Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0314
Original file (FD2002-0314.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
. ; oa AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
AB
PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES NO
t x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
_ x
tS x
Ws x
X
| :
Xx
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD ”
A94.05 A49,00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
|
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

 

T JAN 03 FD2002-0314 COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL. APPERANCE HEARING
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARD’S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REMARKS

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER

 

INDORSEMENT DATE: 7 JAN 03

 

 

 

TO; FROM: ~~ —]
SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3° FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
i

CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0314

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a Change in Reason and Authority for Discharge, and to change the
RE Code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Change in Reason and Authority for Discharge along with a change in the RE Code is denied.

The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety, which would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant contends that his discharge was too harsh in that he heard a rumor that if you fail out of
school, you get “reclassed” to another job. He also states that he was “young and dumb” and made the
worst mistake of his life. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base a change in reason and authority for discharge, or to change the RE
Code. The records indicate the applicant was discharged, Honorably, for having a repeated history of
unsatisfactory academic and military performance. The record also indicates that the member was afforded
every opportunity to progress and that his commander at that time stated the he does not believe the
applicant possessed the desire and motivation needed to succeed. Airmen are subject to discharge for
unsatisfactory performance based on documented failure to meet Air Force standards. Also, the DRB
recognized the applicant was 20 years of age when the discharge took place. However, there is no evidence
he was immature or did not know right from wrong. The Board opined the applicant was older then the
vast majority of first-term members who properly adhere to the Air Force’s standards of conduct. The
Board concluded that the characterization, reason and authority of the applicant’s discharge were
appropriate due to the unsatisfactory academic and military performance.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
change in reason and authority for discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0314

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a HON Disch fr USAF 02/04/17 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.26 (Unsatisfactory Performance). Appeals for Change in Reason and
Authority for Discharge and RE Code.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 82/04/17. Enlmt Age: 29 0/12. Disch Age: 20 0/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-44, B-20, G-39, M-23. PAFSC: 3E711 - Student.
DAS: 01/11/05.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 01/04/27 - 01/09/17 (4 months 21 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enlisted as AB 01/09/18 for 4 yrs. Svd: 00 Yrs 07 Mo 00 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: None.

¢. Time Lost: None,

d. Art 15’s: None.

e. Additional: AETC 125A, 22 MAR 02 - Repeated history of unsatifactory
academic and military performance.

£. CM: None.
gq. Record of SV: None.

(Discharged from Goodfellow AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR. |

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (00) Yrs (11) Mos (22) Das
TAMS: (00) Yrs (07) Mos (00) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appin (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/07/22.
(Change Discharge to Reason and Authority for Discharge and RE Code)

Issue 1: Hello, my name is ------- . I would like to request a moment of
your time. So please hear my story. I was stationed at Goodfellow AFB, TX from
11/2/01-5/17/02. I was there for Fire Protection Apprentice School. TI heard a
rumor on base that if you fail out of school, you get reclassed to another job.
I was in my middle block of school before I got washed back the first time.
FD2002-0314

Then, after that, I didn't try anymore.

I was trying to get reclassed, listening to other tech school students. I made
the worst mistake of my life. I was young and dumb. I washed out and I got
discharged. I know a mistake and that was wrong, in fact I apologize for
waisting (sic) your time and money.

I still want to be in the Air Force or Military, however. I was wondering if
you could help me because I love the Air Force and love serving my country. If
you believe what I say and in me than can you change my R.E. code to a 1 and
change my reason for separation other than an unsatisfactory performance,

please.

I believe in serving my country. Please help me to achieve what I believe.

ATCH
1. DD Form 214 (Member 1 & 4).

02/11/06/ia
fe e FDZEOR - 03/4

d. Probation & Rehabilitation: Probation and rehabilitation (P&R) is reserved for those
cases where an airman could change his ways through counseling and rehabilitation. In this case,

the commander states the Respondent does not possess the desire or motivation needed to
succeed in the Air Force. P&R at this point is unlikely to be successful and would not be

appropriate in this case.
e. Legal Sufficiency: This discharge package is legally sufficient. | i
4. 17 TRW/CC OPTIONS: As the SPCM you may: |
a. Retain Respondent in the Air Force;
b. Discharge Respondent with an honorable discharge, with or without P&R; '

c. Discharge Respondent with a general discharge, with or without P&R. t

5. RECOMMENDATION; I recommend you discharge Respondent with an honorable E
discharge IAW AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.26, without P&R.

 

I concur

 

t ent:
ie > ischarge Package
re € Poze0z ~ OB (i

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

 

MAR 7 § 2002

 

FROM: 312 TRS

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum

1. [am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Unsatisfactory
Performance. The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.26. If
my recommendation is approved, your discharge will be described as honorable or general. Iam
recommending that your service be characterized as honorable.

1. My reason for this action is:

On or about 22 Mar 02, you were disenrolled from course number X3ABR3E731-006 (Fire
Protection Apprentice) due to a repeated history of unsatisfactory academic and military
performance. You repeatedly informed instructors that you did not want to be here because you
realized that Fire Protection was a physically demanding job and that you wanted another job.
You are not recommeded for reclassification. This is documented on an AETC Form 125A and
the Student Training Report, dated 22 Mar 02

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher
authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force and, if you are
discharged, how your service will be characterized. If you are discharged you will be ineligible
for reenlistment in the Air Force and any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may
be subject to recoupment.

4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
I have made an appointment for you to consult with the Goodfellow AFB, Area Defense Counsel

on A fer dZ at_/000 hours in Bldg 308. You may consult civilian counsel at your own
expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements in your own behalf. Any statements you want the

separation authority to consider must reach me by A free at 09730 unless you request

and receive an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation authority.

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

7. You must report to the Physical Exams Section of the clinic during walk-in hours, Monday
through Thursday from 0730-1530 hours, for your medical examination:
PD2002- 83/4

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A
copy of AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the Unit Orderly Room.

 

- Attachments:
1. AETC Form 125A and Student Training Report, dated 22 Mar 02 (4 pages)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00288

    Original file (FD2005-00288.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received three Letters of Reprimand, three Letters of Counseling, one Memorandum for Record and nine AETC Forms 341 for various acts of misconduct to include non-compliance with Air Force standards, disobeying a direct order, failing room inspection, missing details, not having a i-lashlight in formation, failure to meet performance standards, lack of motivation, inability to follow instructions, failure to maintain accounting of materials, lack of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0136

    Original file (FD2002-0136.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE |} pp2992-9136 GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change his reenlistment code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0136 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1lC) (HGH A1C) 1. If my recommendation is approved, your discharge will be described as an Honorable Discharge and you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0403

    Original file (FD2002-0403.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force. ?s discharge from the !should be discharged with - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A% i :that she was 2. Attachment: Case File DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND FDZQBZ - o ~ 0 2 - 9 Mar 2000 MEMORANDUM FOR AB i L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . '

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00099

    Original file (FD2004-00099.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    So if you can find anyway possible to upgrade my General discharge to an Honorable discharge I would be very grateful. ATCH None DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND FROM: 334 TRSICC SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum 1. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0217

    Original file (FD2002-0217.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0217 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. After a thorough and complete consideration of the information submitted by the applicant, the applicant’s compelling personal testimony, and information contained in the record, the Board concluded there was sufficient mitigation and extenuation to substantiate upgrade of the discharge and to change the reason for the discharge. For this...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0491

    Original file (FD2002-0491.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0491 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0491 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0284

    Original file (FD2002-0284.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You, who knew of your duties, on or about 11 Aug 01, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain from consuming or possessing alcohol until over the age of 21 years, as it was your duty to do. Appropriateness of Discharge: a. Airmen are subject to discharge for unsatisfactory performance based on the documented failure to meet Air Force standards. Recommendation: Discharge Respondent with a general discharge without P&R by signing the letter at...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2007-00049

    Original file (FD2007-00049.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I X 78150-4742 AIR FORCE DlSCllARCE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND OR, EE WINC.,3RD rLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762 7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used .. AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-200,-00049 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change reason for discharge and to change the reenlistment code. 1 was in the Air Force and I failed the F-16 Tech School and they send (sic) me to Services and I...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0453

    Original file (FD2002-0453.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0453 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. AETC Form 173, 8 Apr 02 . AETC Form 173, 5 Apr 02 .

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0171

    Original file (FD2002-0171.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD FD2002-0171 (Former A1C) (HGH Al1C) (REHEARING) 1. Suspend an under honorable conditions (general) discharge and recommend Probation and Rehabilitation; c. Direct his discharge with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge; or d. Recommend that aici discharged with an honorable discharge. For this misconduct you received an AF Form 174 on 22 Aug 01. f. You did, at or near...