Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00349
Original file (FD2003-00349.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

GRADE 

AFSNMAN 

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 

1 Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to 
submit an application to the AFBCMR 

I 

I 

SAF/MRBR 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

. .. - .. . . 

I 
(EF-V2) 

SFCRCTARY OFTHCAlR FORCE PERZONNCLCOUNCII. 
AIR FORCE DISCHANGL ItEVILU BOARD 
lS35COIfMAND DR. EE WIhC.3RD  F W O R  
AXDRFWS ArB,.wD  20762.lOO2 

Previous edition will be used 

I 

I 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0494

    Original file (FD2002-0494.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    f AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AlC AR X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN, UOTHC | OTHER DENY ~~ ISSUES INDEX NUMBER Au A93.17, A92.21, A92.37 A66.00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 03-05-21 FD2002-0454 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00065

    Original file (FD2004-00065.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD I GRADE I AlC I AFSNISSAN 1 x 1 I I MEMBER SITTING I 1 2 3 4 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING DATE 19 May 2004 CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00065 Case heard at Washington, D.C. Applicant received an honorable discharge for making a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00451

    Original file (FD2005-00451.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    M D 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00451 GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change the reenlistment code. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 13 Oct 99 for 6 yrs. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00459

    Original file (FD2006-00459.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, a Letter of Reprimand and a civilian police report for misconduct. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. Commander, 90th Security Forces Squadron Attachments: 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00041

    Original file (FD2005-00041.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TO: SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR EORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD ELOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER m-2005-00041 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00020

    Original file (FD2003-00020.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    For this infraction and subparagraphs "b", "c", and "d" below you received an Article 15 on 3 Oct 01. b. .................... ..-..-..-..-..-..-.- 1 For this misconduct you received an Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. AF Form 3070,3 Oct 01 2.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00446

    Original file (FD2006-00446.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD 20762-7002 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used L AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2006-00446 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2001-0190

    Original file (FD2001-0190.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD00-0339 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FDO1-00190 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) 1. Reference Letter of Counseling dated 11 Mar 92.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0485

    Original file (FD2002-0485.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE PACIFIC AIR FORCES MEMORANDUM FOR SRAi .......................................... ........................................... 1 25 ASOS 11 Jul 01 FROM: 25 ASOSICC SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum - Addendum 1. Since I initially notified you, additional information has been obtained that supports your discharge for mental conditions that interfere with military service. b. I have been given an appointment to consult military counsel.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00037

    Original file (FD2003-00037.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0037 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: FD2003-00037 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 9 Feb 88 UP AFR 39-10, para 5-49d (Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense). Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation...