Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0479
Original file (FD2002-0479.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

AME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

 

MEMBERS SITTING

it a

    

asi

  
 

  

aE

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

GRADE AFSN/SSAN

AMN ie

X RECORD REVIEW

 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER

A94.53, A92.37, A93.17 A66.00

HEARING DATE

24 JUN 03

CASE NUMBER

FD2002-0479

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

submit an application to the AFBCMR.

SAF/MIBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

 

  

Boe EXHIBITS SUBMITIED TO, THE BOART. C003
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

 

 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

 

BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

1
2
3

4

 

 

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to

 

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°? FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

(EF-V2)

Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | py)7002-0479

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any.

Issues. Applicant was discharged for misconduct, drug abuse. A positive urinalysis in May 1999 disclosed
the presence of marijuana, for which member pled guilty and was found guilty by Special Court Martial but
did not receive a punitive discharge. Member testified at court and admitted in a signed sworn statement
that he did use marijuana while attending his sister’s birthday party with family and friends. At the time of
the offense, member was a noncommissioned officer with over 18 years service. Member elected to waive
his right to have his case heard by an administrative discharge board, as well as consideration for lengthy
service probation. Additionally, member failed to submit statements in his own behalf at the time of
discharge. The record review also disclosed member had an Article 15 for assaulting his wife, assaulting a
civilian, using provoking speech to a police officer, and endangering his children during the enlistment
under review. Member’s appeal of the resulting reduction in grade was denied. Member also had a referral
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rated an overall “3” out of “5” based on that incident, and was relieved
of duty for cause from the recruiting career field. Additionally, during a previous enlistment member had
used and possessed marijuana and hashish at an overseas location in 1982 while on active duty in the
service, which resulted in a positive urinalysis and decertification from the Security Police career field. The
Board noted that the Air Force’s drug policy was well publicized and members were continually made
aware that illegal drug use was not tolerated. Drug abuse by a noncommissioned officer is a particularly
serious failure to meet Air Force standards that does not warrant an honorable characterization of service.
The Board could find no inequity or impropriety on which to base an upgrade to the discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002~-0479
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

naan: (Former AMN) (HGH TSGT)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 22 Nov 99 UP AFI 36-
3208, para 5.54 (Misconduct - Drug Abuse). Appeals for Honorable Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 4 Aug 63. Enlmt Age: 17 4/12. Disch Age: 36 3/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-75, E-78, G-82, M-40. PAFSC: 25051 - Supply Management
Journeyman. DAS: 6 Jan 98.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 29 Dec 80 - 25 Jun 81 (5 months 28 days) (Inactive).

(2) Enlisted as AB 26 Jun 81 for 6 yrs. Extended 21 Aug 86
for 22 months. Reenlisted as SSgt 30 Sep 88 for 4 yrs. Reenlisted as SSgt 03
Jul 91 for 4 yrs. Extended as 30 Aug 94 for 4 months. Svd: 14 yrs 1 month 0
days, all AMS. A1C - 11 Aug 81. SRA - 1 Jun 84. SSgt-(APR Indicates): 22 May
85-21 May 86. TSgt - 1 Dec 92. APRs: 8,8,9,9,8,9,9,9,7,9. EPRs: 4,4,4,5,5,5.

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Reenlisted as TSgt 27 Jul 95 for 6 yrs. Svd: 4 Yrs 3 Mo 26 Das, of
which AMS is 4 yrs 1 months 12 days (2 months 14 days lost time).

b. Grade Status: Amn - 3 Aug 99 (SPCMO#1, 4 Oct 99)
SSgt - 24 Feb 97 (Article 15, 24 Feb 97)

c. Time Lost: 3 Aug 99 thru 15 Oct 99 (2 months 14 days)

qd. Art 15’s: (1) 24 Feb 97, Fort Myers, FL - Article 128. You, did, on
or about 26 Nov 96, unlawfully strike ----- in the right
cheek with your fist. You, did, on or about 26 Nov 96,
unlawfully strike ------ with your fist. Article 116.
You, did, on or about 26 Nov 96, cause a breech of peace
by wrongfully engaging in a fist fight with ------ , on
Colonial Blivd, a public street, and using the following
provoking language toward a police officer, to wit:
"Puck that," or words to that effect. Article 134.
You, did, on or about 26 Nov 96, through culpable
negligence, expose your children, ------ and ------ , to
personal injury, by leaving them in a driverless car,
when you forcefully pulled the driver from the vehicle.
Reduction to SSgt. (Appeal/Denied) (No mitigation)

e. Additional: None.

£. CM: Special Court Martial Order No.1 - 4 Oct 99.
FD2002-0479

CHARGE: Article 112a. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.

Specification: Did, at or near MacDill AFB, FL, between on or
about 13 Apr 99 to on or about 13 May 99, wrongfully use
Marijuana. Sentence adjudged by officer and enlisted members on

3 Aug 99: Reduction to the grade of airman (E-2), and confinement
for 3 months.

g. Record of SV: 19 May 95 - 18 May 96 Fort Myers 4 (Annual)
19 May 96 - 14 Oct 96 Fort Myers 5 (CRO)
15 Oct 96 - 13 Jun 97 Punta Gorda 3. (CRO) REF
14 Jun 97 - 16 Jun 98 Mac Dill AFB 5 (Annual)
17 Jun 98 - 23 Apr 99 Mac Dill AFB 5 = (CRO)

(Discharged from Mac Dill AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFAM, AFCM, AFLSAR W/3 DEVS, AFTR, AFOSSTR, AFOSLTR W/1
DEV, NDSM, SAEMR, NCOPMER W/1 DEV, AFOUA W/3 DEVS, AFGCM W/4 DEVS.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (18) Yrs (8) Mos (10) Das
J TAMS: (18) Yrs (2) Mos (13) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 1 Nov Q2.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.

