1. Report of Result of Trial, dated 13 Jul99
2. Action of the Convening Authority, dated 20 Sep 99
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00338
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0431
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0431 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Reenld as SSgt 5 Jan 83 for 4 yrs.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00253
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant provides a sufficient basis in clemency for a change of discharge. Issue. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court Martial was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis as an act of clemency for change of discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00075
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WMG, 3RD n O O R ANDREW'S AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00075 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. As evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 6 Mar 03: You, did, at or near Panama City, Florida, on divers occasions, between on or...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0389
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0389 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. 4, 29 Sep 99) c. Time Lost: 12 Aug 99 - 1 Oct 99 (1 Month 20 Days) d. Art 15’s: (1) 30 Dec 98, Osan AB, Korea - Article 92. [am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force based upon Commission of Serious Offenses.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00017
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE I CASENUMBER FD-0 1 -000 17 GENERAL: The applicant appealed for upgrade of his discharge frombailreofiduct to h6-k applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at Andrews AFB, MD, on April 5,2001. Issue 2 : At the time of my court martial, the Base Commander was more likely to approve a "bad conduct" discharge or worse then receive approve lesser punishment. Issue 3: Out of the eight Air...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00011
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0011 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Applicant's Rebuttal to Discharge w/20 Atchs. Attachments: Letter of Reprimand dated 30 Oct 96 .
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0479
C003 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 2 3 4 TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°? CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00161
During this time, the applicant's commander inappropriately used hearsay and opinion in a letter he wrote to the Medical Evaluation Board. S E R V I C E UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 26 Sep 94 for 6 yrs. Medical Board Review.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00057
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00057 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, two Letters of Reprimand, a Letter of Admonishment and a Record of Individual Counseling for misconduct. DISCUSSXON: As the separation authority, you must make four determinations: (1) whether a basis for discharge exists; (2) whether an involuntary discharge is appropriate in...