AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
‘4{ NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
AMN | pam,
PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
:| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
7 TC WOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBERS SITTING “HON |-GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
Te x
—— Trl
ral MM) ms) MK
ISSUES
A95.00
INDEX NUMBER
A67.10
EXHIBITS SUBMITTED: TO THE BOARD
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
cnc
HEARING DATE
20 JUN 03
CASE NUMBER
FD2002-0088
"FAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
CHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE,
a ue
fe APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND
REMARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.
TE RORDSDETTS
wee
ARE DISCUS ED ON THE ATTA!
re
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.
SIGNATURE OF RECO RDER eK BOARD PRESIDENT
SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
530 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AJR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°° FLOOR
. ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0088
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,
and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would justify a change of
discharge.
ISSUE: The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be completed based on the
available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant had an
Article 15 for writing bad checks. The record was missing the discharge paper work and the DRB wrote the
applicant on 22 Aug 02 and asked if he had additional information the board could use in reviewing his
case. The applicant did not submit any additional information. The Board concluded the disciplinary
infractions were a significant departure from the conduct expected of all military members. The Board
found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0088
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
"ee, (Former AMN) (HGH A1C)
“er MISSING DOCUMENTS
ir ie tl
1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 96/12/24 UP AFI 36-3208
(Misconduct). Appeals for Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 75/10/29. Enlmt Age: 17 10/12. Disch Age: 18 8/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-43, E-53, G-34, M-53. PAFSC: 2A333A - Tactical Aircraft
Maintenance Apprentice. DAS: 12/94. aS
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 93/09/18 -— 94/07/05 (9 months 18 days) (Inactive) .
3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Enlisted as AB 94/07/06 for 4 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 05 Mo 19 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 96/10/31 (Article 15, 96/10/31)
AlC - (EPR Indicates): 94/07/06-96/03/05)
AMN - 95/01/06
c. Time Lost: none.
d. Art 15's: (1) 90/10/31, Kadena AB, Japan - Article 134. You did, on
divers occasions from about 11 Sep 96 to about 18 Sep
96, make and utter to ------- certain checks, in words
and figures as follows, to wit: check #0203, dated 11
Sep 96, in the amount of $10.52; check #0204, dated 13
Sep 96, in the amount of $16.65; check #0205, dated 14
Sep 96, in the amount of $7.67; check #0205, dated 15
Sep 96, in the amount of $10.30; check #207, dated 16
Sep 96, in the amount of $10.97; check #0208, dated 18
Sep 96, in the amount of $4.34; check #0209, dated 18
Sep 96, in the amount of 68.96, for the purpose of
obtaining services, and did thereafter dishonorably
fail to maintain sufficient funds in the ------- Bank
for payment of such checks in full upon their
presentment for payment. Reduction to Amn. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
e. Additional: Unknown.
£. CM: none.
FD2002-0088
g. Record of SV: 94/07/06 — 96/03/05 Kadena Ka _tapdan)
(Discharged from Barksdale AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, AFOUA, NDSM, AFOSLTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (03) Yrs (03) Mos (07) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (05) Mos (19) Das
4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 01/01/11.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.
ATCH
none.
02/06/19/ia
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0193
ee AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN reece TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ~~ YES NO xX rela, nl VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ee ISSUES INDEX NUMBER oe SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A93.01 A67.10 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ~ HEARING...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0205
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN voTHC | OTHER | DENY ISSUES A 4.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.90 Fike ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE \ COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0237
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. The respondent consulted military defense counsel but has not submitted a statement in response to this discharge action. 16 Feb 95, counseling; 16 Mar 95, counseling; 2 Jun 95, counseling; 21 Oct 95,...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0534
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL; The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0534 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD anna: (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) ‘een, i z 1. On or about 4 Nov 95, you were incapacitatied for the proper performance of your duties as a result of prior overindulgence in alcohol, as evidenced by an Article 15, dated 4 Dec 95, (atch 2); c,...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0154
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0154 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. BASIS FOR THE ACTION: Administrative discharge action is based on the respondent's pattern of misconduct during his current enlistment. However, the respondent did consult with his ADC via telephone prior to responding to this action.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0229
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0229 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identify none that would justify a change of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0166
_ CASI ADMBERK AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pppo2-0166 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. e, Additional: LOR, 01 FEB 96 - Failed to obey order. For this infraction, you received a Record of Individual Counseling (RIC) on 23 Feb 96.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0156
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Applicant was discharged for misconduct, commission of a serious offense. In his written statement, AB aga@i¥requests that he not be discharged from the Air Force or if he is discharged, then he asks that he receive an honorable discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0305
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 \ CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any. The Board concluded member’s misconduct was an extremely significant departure from conduct expected of all military members, and further noted...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0160
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ppyoo.9160 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. RESPONDENT'S SUBMISSION: Respondent, a 23 year old Jaw enforcement apprentice, enlisted in the Air Force on 28 Feb-94. Retain respondent; b: Approve separation with a general discharge with, or without, P&R; c. Return the file to the unit with a recommendation to reinitiate the case with a recommendation for a UOTHC discharge; or, d. Forward...