Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00090
Original file (FD2003-00090.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARlNG RECORD 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) 

GRADE 

AFSNISSAN 

1  TYPE 

1 

I 

1 

1 

MEMBERS SITTING 

Case heard at Washington, D.C. 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to a personal appearance withtwithout counsel. 

DD Fm  149 submitted.  The case will be forwarded to the AFBCMR for further processing. 

. . 

SAF/MNR 
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 

(EF-V2) 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCTI, 
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3"  FLOOR 
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 

Previous edition will be used. 

3.  Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of these 
recommendations are attached.  The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher 
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force.  If you are 
discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. 
2. You have the right to consult counsel.  Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. 
I have made an appointment for you to consult, the Area Defense Counsel, at Bldg. 368, ext 
6-5852, on 21 March 2002 at 1400 hours.  You may consult civilian counsel at your own 
expense. 

5.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.  Any statements you want the 
separation authority to consider must reach me within 3 duty days of the date of this letter, 
unless you request and receive an extension for good cause shown.  I will send them to the 
separation authority. 

6.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will 
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

7.  You have been scheduled for a physical examination on 26 March 2002 at 0800hours. 
You must report to Physical Exams Section in Building 700a.  Your appointment with Family 
Practice, Bldg 700a, on 26 March 2002 at 0750 hours to camplete paperwork.  You must be 
in uniform and have your medical records with vou. 

8.  You have been scheduled for an initial briefing at separations with Amn! . - - - - - - - - - - - -$ '  Bldg. 
905, extension 7-7348 on 22 March 2002 at 1230 hours.  Please bring an escort from your unit 
for assistance. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - -  

9.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974.  A 
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use at the Area Defense Counsel or your unit orderly 
room. 

Attachments: 

1.  Documents Supporting Discharge 

a.  LOC, dtd 14 Jul99 
b.  LOR, dtd 1 Oct 99 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00357

    Original file (FD2006-00357.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 15 Aug 01, Robins AFB, GA - Article 86. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00217

    Original file (FD2003-00217.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) =e. AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I feel I served enough time in service to recieve (sic) my MGIB.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00022

    Original file (FD2007-00022.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. 2900-0075 PRIVACY ACT INFORMATION: The law authorizes us to request the information we are asking you to provide on this form (38 U.S.C. d. you were, on 22 Apr 0 1, stopped by the Robins Air Force Security Forces personnel for excess speeding while on base and not having any automobile insurance.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0414

    Original file (FD2002-0414.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |} pppo02-0414 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. On 20 Dec 00, he received his second LOC for failure to go to his appointed place of duty on several occasions. Discharge the respefident with a general discharge, with or without probation and rehabilitation; or, c. Recommend to WR-ALC/CC that the respondent be discharged with an honorable discharge with or without probation and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0299

    Original file (FD2002-0299.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 Mar 00, you took the second final testing over CDC Course #3S051A and scored 55%. See Atch 5 Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00353

    Original file (FD2006-00353.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MI) 20162-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Prcvious edition will be used I 1 1 1 1 1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW ROAKO DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE N l l M D E R FD-2006-0034-3 GENERAL: 'I'he applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former SRA) (HGH SSGT) 1. I have made an appointment for you to consult with the Area Defense Counsel, 926-5852, at 1000 hours on 7 Mar 06.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00100

    Original file (FD2003-00100.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 I 1 1 I r AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE 1NITML) MEMBER SITTING GRADE AFSNISSAN I I AIC I Florida Department of Veteran's Affairs 1 ( ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 ( APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION I 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 HEARING DATE 19 Apr 2004 CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00219

    Original file (FD2006-00219.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    * Reason and Authority + Reenlistment Code SAFIMRHR 550 C S'I'WET WEST, S U H " 40 RANDOLPH AFR, T X 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE nlSCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WINC.3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MI> 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DEClSlONAL RATTONALE CASE NIJMBER FD-2006-00219 GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00160

    Original file (FD2005-00160.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for being disrespectful toward a TSgt on two separate occasions and for failure to go. The Commander could have used adjustment disorder as a narrative reason for discharge, but this would have resulted in the applicant having “Personality Disorder” on his DD Form 214 (not “medical” as the applicant desired). Supporting Documents LOC, 6 Feb 03 LOC, 6 Feb 03 Mental Health Evaluation Recommendations, 4 Jun 03 AF Form 3070, 17 Jul 03...

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00053

    Original file (FD2005-00053.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.