Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00556
Original file (FD2003-00556.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
.  . 

CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 m .
..... dl. ....... r . A . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  

A. 

f

l

. -- 
- n .

.

 

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

Previous edition will be used 



Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052780C070420

    Original file (2001052780C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was first considered for promotion to LTC by the FY 95 LTC JAGC Promotion Selection Board. The Board notes that the applicant had a group of OERs between October 1985 and January 1988 where he was rated as above center of mass. Without evidence to show otherwise, the Board concludes that the officers who were recommended for promotion to LTC, JAGC were, in the promotion boards’ considered opinion, the best qualified.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00806

    Original file (FD-2013-00806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEW BOARDBEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANRECORDREVIEWADDRtSS ANDORORC4N12.ATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY X+* X+*X+* X+* ISSUESA66.00INDEXNUWERA66.00lORDERAPPOINTINGTHE BOARD 2 APPLICATION FORREVIEW OFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASE TOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITS SUBMITTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCEX+*HEARING DATE CASENUMBER TAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARING21Nov...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05888-01

    Original file (05888-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Service for Naval Reserve Retirement, you have only been credited with six years, six months and two days of qualifying service for reserve retired pay at age 60. effective 1 May 1993, this is an honorary status...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061088C070421

    Original file (2001061088C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. He was considered and not selected for promotion to colonel by the 1997, 1998 and 1999 Reserve Components Selection Boards (RCSB’s). The promotion boards do not divulge the proceedings or reasons for non-selection, and this Board cannot determine why he was not selected for promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059781C070421

    Original file (2001059781C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant is a Medical Service Corps lieutenant colonel who was non-selected for promotion to colonel so he was not considered by the same boards that considered the individuals in the U. S. District Court case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004020C070208

    Original file (20040004020C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, the release date of the results for the promotion selection board, which considered but did not select the officer, must be within 6 years from the date that the affected officer submitted his request for promotion reconsideration to the US Total Army Personnel Command (currently designated USAHRC). By letter dated 27 October 2003, the applicant requested a waiver to the time limit for promotion reconsideration as he was never officially notified that he was eligible for such...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010394C070208

    Original file (20040010394C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He learned of the actions directed by the Court, and specifically the Court determination that the instructions used were unconstitutional, in November 2004 when a friend electronically mailed a Washington Post article that discussed the issues involved. In accordance with paragraph 5 of this message, applications for special selection boards received within one year of the date of the message "may be based on original board results that were released within 6 years of the application." It...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054769C070420

    Original file (2001054769C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, promotion reconsideration to colonel (COL) by special selection boards (SSB’s) and by an Officer Professional Development Education (PDE) Selection Board for attendance at a senior service school or fellowship, not based on the “equal opportunities” instructions utilized by the 1996 through 1999 Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007663C070208

    Original file (20040007663C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He commends the Army for allowing passed over officers the opportunity to request a promotion re-look. The applicant had been considered but not selected for promotion to Colonel by the Fiscal Years 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995 promotion selection boards. Specifically, the release date of the results for the promotion selection board, which considered but did not select the officer, must be within 6 years from the date that the affected officer submitted his request for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064935C070421

    Original file (2001064935C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : There is no way to compete for COL due to no fault of his own. OER Ending Period Senior Rater Block Rating (* indicates his rating) The Board concluded that it would be unjust to involuntarily separate her again and voided her previous nonselections to MAJ and showed that she was selected for promotion to major by the SSB which considered her for promotion to MAJ under the first year of her eligibility.