Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0098
Original file (FD2002-0098.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

nh AIC
TYPE
PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW

COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES NO
Xx

 

 

 

 

 

 

VOTE OF THE BOARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN VOTHC OTHER DENY
X
xX
xX
xX
xX
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
A93.09 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
4 NOV 02 FD2002-0098 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

 

 

 

 

APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD’S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

REMARKS

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER

   

 

INDORSEMENT = DATE: 4 NOV 02
TO: FROM:
SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°” FLOOR

 

 

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pepo _goog

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right by failing to show at her appointed time. The case was reviewed as a non-personal
appearance.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety, which would justify a change of discharge.

The applicant's issues are listed in the attached brief.

ISSUE: The applicant does not contest her discharge, she only desires that her discharge be reviewed and
upgraded. The record indicates the applicant received an Article 15 for writing a bad check. In addition,
she received four Letters of Reprimand for a civil arrest for writing a bad check, failure to obey a lawful
order, failure to pay just debts, and failure to go. And, a Letter of Counseling, a verbal counseling, and a
Memorandum for Record for failure to pay just debts (twice), and failure to go. The DRB took note of the
applicant's duty performance as documented by her performance and other information contained in the
records. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's
duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons that were the basis
for this case. No inequity or impropriety in her discharge was suggested or found in the course of the
records review. Her misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members.
The Board concluded that the character and reason for discharge were appropriate due to her misconduct.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge or change the reason for discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be
changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0098

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former A1lC) (HGH A1C)

 

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 99/02/22 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Honorable
Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 76/03/11. Enlmt Age: 21 1/12. Disch Age: 22 11/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-95, E-53, G-50, M-19. PAFSC: 3P031 ~ Security Forces Apprentice,

DAS: 76/03/11.
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 97/04/30 ~ 97/05/06 (7 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enlisted as AB 97/05/07 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 09 Mo 16 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: AlC - 98/09/07
AMN - 97/11/07

ec. Time Lost: none.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 99/02/02, Eglin AFB, FL - Article 134. You did, within
the continential United States on or about 21 Nov 98,
make and utter to ------- a certain check, in words and

figures as follows, to wit: Check Nr. 340, in the
amount of $395.00, dated 21 Nov 98, for the purpose of
obtaining plane tickets, and did thereafter
dishonorable fail to maintain sufficient funds in the -
weoccce Bank for payment of such check in full upon its
presentment for payment. Forty five day extra duty and
a reprimand. (No appeal) (No mitigation)

e. Additional: LOR,UIF, 11 DEC 98 - Civil arrest for bad check.
LOR, 05 OCT 98 - Failure to obey a lawful order.
LOR, 05 OCT 98 - Failure to pay just debts.
MFR, 14 AUG 98 - Failure to pay just debts.
LOC, 10 AUG 98 - Failure to go.
LOR, 10 AUG 98 - Bad check.
VBC, O01 APR 98 - Failue to pay just debts.

f£. CM: none.

g. Record of SV: none.

(Discharged from Eglin AFB)
FD2002-0098

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (09) Mos (23) Das
TAMS: (01) Yrs (09) Mos (16) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/02/18.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

Issue 1: I would like an opportunity to have my discharge reviewed. During
the term I spent in the Air Force it literally changed my life. At the time of
my enlistment my income help to support my family in New York. I can honestly
say I did not know how to manage my money. My life outside of the military was
chaos. But through the help of the military family I was able to put my life
together. Being discharged ruined my sense of self. I had to find my place
again in society. Now the choice has come to correct something that in my eyes
was wrong. I would like to have a honorable discharge.

At this moment in my life I'm faced with a chronic liver disorder and colon
disorder. My time on earth is limited. When my family buries my (sic) I feel
I'm entitled to have that American Flag over my coffin. As I write this words

I'm struck to tears.

In conclusion, I served my country to the best of my ability and only wish to
have the discharge that promotes honor and gratitude. Thank you for reading my
"issues" and look at my file with an open mind and heart. Be not swayed with

the negative paperwork.

ATCH
none.

02/06/17/ia
OD BOI2~OS oS

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR ARMAMENT CENTER (AFMG)
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA

 

FEB 121999

MEMORANDUM FOR 96 ABW/CC @

 

FROM: AAC/JAJ

 

sal eview, AFI 36-3208 Administrative Discharge, ~
ab: ae 96 SFS (AFMC)

     

1, LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: I have reviewed the attached discharge package eimai...
(respondent). Subject to a medical determination that respondent is qualified for

worldwide duty, I find it legally sufficient to support a discharge under AFI 36-3208, chapter 5,
section H (Misconduct), paragraph 5.49, Minor Disciplinary Infractions.

2, INITIATION OF ACTION: On 5 Feb 99 QiaaganaaAlliiiine 96 SPS Commander,
notified the respondent that he was recommending the respondent be administratively discharged
for Minor Disciplinary Infractions under AFT 36-3208, chapter 5, section H, paragraph 5.49. Lt Col
Marchand recommends that the respondent receive a general discharge without probation and
rehabilitation (P&R). The respondent is not entitled to an administrative discharge board.

