Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0257
Original file (FD2002-0257.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
ccnsnautmmupbithitessnaas, AMN
TYPE
PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES NO
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN VOTHC OTHER DENY

 

 

 

 

 

   
  

    

INDEX NUMBER

A67.10 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

1

2 fs APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

A94.05

 

    

 

HEARING DATE

20 DEC 02

CASE NUMBER

FD2002-0257

 

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING
APPLICANT’S ISSUE AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONAL ARE PISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD.DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

 

 

 

 

 

   

REMARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to
submit an application to the AFBCMR.

The Board upgraded the discharge to Honorable and changed the Reason to Personality Disorder. The RE Code will not be
changed.

SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT

 

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER

rath

     

TO: FROM:
SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

350 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3°? FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0257

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of his discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: The discharge is upgraded to Honorable and the reason for discharge is changed to
Personality Disorder.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for minor disciplinary infractions. Applicant contends
he was suffering from attention deficit disorder, unknowingly at the time. The record indicates the
applicant received an Article 15 for disobeying a lawful order to wear a pressed uniform. He also received
two Letters of Reprimand for being late for work and failing to fulfill his responsibility to maintain his
dormitory room in a clean and orderly manner. After a thorough and complete consideration of the
information submitted by the applicant, and information contained in the record, the Board concluded there
was sufficient mitigation and extenuation to substantiate a change in the Reason for discharge, but did not
change applicant’s reenlistment code.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the

discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the board further concludes that the overall Reason for
discharge is more accurately reflected as Personality Disorder. The applicant’s discharge should be
upgraded to Honorable and the Reason for discharge should be changed to Personality Disorder.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0257
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

Se (Former AMN) (HGH AMN)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 89/11/03 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-46 (Minor Disciplinary Infractions). Appeals for Honorable Disch.

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 67/02/01. Enlmt Age: 20 6/12. Disch Age: 22 9/12. Educ: HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-32, E-80, G~66, M-70. PAFSC: 49131 - Apprentice Communications
Computer Systems Operator. DAS: 88/12/11.

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 87/08/05 - 88/06/02 (9 months 28 days) (Inactive) .

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:

a. Enlisted as AB 88/06/03 for 4 yrs. Svd: 01 Yrs 05 Mo 01 Das, all AMS.
b. Grade Status: AMN - 88/12/03

c. Time Lost: None.

qd. Art 15’s: (1) 89/08/16, Hickam AFB, HI - Article 92. You, having
knowledge of a lawful order issued by Capt ------ , to
wit: an order to wear a properly cleaned and pressed
uniform, dated 21 Apr 89, an order which it was your
duty to obey, did, on or about 01 Aug 89, fail to obey
the same by wearing an unpressed uniform. Suspended
reduction to AB, and forfeiture of $100.00 pay per
month for 1 month. (No appeal) (No mitigation)

e. Additional: LOR, 21 SEP 89 ~ Failing to fulfill responsibility to

maintain dormitory room in a clean and
orderly manner.
LOR, 21 JUL 89 - Late for work and dereliction of duty.

f£. CM: None.

gq. Record of SV: None.

(Discharged from Travis AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (02) Yrse (02) Mos (29) Das
TAMS: (01) Yrs (05) Mos (01) Das
FD2002-0257

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/06/14.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

Issue 1: My discharge was improper because I was accused of leaving a vault
door open where upon I proved that the lock was broken.

Issue 2: My discharge was improper because I was suffering from attention
deficit disorder unknowingly. (Documents enclosed)

ATCH

1. DD Form 214 (Member-4).
2. Medical Evaluation.

02/09/19/ia
ae | fYypze02- 2.5 7

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 15TH AIR BASE WING (PACAF)
HICKAM AIR FORCE BASE, HAWAII 96853-5000

 

1 80CT 1989

REPLY 10
ATTN OF; ~JA

SUBECT: Recommendation for Discharge -

 

1: CC

1. The recommendation for discharge of: eR ated by

the 1957th 4 on Group (ARGC) has been reviewed and found legally
sufficient. is being recommended for separation through

_ notification procedures under AFR 39-10, Paragraph 5-46, for misconduct. The
unit recommends a General Discharge without probation and rehabilitation. The
Respondent does not have a board entitlement. The letter of notification,
dated 5 October 1989, reflects a scheduled physical date of 1 November 1989.
That date is incorrect and should read 17 October 1989. The physical will be
attached to the file upon completion.

2. 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0049

    Original file (FD2002-0049.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD2002-0049 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. At the time of the discharge, applicant consulted counsel but failed to submit a statement in his own behalf. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: Upon discharge from the Air Force, I was informed that year, my General Discharge under Honorable Conditions would be upgraded to Honorable Discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0198

    Original file (FD2002-0198.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0198 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge, The records indicated applicant had four Letters of Reprimand for failure to pay a traffic fine, failure to go and failure to pay just debt (twice). Recommend to 8 AF/CC that the respondent be separated with...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0250

    Original file (FD2002-0250.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    e% CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD2002-0250 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, change of reason for discharge, and change of reenlistment eligibility (RE) code. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0250 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD ee (Former SRA) (HGH SRA) 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0270

    Original file (FD2002-0270.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | yp9992-0270 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. For the Respondent: Respondent has submitted a personal statement on his own behalf with 3 attachments (see tab 3) for you to consider when making your decision in his case, Respondent requests he be granted probation and rehabilitation, or if discharged, that his service be characterized as honorable, 3. Amn's Written Presenta- tion to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0077

    Original file (FD2002-0077.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) — GRADE AFSN/SSAN——s—~—

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0336

    Original file (FD2002-0336.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN hee SSGT TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES NO xX “VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY || rm) | mK) MK ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHIBITS SUBMITTED 10: THE BOARD A93.19 A67.50 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0264

    Original file (FD2002-0264.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0264 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The records indicated applicant had received three Article 15’s, one for entering a dormitory living quarters of a female, one for driving while drunk, and the third one for operating a vehicle when told not to. b. Grade Status: AB - 93/06/23 (Vacation of Article 15, 93/08/18) AMN - 93/06/23 (Article 15, 93/06/23) Alc - 92/10/10 c. Time Lost: None.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0267

    Original file (FD2002-0267.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢p9992-0267 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. The reasons for the proposed discharge action include the following: (1) on 20 Sep 89 (Apis ws derelict in the performance of his duties by failing to follow Tech Order procedures; (2) on 22 Sep 89, he fell asleep while transporting a Priority A resource and components; (3) on 16 Aug 89, he + failed to go to his appointed place of duty; (4) on...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0218

    Original file (FD2002-0218.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD02-0218 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Recommend to the General Court-Martial Convening Authority that the Respondent be discharged because of Misconduct, for the reasons alleged by the commander, with an Honorable Discharge, with or without probation and rehabilitation; c. Discharge the Respondent because of Misconduct, for the reasons stated by the commander, with a General...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0135

    Original file (FD2002-0135.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢y99.9135 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Attachment: Examiner's Brief FD2002-0135 : DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C} 1. Therefore, discharge is appropriate.