Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0089
Original file (FD2002-0089.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00052

    Original file (FD01-00052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As a result, respondent received a Letter of Counseling, dated 17 Sep 9 3 . A n honorable discharge is the appropriate characterization when the airman's service has generally met Air Force standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for The authority for this action is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, Misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD01-00166

    Original file (FD01-00166.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    " - : . AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD s NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) | T GRADE AFSN/SSAN ine A1c |

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00321

    Original file (FD2006-00321.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS A m , MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE HEADQUARTERS 72D AIR BASE WING (AFMC) TINKER AIR FORCE BASE OKLAHOMA MEMORANDUM FOR 72 ABWICC FROM: 72 ABWIJA SUBJECT: Legal Review of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208 Discharge Action: -. I am recommending that your service be characterized as an Under Honorable Conditions (General) Discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0162

    Original file (FD2002-0162.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ppo002-0162 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Reenld as SRA 92/08/28 for 6 yrs. Recruiting is a career that was not for everyone and it was definitely not for me.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0117

    Original file (FD2002-0117.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | 92002-0117 GENERAL; The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. (2) On or about 26 May 95, the respondent failed to report for duty at the appointed time, for which he received a letter of counseling. The nature and frequency of the respondent's misconduct satisfy the intent of paragraph 5.49, and thus establish a basis to discharge the respondent.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00415

    Original file (FD2005-00415.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE: Applicant received a UOTHC Discharge - Discharge in Lieu of Court Martial Applicant contends she wishes to apply for and obtain veteran status and benefits for herself and her family and is considering reenlisting in the Air Force or Air Force Reserves before reaching the age of 28. h. Awards & Decs: AFTR i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (01) Yrs (04) Mos (06) Das TAMS: (01) Yrs (01) Mos (13) Das 4. PRSFERRAL b. GRADE LL Col e. ORGANIZATIDW OT ACCUSER 552d Training Squadron a DATE ------------ -...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0015

    Original file (FD2002-0015.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    INITIATION OF ACTION: C AFRL, Det 8/CC, recommends that A1C misconduct, specifically a pattern of misconduct, he further recommended that Respondent receive a general (under honorable conditions) discharge without an opportunity for probation and rehabilitation (P&R). RESPONDENT: Respondent, 21, has been in the Air Force for approximately two years and three months. I am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for misconduct, specifically, a pattern of misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00379

    Original file (FD2005-00379.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged with a general discharge for minor disciplinary infractions. As a result, yau received a Letter of Counseling, dated 10 Sep 92. See AtCh 3. d, On 19 Jan 93, you were drunk and disorderly a t Tinker AJ?B, OK. As a result, you received an U t i c l e 15, dated 3 Mazr 93.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0365

    Original file (FD2002-0365.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | b:9992-0365 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. b. Grade Status: A1C - 29 Aug 89 (Article 15, 29 Aug 89) SrA - 25 Feb 89 Alc - 25 Feb 87 Amn - 25 Aug 86 c. Time Lost: None. | Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 25 Feb 86 7.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0018

    Original file (FD2002-0018.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    For these acts of misconduct, he received a Letter of Counseling (LOC), dated 15June 1999, (Atch Ig) i a FD 2202~ 20/9 h. On or about 16 December 1998 and again on or about 21 December 1998, the respondent failed to report to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed. The respondent has received 2 LOCs, 3 LORs, and 2 Article 15s. Duringthat —, time period, the respondent received an LOR for being late to work on 7 Dee 99 (Atch Ic), and an - additional LOR for failing to obey a...