Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00304
Original file (FD2003-00304.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

* | NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE . AFSN/SSAN

Seeneiiiies AMN eee
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 RECORD REVIEW

: NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES No

x

MEMBER SITTING GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY

Xx

Xx

ISSUES 494 53 INDEX NUMBER Ay 67 19)
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

17 Dec 2003 FD-2003-00304

eS
>

Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR,.

SIGNATU

SAF/MRBR : SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WESTASUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2003-00304

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and
after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of
discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the
available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant was
habitually late to work or failed to go and received an Article 15, a vacation of suspended punishment, four
Letters of Reprimand, three Records of Individual Counseling, and four other memorandums documenting
her misconduct. In his recommendation letter, applicant’s commander stated that her repeated misconduct
was negatively impacting unit morale. At the time of the discharge processing, applicant consulted counsel
and submitted a statement requesting retention, or in the alternative, an honorable discharge. Additionally,
the discharge was delayed to resolve some medical issues. The records reflected applicant was evaluated for
a sleep disorder, but her sleep studies were inconclusive and ultimately a sleep disorder was ruled out and it
was determined her habitual lateness was volitional. Furthermore, applicant was found to have an
adjustment disorder with depressed mood, which would also have rendered her subject to administrative
discharge. The DRB opined that through the unit’s myriad administrative actions, the applicant had ample
opportunities to change her repetitive, negative behavior. The Board concluded the disciplinary infractions
were a Significant departure from the conduct expected of all military members, and found no evidence of
impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2003-00304
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

See (Former AMN) (HGH A1C)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 22 Mar 02 UP AFI 36-

3208, para 5.49 (Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for
Honorable Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 16 Sep 82. Enlmt Age: 17 7/12. Disch Age: 19 6/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-76, E-66, G-80, M-67. PAFSC: 3A031 - Information Management
Apprentice. DAS: 30 Mar 01.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 26 Apr 00 - 5 Jul 00 (2 months 10 days) (Inactive).
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 6 Jul 00 for 6 yrs. Svd: 1 Yrs 8 Mo 17 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: AMN - 18 Oct 01 (Vacation of Article 15, 7 Jan 02)
Alc - 18 Aug 00

c. Time Lost: None.

d. Art 15’s: (1) 07 Jan 02, Vacation, Tyndall AFB, FL - Article 86.
You, did, on or about 6 Dec 01, without authority, fail
to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of
duty. Reduction to Airman. (No appeal) (No mitigation)

(2) 18 Oct 01, Tyndall AFB, FL - Article 86. You, did, on
or about 3 Oct 01, without authority, fail to go at the
time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.
Suspended reduction to Airman, 30 days correctional
custody, and a reprimand. (Appeal/Denied) (No
mitigation)

e. Additional: LOR, 17 JAN 02 - Late for work.
LOR, 10 JAN 02 - Late for work.
LOR, 12 DEC 01 - Failure to go.
RIC, 11 DEC 01 - Late for work.
LOR, 13 SEP 01 - Late for work on 2 occasions.
LOR, 28 AUG 01 - Late for work and disobeying a lawful
order.
LOR, 20 AUG 01 - Late for work and failure to go.
LOC, 10 AUG 01 - Failure to go.
LOR, 09 AUG 01 - Late for work.
MEMO, 18 JUL 01 - Missed appointment.
RIC, 13 JUN 01 - Late for work, missing mandatory
FD2003-00304

formation, and disobeying a direct order.
RIC, 26 APR O01 - Late for duty.

£. CM: None.
g. Record of SV: None.

(Discharged from Tyndall AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (1) Yrs (10) Mos (25) Das
TAMS: (1) Yrs (8) Mos (17) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 10 Aug 03.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.

ATCH
None.

100CT03/ia
— FD2083- cn 304

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND

MEMORANDUM FOR A

 

JAN 25 2002.
FROM: 325 CS/CC

SUBJECT: Notification Memorandum—Administrative Discharge

1. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct: Minor
Disciplinary Infractions. The authority for this action is Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and
Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section H, para 5.49. If my recommendation is
approved, your service will be characterized as honorable or general. I am recommending your

service be characterized as general.
2. My reasons for this action are:

a. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 17 January 2002, without
authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: building 1003,
Base Information Transfer Center, as evidenced by a LOR dated 17 January 2002. (Atch 1a)

b. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 10 January 2002, without
authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: building 1003,
Base Information Transfer Center, as evidenced by a LOR dated 10 January 2002. (Atch Ib)

c. As evidenced by Vacation of Nonjudicial Punishment finalized 9 January 2002, a LOR
dated 12 December 2001, and a Record of Individual Counseling dated 11.December 2001:

1) You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 6 December 2001,
without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit:
building 1003, Base Information Transfer Center.

2) You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 12 December 2001,
without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit:
building 1003, Base Information Transfer Center. (Atch Ic)

d. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 13 December 2001,

without authority, fail to g0 at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit:
building 1003, Base Information Transfer Center, as evidenced by a MFR dated 13 December

2001. (Atch 1d)

e. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 3 October 2001, without
authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: building 1003,

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Fp AOD — (ed Zep

 

Base Information Transfer Center, as evidcnccd by an Article 15 finalized 31 October 2001.
(Atch le)

f. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 13 September 2001,
without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit:
building 1003, Base Information Transfer Center, as evidenced by a letter to you dated 13
September 2001, which you acknowledged receiving. (Atch If)

g. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 27 August 2001,
without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit:
building 1003, Base Information Transfer Center, as evidenced by a letter to you dated 28
August 2001, which you acknowledged receiving. (Atch 1g)

h. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 16 August 2001,

without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit:
building 1003, Base Information Transfer Center, as evidenced by a letter to you dated 20

August 2001, which you acknowledged receiving. (Atch 1h)

i. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 7 August 2001, without
authority, fail to go to a mandatory formation, as evidenced by a memorandum entitled “Letter of

Counseling” dated 10 August 2001. (Atch 1i)

j. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 7 August 2001, without
authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: building 1003,
Base Information Transfer Center, as evidenced by a LOR dated 9 August 2001. (Atch 1)

k. You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 18 July 2001, fail to go
to a mandatory medical appointment, as evidenced by a memorandum dated 1 August 2001.

