I AFSNISSAN
I A l C
. - . - . . .
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2
3
4
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDMG OF PERSONAL APPERANCE
HEARlNG DATE
1 16 Dec 2003
CASE NUMBER
I FD-2003-00253
1
1
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance witWwithout counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
I TO:
/ "
SAFIMRBR ((
I
550 C STREET W ST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
I FROM:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REIlEW BOARD
IS35 COMMAND D R EE WING. 3RD FIBOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00
(EF-V2)
Previous edition will be used
/
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER
FD2003-00253
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
&
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board but declined to
exercise this right.
*
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant provides a sufficient
basis in clemency for a change of discharge.
Issue. The applicant did not receive an administrative discharge. He received a Bad Conduct Discharge, a
punitive discharge, as part of his sentence resulting from a Special Court Martial conviction. Under the
provisions of Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1553, the only basis for change of a Bad Conduct Discharge, is
clemency. The applicant submitted insufficient evidence to warrant clemency and none was evident in the
record.
If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate justification for clemency, the applicant
should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. If he should choose to
exercise this right to a personal appearance hearing, the applicant should be prepared to provide the DRB
with factual evidence of any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to the
community.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the applicant's punitive discharge by
Special Court Martial was appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is
insufficient basis as an act of clemency for change of discharge.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
MISSING DOCUMENTS AND MEDICAL RECORDS
(Former A1C) (HGH TSGT)
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a BCD Disch fr USAF 17 Sep 96 UP Special
Court Martial Order No. 3 (Conviction by Court Martial). Appeals for Honorable
Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 21 Apr 57. Enlmt Age: 17 8/12. Disch Age: 39 4/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-25, E-30, G-55, M-70. PAFSC: 2T151 - Vehicle Operations
Journeyman. DAS: Unknown.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 14 Jan 75 - 12 Feb 75 (29 Days) (~nactive).
(2) Enld as AB 13 Feb 75 for 4 yrs. Ext: 4 Aug 78 for 22
months. Reenld as SSgt 24 Aug 79 for 4 yrs. Reenld as SSgt 9 Feb 83 for 6 yrs.
Svd: 12 Yrs 4 Mos 19 Das. AMN - Unknown. A1C - 13 Feb 76. SrA - 1 Nov 77.
Sgt - 1 Nov 78. SSgt 1 Feb 81. TSgt - Unknown. EPRs: Unknown.
ART 15: (1) 20 Sep 83, March AFB, CA - Article 91. Preliminary
investigation has disclosed that you, on or about
12 Sep 83, were disrespectful in language towards TSgt
your superior NCO, who was then in the
orce Security Police duties, by saying
to him, "quit fucking with me and just leave me alone" or
words to that effect. Article 134. Further
investigation has disclosed that you, on or about 12 Sep
83, were disorderly in station. Article 92. Further
investisation has disclosed that you, havins knowledge of
-
a person
a lawfui order issued by Sgt
then having and in the execution of Alr Force Security
Police duties, to halt, an order which it was your duty
to obey, on or about 12 Sep 83, fail to obey the same.
Forfeiture of $100.00.
-
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenld as TSgt 2 Jul 87 for 6 yrs. Ext: 28 Apr 93 for 20 months. Svd:
9 Yrs 2 Mo 16 Das, of which AMS is 9 Yrs 2 Mos 12 Das (Ex: 4 Das lost
time) .
b. Grade Status: A1C - 22 Dec 93 (SPCMO No. 3, 6 Sep 96)
c. Time Lost: 30 Jan 92 - 2 Feb 92 (4 days)
d. Art 15's: (1) 7 Jun 93, Robins AFB, GA - Article 86. You did, on
divers occasions, between on or about 17 May 93 and on
or about 19 May 93, without authority, fail to go at the
time prescribed, to your appointed place of duty.
Suspended reduction to SSgt, forfeiture of $150.00 pay
per month for two months, and 45 days extra duty.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
(2) 13 Feb 92, Robins AFB, GA - Article 86. You did, on or
about 30 Jan 92, without authority, absent yourself from
your unit, and did remain so absent until 2 Feb 92.
Suspended reduction to SSgt, and 45 days extra duty.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)
e. Additional: Unknown.
f. CM: Special Court Martial Order No. 2, 22 December 1993.
CHARGE: Article 112a. Plea: Guilty. Finding: Guilty.
Specification: Did, at or near Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, on
divers occasions between on or about 1 May 1993 and on or about 18
Aug 93, wrongfully use cocaine. Sentence adjudged on 8 Oct 93:
Reduction to the grade of AlC, forfeiture of $721.00 pay per month
for 1 month, 6 months confinement, and a bad conduct discharge.
g. Record of SV: Unknown.
(Discharged from Robins AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOLTR W/~DEV, NDSM, AFLSA W/4DEV, NCOPMER
W/lDEV, SAEMR, AFOUA W/3DEV, AFGCM W/6DEV
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (21) Yrs (8) Mos (0) Das
TAMS: (21) Yrs (7) Mos (1) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 19 May 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: Personal problems impaired my ability to serve. (addressed in my
statement attached)
Issue 2: My average conduct and efficiency ratings/behavior and proficiency
marks were very good.
Issue 3: I faced racial discrimination and that impaired by ability to
serve.
Issue 4: My use of drugs impaired my ability to serve.
Issue 5: My use of alcohol impaired my ability to serve.
Issue 6: The punishment I got at disharge was too harsh--it was much worse
thanhost people got for the same offense.
Issue 7: Certain other problems impaired my ability to serve.
ATCH
1. Applicant's Statement.
11 Aug 03/cr
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0431
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0431 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Reenld as SSgt 5 Jan 83 for 4 yrs.
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00497
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00497 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reenlistment code. This action could result in your separation with an under other than honorable (UOTHC) service characterization. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00338
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00374
Svd: 3 yrs ART 15: (1) 12 Nov 82, Randolph AFB, TX - Article 134. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted AFRes as SSgt 1 Nov 97 for 4 yrs. this separation action is set forth in the attached Statement of Reasons (Atch 2) along with supporting documents.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD99-00088
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD1999-0088 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Svd: 3 Yrs 9 Mo 23 Das, of which AMS is 3 yrs 9 months 22 days (excludes 1 day lost time). In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00271
Unfortunately neither member’s medical records or the discharge processing files were available to the Board for review due to being missing from the record. Because member’s discharge file was unavailable to the Board for review, the Board was unable to ascertain if there was other misconduct on member’s part, or additional bases for the discharge. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: The discharge is improper because of an unknown medical condition that affected my performance and...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00176
If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenld as SRA 1 Jul 96 for 4 yrs. (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 21 Apr 97, Falcon AFB, CO - Article 86.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00334
- SECRET.\R\ OF THE AIR FORCE P E R S O h E L C O L C l L AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535COMMAhn DR. EE H'lNC.3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, ~ ~ ' 2 0 1 6 2 - 1 0 0 2 ~ ~ AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOAR11 DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00334 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The records indicated the applicant received an Under Other Than Honorable discharge for misconduct, commission...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0386
{| CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0386 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, a change in the Reason and Authority for the discharge, and to the RE Code. Under Air Force regulations if the separation authority does not | accept a conditional waiver of the discharge board, he can either return the case to the installation to be heard by a discharge board or can request and unconditional waiver of the board. In this...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00028
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00028 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for an upgrade of his discharge to Honorable. However, if the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate his issue, the applicant should consider exercising her right to make a personal appearance before the Board. I would appreciate your consideration in upgrading my discharge so I can further my education, a benefit that I have paid for in advance.