3. EVIDENCE CONSIDERED FOR THE GOVERNMENT: The respondent has engaged in
numerous acts of misconduct since 1 Apr 98. The acts of misconduct include three instances of
failure to pay her just debts, three instances of making or uttering a check without sufficient funds
in her account, failure to obey an order to remain at quarters to have a color television retrieved by
the vendor after payment had not been made on the television, and failure to go to her appointed
place of duty. For these acts of misconduct, the respondent received a verbal counseling, a letter of
counseling (LOC), a memorandum for record (MFR), four letters of reprimand (LOR), an
unfavorable information file (UIF), entry on the control roster, and punishment under Article 15,
UCM. Copies of the supporting documents are attached to the notification memorandum. (Tab 1)

4, EVIDENCE CONSIDERED FOR THE RESPONDENT: The respondent is a 22 year old
security forces journéyman who enlisted in the Air Force on 7 May 97. She was assigned to her
current unit on 10 Sep 97. The respondent submitted a statement to the commander, which
describes her background, states that she has taken steps to correct her financial problems, and

. highlights the volunteer work she has done since she joined the Air Force. The respondent
requests that she be given probation and rehabilitation. The respondent also included with her
statement the letters of four Air Force members (ranging in rank from SrA to MSgt), who
indicate that the respondent is a good airman and she deserves a second chance. Finally, the
respondent included copies of printouts indicating her participation in Consumer Credit
Counseling. (Tab 3)
Pp2eaZ —~BO Se

5.” DISCUSSION:

a. Separation Cuteria and Character of Discharge: Subject to a medical determination that
respondent is qualified for worldwide duty, the file is legally sufficient to support discharge

pursuant to AFPD 36-22 and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section H, paragraph 5.49. As the Special
Court-Martial Convening Authority you may take final action in this case. Discharge under
paragraph 5.49 can be described as honorable, general or under other than honorable conditions
(UOTHC). Anhonorable discharge would be appropriate when the member's service has been so
meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. A general discharge is
warranted when an airman’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of
the airman’s performance of duty outweigh positive aspects of the airman’s military record. A
UOTHC discharge is appropriate when there has been a pattern of behavior or one or more acts
or omissions that constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of airmen, Only
the General Court-Martial Convening Authority can approve a UOTHC or honorable service

characterization.

b. Probation & Rehabilitation (P&R): Respondent is eligible for P&R, under AFI 36-3208,
Chapter 7. P&R is limited to deserving cases, including those where the airman has demonstrated a

potential to serve satisfactorily, has the capacity to be rehabilitated for continued military service or
for completion of the current enlistment, or whose retention on active duty in a probationary status
is consistent with the maintenance of good order and discipline in the Air Force. The respondent
provided many statements attesting to her rehabilitative potential; however, the respondent’s
commander recommends against P&R. The file indicates that past rehabilitative efforts, as sét forth
in paragraph 3, have been unsuccessful. Consequently, P&R is not recommended in this case.

6. OPTIONS: As the Special Court-Martial Convening Authority in this case you have the
following options:

a. Disapprove the discharge action and retain the respondent;

b. Approve the discharge action and separate the respondent with a general discharge
with or without P&R;

c. Return the file to the unit with a recommendation to reinitiate the case with a
recommendation for a UOTHC discharge; or,

d. Approve the discharge action and refer the separation of the respondent with an
honorable discharge to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority for final

disposition.

7. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the respondent’s repeated misconduct and apparent
unwillingness to conform to Air Force policies, I recommend the respondent be discharged from
the United States Air Force under AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section H, paragraph .
5.49, with a general discharge, without P&R.

 

I have reviewed the attached discharge package and the foregoing recommendation. I concur in
the recommendation.

 

Attachment;
Case rings
Fp%o02~C° eo

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 96TH AIR BASE WING (AFMC)
EGLIN AIR FORCE BASE FLORIDA

 

FEB 05 1999

  
 

  

MEMORANDUM FOR sii
96 SFS

   
 

(AFMC)
FROM: 96 SFS/CC

SUBJECT: Nottfication Memorandum

1. [am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct,
specifically, Minor Disciplinary Infractions. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32
and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section H, paragraph 5.49. If my recommendation is
approved, your service will be characterized as honorable or general. I am
recommending that your service be characterized as general.

2. My reasons for this action are:

a. On or about 21 Nov 98, you wrote a check to Bluewater Blueshy Travel Inc in the
amount of $395.00 without sufficient funds in your account. For this incident you
received an Article 15 dated 3 Feb 99.

b. On or about 3 Dec 98, you were arrested by Okaloosa county Sheriff's Office for
passing a worthless check. For this incident you received a Letter of Reprimand (UIF)
dated 11 Dec 98 and this information was added to your exiting Unfavorable Information

File (UIE).

c. On or about 2 Oct 98, you failed to obey a lawful order when you failed to remain
at your quarters to have a 19 inch color television in which you failed to render proper
tender picked up at your quarters as you were instructed to do by your supervisor and
flight chief. For this incident you received a Letter of Reprimand dated 5 Oct 98. This
information was added to your Unfavorable Information File, and you were placed on the’

Control Roster.