ATCH
None.

13MAR03/ia
4 P PALO CTS

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

6TH AIR REFUELING WING (AMC)
MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

 

OCT 1 2 1999

FROM: 6 SUPS/CC

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum - Board Hearing

1. Iam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for drug abuse. The
authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54. Copies of the
documents to be forwarded to the separation authority to support this recommendation are
attached.

2. My reasons for this action are as follows: Between on or about 13 April 1999 to on or about
13 May 1999, you wrongfully used marijuana. This incident resulted in your conviction at a
Special Court-Martial the result of which was reported on AF Form 1359, Report of Result of
Trial, dated 3 Aug 99 and set forth in the Action dated 4 Oct 99.

3. This action could result in your separation with an under honorable conditions (general)
discharge. I am recommending that you receive an under honorable conditions (general)
discharge. The commander exercising Special Court-Martial (SPCM) jurisdiction or a higher
authority will make the final decision in this matter. If you are discharged, you will be ineligible
for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be denied enlistment in any component of the

armed forces.

4. You have the right to:

a. Consult legal counsel.

b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.

c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.

d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu of, the board hearing.
e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making a decision to

waive any of your rights.

5. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the 6th Medical
Group Hospital - Physical Exams, at 0930 hours on 13 Oct 99 for Part.I and at 1340 Kours on 13
Oct 99 for Part IL.

6. Military counsel Capt Seite as been obtained to assist you. An appointment has
been scheduled for you at the MacDill AFB Area Defense Counsel’s office on 14 Oct 99 at 1400

hours. Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the
active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to AFI 51-201. In

AMC - GLOBAL REACH FOR AMERICA
PY Ce rs

addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel. The Air Force does
not pay expenses incident to the employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if employed,
must be readily available.

7. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within 7 workdays, specifying the rights you
choose to exercise. The statement must be signed in the presence of your counsel who also will
sign it. If you waive your right to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, you may
submit written statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements to the discharge
authority with the case file to be considered with this recommendation. If you fail to respond,
your failure will constitute a waiver of the right to the board hearing.

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the unit orderly room.

9. If you request a board and you fail to appear without good cause, your failure to appear
constitutes a waiver of your right to be present at the hearing.

10. The discharge board or the discharge authority will make the finding and recommendations
required under 10 U.S.C. 2005 (g).

_ 11. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

 

Commander, 6 Supply Squadron

Attachments:

Respondent’s Acknowledgment

Special Court-Martial Action, dated 4 Oct 99

AF Form 1359, Report of Result of Trial

Memorandum for Record, dated 2 Jun 99

AF Form 1168, Statement of suspect/witness/complainant, dated 7 Jun 98
Care Inquiry from Record of Trial, dated 3 Aug 99

AF Form 3070, Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings, dated 7 May 97

NAAPWNS

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0431

    Original file (FD2002-0431.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0431 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Reenld as SSgt 5 Jan 83 for 4 yrs.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00497

    Original file (FD2003-00497.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00497 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. This action could result in your separation with an under other than honorable (UOTHC) service characterization. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00226

    Original file (FD2005-00226.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    'I('E MEhlBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE A FSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GEN I I PERSONAL APPEARANCE - -- .------A ~ s E ~ I N A M E b F COliNSFl AND OR ORGAN17A I ION - X ADDRESS AND OR OHAIR FORCE DISCIIARGK REVIEW BOARD IIECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE IVL1hlHF.R F])-2(,05-OUZ26 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. b. Grade Status: A m - 08 Nov 01 (Article 15, 8 Nov 01) SrA - 05 Dec 00 A1C - 05 Apr 99 A m - 05 Jun 98 AB - 05...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0389

    Original file (FD2002-0389.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0389 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. 4, 29 Sep 99) c. Time Lost: 12 Aug 99 - 1 Oct 99 (1 Month 20 Days) d. Art 15’s: (1) 30 Dec 98, Osan AB, Korea - Article 92. [am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force based upon Commission of Serious Offenses.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00065

    Original file (FD2003-00065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD er as NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL’ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON “GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x 4 x xX X }_ XxX ISSUES INDEX NUMBER : EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A93.09 A47.00, A49.00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD [> APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00161

    Original file (FD2004-00161.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During this time, the applicant's commander inappropriately used hearsay and opinion in a letter he wrote to the Medical Evaluation Board. S E R V I C E UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 26 Sep 94 for 6 yrs. Medical Board Review.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00154

    Original file (FD2004-00154.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REMEW ROARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDIUWS ATB, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE m V I E W BOA KI) DECISIONAL RAIIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2004-00154 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of thc discharge regulation and was within the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00338

    Original file (FD2003-00338.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00075

    Original file (FD2005-00075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WMG, 3RD n O O R ANDREW'S AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00075 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. As evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 6 Mar 03: You, did, at or near Panama City, Florida, on divers occasions, between on or...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0475

    Original file (FD2002-0475.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    J CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court Martial was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis as an act of clemency for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MI3 (Former AB) (HGK SRA) 1. Svd: 3 Yrs 0 Mo 20 Das, of which AMS is 2 Yrs 11 Mos 1 Das (ex: 1 Month 19 Days lost time) b. Grade...