(Atch 1k)

I. As evidenced by a Record of Individual Counseling dated 13 June 2001:

1) You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 4 June 2001, fail to
maintain your fingernails within acceptable standards of dress and appearance, in violation of

AFI 36-2903, after being told twice to fix them by your supervisor, SSgt @gggagaaas

2) You did, at or near Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 7 June 2001, 8 June
2001, 11 June 2001, 12 June 2001, and 13 June 2001, without authority, fail to go at the time
prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: building 1003, Base Information Transfer

Center. (Atch I])

m. You did, at Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, on or about 26 April 2001, without
authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: your
scheduled FTAC class, as evidenced by a Record of Individual Counseling dated 26 April 2001.

(Atch Im)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
FDACO5-aeo Sa

3. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction, or a
higher authority, will decide whether you wiil be discharged or retained in the Air Force. If you
are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and will probably be

denied enlistment in any component of the armed forces.

 

4. You have the right to consult legal counsel. Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist

you. An appointment has been made for you to consult Cap RRR Arca Defense
Counsel, Bldg. 1005 (3-2911) at \SeoOWes =O 2B ey oz. You may consult civilian

legal counsel at your own expense.

5. You have the right to submit statements on your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me within three (3) workdays unless you request and
receive an extension, in writing, for showing good cause. I will send them to the separation

authority.

6. If you fail to consult counsel or submit statements in your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

7. You have been scheduled for a medical records check as part of this discharge process. You
must report to the NCOIC, Physical Examinations, Building 1465, Monday, Tuesday, Thursday
or Friday between 1330 and 1500 to complete this medical records check.

8. You have been scheduled for a separations briefing. You must report to 325 MSS/DPMAR
(Separations) section at OB830 hye On ZB da.-Oz.

9. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act. A copy of
AFI 36-3208 is available for your use in the unit personnel office.

10. Execute the attached acknowledgment and return it to me immediately.

 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
/ : PPP eo8 GIB

/ Attachments:

la. LOR, dated 17 Jan 02
ib. LOR, dated 10 Jan 02
lc. Vacation Actions, dated 9 January 2002; LOR, dated 12 Dec 01; Record of Individual
Counseling, dated 11 Dec 01

-1d. MFR, dated 13 Dec 01
le. Article 15, dated 31 Oct 01
If. Letter, dated 13 Sep 01
1g. Letter, dated 28 Aug 01
th. Letter, dated 20 Aug 01
li. Memo “Letter of Counseling”, dated 10 Aug 01
1j. LOR, dated 9 Aug 01
ik. Memorandum, dated 1 Aug 01

~ IL. Record of Individual Counseling, dated 13 Jun 01
Im. Record of Individual Counseling, dated 26 Apr 01
2. Airman’s Receipt of Notification Memorandum

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

me

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00075

    Original file (FD2005-00075.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WMG, 3RD n O O R ANDREW'S AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00075 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. As evidenced by a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 6 Mar 03: You, did, at or near Panama City, Florida, on divers occasions, between on or...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0400

    Original file (FD2002-0400.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes the applicant's discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant received full administrative due process. -has orders, and failed to take responsibility for his actions. As the SPCM convening authority, you may: a. decide the case is without merit and retain' or b. order the case initiated again, extending the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0203

    Original file (FD2002-0203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE ay NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION MEMBERS SITTING AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A94.53 A67.10 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 03-01-10 FD2002-0203 Case heard at Washington, D.C. submit an application to the AFBCMR. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00340

    Original file (FD2006-00340.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A ~ C ) (HGH A1C) 1. DEPARTlcrlENT OF 'THE AIR FORCE AIR EDUCATION AND TRAINING COMMAND I 7 - MEMORANDUM FOR A1 C I.. -.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0397

    Original file (FD2002-0397.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN | TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ED " YES ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THEBOARD RS SITTING "HON | ‘GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY XxX Xx X x x ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A95,00 A67.10 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO:THE:BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE 26 FEB...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0394

    Original file (FD2002-0394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-0394 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0394 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. Direct discharge with a general discharge either with or without probation and rehabilitation, or c. Forward this file to 19AF/CC with a recommendation for an honorable discharge either with or without...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00100

    Original file (FD2003-00100.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 I 1 1 I r AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE 1NITML) MEMBER SITTING GRADE AFSNISSAN I I AIC I Florida Department of Veteran's Affairs 1 ( ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 ( APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 1 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION I 4 1 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1 HEARING DATE 19 Apr 2004 CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00424

    Original file (FD2003-00424.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former A1C) (HGH A1C) 1. Applicant's Letter to the Discharge Review Board. I am asking the board to please change my discharge to honorable and also change my enlistment status so that I may re-enlist into the Air Force Reserves.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0540

    Original file (FD2002-0540.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p7002-0540 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The Board noted that applicant signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on September 8, 1997) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. For your actions, you received a Letter of Counseling (LOC).

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00136

    Original file (FD2006-00136.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , * - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 v DATE: 12/8/2006 I TO: I SAFIMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 INDORSEMENT I I SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ~ - - - ~ ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077,...