- d. On or about 2 Oct 98, it was discovered that you had not paid in full your debt to
Travel World as you had agreed to in writing on 19 Aug 98. For this incident you
received a Letter of Reprimand dated 5 Oct 98, an Unfavorable Information File was
established, and you were placed on the Control Roster.
e. Onor about 11 Aug 98, it was discovered that yduox owed aa iii

» for phone calls you had made on her telephone andygiiiires

her telephone turned off unless she received the money that you owed. For this incident
you a Memorandum For Record dated 14 Aug 98 was placed in your Personal

Information File.

f. On or about 10 Aug 98, you failed to go at the time to your appointed place of
duty. For this incident you received a Letter of Counseling dated 10 Aug 98.

g. On or about 28 Jun 98, you wrote a check to Travel World for a plane ticket, in the
amount of $385.00 with insufficient fund in your account. For this incident you received
a Letter of Reprimand dated 10 Aug 98.

h. Onor about 1 Apr 98, you were verbally counseled by gilli:
failure to pay your just debts.

 

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The Commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a
higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force
and if you are discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged,
you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. Special pay, bonuses, or
education assistance funds may be subject to recoupment.

4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to
assist you. I have made an appointment for you to consu eee at
building 8, ext. 882-4185, on 5 Feb 99 at 1330 hours. You may consult civilian counsel
at your own expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you
want the separation authority to consider must reach me within 3 workdays from today
unless you request and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to
the separation authority.

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf, your failure
will constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

: 7. You will complete a medical examination with the 96th Medical Group on 8 Feb 99,
at 0715 hours.

8. You have been scheduled for an appointment with the 96th Mission Support
Squadron, separations section, on 5 Feb 99, at 1000 hours.

9. You are required to receive a briefing from the Family Support Center prior to your

separation. You have been scheduled to receive your Transition Assistance Management
Program (TAMP) briefing on 9 Feb 99, at 0830 hours.
ppzez-co FF

10. Immediately after r completion of your 96" Mission Support Squadron separations section
briefing report to the 96" Traffic Management Office with your completed AFDTC Form : 4134
or LGTT Office Form B133.

11. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of
1974. A copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in your unit orderly room.

 

2 Attachments: .

1. Supporting Documents

la. Article 15, dated 3 Feb 99
1b. LOR/UIF, dated 11 Dec 98
lc. LOR/UIF, dated 5 Oct 98
id. LOR/UIF, dated 5 Oct 98
le. MFR, dated 14 Aug 98

if. LOC, dated 10 Aug 98

1f. LOR dated 10 Aug 98

1f. MFR dated 1 Apr 98

2. Airman’s Acknowledgment

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00067

    Original file (FD2004-00067.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate his issues, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached. You have been scheduled for an appointment with the 96th Mission Support Squadron, separations section, on 26 Jun 98 hours.

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2001-00548

    Original file (FD2001-00548.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRETARY OF TSE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW HOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, IRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7062 SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pyp.7991-0548 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2001-0548 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00047

    Original file (FD2004-00047.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    , Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-0004, GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. For this incident you received a Record of Individual Counseling dated 27 Jan 98. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00025

    Original file (FD2003-00025.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant’s discharge should not be changed. As a result, you received a LOR, dated 8 Jun 99. Letter of Counseling, dated 23 Dec 98 | 3.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0392

    Original file (FD2002-0392.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    | yp7902-0392 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In the previous period of enlistment, member received an Article 15 for drinking alcohol under the legal age, and a Letter of Reprimand for using derogatory language toward another airman. RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set forth above, I recommend the respondent be discharged from the United States Air Force under AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, chapter 5, section H, paragraph 5.49, with a general discharge,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0320

    Original file (FD2002-0320.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0320 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. Direct that the respondent be discharged from the Air Force with a General discharge with or without probation and rehabilitation under AFI 36-3208, section H paragraph 5.49; c. Forward a recommendation for separation under paragraph 5.49 with an Honorable discharge to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority, AFSOC/CC (AFI 36-3208,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD01-00166

    Original file (FD01-00166.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    " - : . AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD s NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) | T GRADE AFSN/SSAN ine A1c |

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00427

    Original file (FD2003-00427.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY hay x zy * ey - ~~ x lie * ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ou ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION mlb [ro fe BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD HEARING...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00020

    Original file (FD2006-00020.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. Based on the respondent's repeated acts of misconduct as listed in paragraph 3, an honorable discharge is not appropriate. RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons set forth above, I recommend the respondent be discharged from the United States Air Force under AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.49, with a general discharge, without P&R.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0296

    Original file (FD2002-0296.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN AMN PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION MEMBERS SITTING Pe ei X RECORD REVIEW APDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ISSUES A92.15, A92.21, A93.11 INDEX NUMBER A47,00 HEARING DATE 03-01-03 CASE NUMBER FD2002-0296 REMARKS Case heard at Washington, D.C. ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...