Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0299
Original file (FD2002-0299.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
i' 

t 

that test.  A passing score is 65%.  You had failed the first test.  See Atch 4.  You admitted you 
had not applied yourself, as you should have.  In an effort to pass the second fmal testing, you 
were again provided duty time for studying and you also studied an hour and half each day at 
home.  You were given pre-tests and there was a comprehensive review conducted of all the 
weak areas from the first test.  On 17 Mar 00, you took the second final testing over CDC Course 
#3S051A and scored 55%.  A passing score is 65%.  You had failed the second final testing.  See 
Atch 5 

Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this 
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction, or a higher 
authority, will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are 
discharged, how your service will be characterized.  If you are discharged, you will be ineligible 
for reenlistment. 

I 

3.  You have the right to consult counsel.  Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you. 
i  by telephone at Bldg 452, Tinker 
I have made arrangements for you to consult Capt: L - - - - - - - - - - - - .  
AFB - - - - - -  OK on 12 June 2000, at 0930 hours.  If it is necessary to change this appointment time, call 
Capti - - - - - -  is ofice at DSN 271-4774.  You may consult civilian counsel at your own expense. 

, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

4.  You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf.  Any statements you want the 
separation authority to consider must reach me by  14 June 2000, unless you request and receive 
an extension for good cause shown.  I will send them to the separation authority. 

5.  If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will 
constitute a waiver of your right to do so. 

6.  You are scheduled for a medical examination on 13 Jun 00 at 0645 hours, and you should 
report to the Tinker AFB, Hospital, Physical Exam Section, on that date for the examination. 

7.  Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974.  A 
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the orderly room. 

8.  Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to meimmediately. 

Attachments: 
1. LOR, dtd 5 Jan 00 
2.  Art 15, dtd 10 May 00 
3.  RIC, dated 1 1 Apr 00 
4.  CDC Failure #I 
5.  CDC Failure #2 
4  Acknowledgment Ltr 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0454

    Original file (FD2002-0454.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW Lc) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING ISSUES INDEX NUMBER Co J EXHIBITS SUBMITIED 10 THE BOARD A94.03 A49.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 9, | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 28 MAR 05 FD2002-0454 COUNSEL’S...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00198

    Original file (FD2003-00198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    T WEST, SUITE 40 AFB, TX 78150-4742 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00198 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00070

    Original file (FD01-00070.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommendation: Sign the attached memorandum directing the respondent's separation with an honorable discharge, without probation and rehabilitation. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to progress in on-the-job training. Copies of the documents to support this recommendation are attached and will be forwarded to the separation authority.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0279

    Original file (FD2002-0279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Digcharge to Reason and Authority for Discharge and Separation code (SPD) Issue 1: I understand that I failed to pass my career development course (CDC), however the separation code on my DD 214 is JHJ, Unsatisfactory Job Performance, which I feel misrepresents why I was separated. In this case, the Respondent’s commander has recommended he receive an honorable discharge. 4, Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0346

    Original file (FD2002-0346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |p 092-0346 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Basis for Action: The Commander, 78" Fighter Squadron, has recommended that qian alia: separated from the service with a general discharge for failure to progress in on-the- job training (OJT), under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section E, paragraph 5.26.3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00532

    Original file (FD2003-00532.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed. The Board concluded the reason for the discharge received by the applicant was appropriate. Now on to some of the issues concerning why I failed to adequately study the CDC's.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00333

    Original file (FD2006-00333.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the applicant received two Letters of Reprimand (failure to go) and an Article 15 for negligently failing to successfully progress in CDC program. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH AlC) 1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to progress in on-the-job training.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00363

    Original file (FD2006-00363.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justifjr a change of discharge. ISSUE: Applicant requests that the reason (unsatisfactory performance) for his discharge be changed to "Failure to progress in OJT" or "For the Convenience of the Ciovernment." I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0027

    Original file (FD2002-0027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD62-0027 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a Change in Reason and Authority for Discharge. The records indicated the applicant failed his CDC Course exam twice and was honorable discharged. RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated above, I recommend the respondent be discharged from the United States Air Force under AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section E, paragraph 5.26.3, with an honorable discharge, without P&R.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00386

    Original file (FD2006-00386.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenlisted as SrA 1 Mar 04 for 4 years. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for failure to progress in on-the-job training according to AFPD 36-32, Military Retirements and Separations, and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation ofAirmen, under the provisions of paragraph 5.26.3. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ civilian counsel.