Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0135
Original file (FD2002-0135.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBERS SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ISSUES INDEX NUMBER

A93.01 AG67.90

 

 

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE

 

The | et

a.

 

LETTER OF NOTIFICATION

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER \"BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
23 AUG 02 FD2002-0135 COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

 

oe |

 

 

 

r TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case hear d at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance, and the right to submit an application to
the AFBCMR.

 

SIGNATURE OF RECORDER SIGNATURE OF BOA PRESID

SAF/MIBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL

 

 

 
 

 

 

340 C STREET WEST. SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3 3 FLOOR
ANDREWS AEB, MD 20762-7002
AFHO FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 . (EF-V2). Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | ¢y99.9135

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity
or impropriety, which would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant does not contest the discharge. He states that his behavior was due to his age and
maturity. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this
case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15
and a Vacation action on a suspended non-judicial punishment for negligently failing to maintain
automobile insurance while on an Air Force installation, possessing alcoholic beverages in the dormitory
while under the age of 21 and for possessing an unauthorized weapon in the dorm. The applicant also
received three Letters of Reprimand for failure to go, and one Record of Individual Counseling for failure to
go. The Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of
discharge. The DRB recognized the applicant was 20 years of age when the discharge took place.
However, there is no evidence of record to indicate he was immature or did not know right from wrong.
The Board opined the applicant was as old as the vast majority of first term members who properly adhere
to the Air Force standards of conduct. The Board concluded this issue was without merit. The Board
concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0135

: DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former AMN) (HGH A1C}

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 00/11/28 UP AFI 36-3208,
para 5.50.2 (Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and
Discipline). Appeals for Honorable Disch. ,

2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 79/12/24. Enimt Age: 17 8/12. Disch Age: 20 11/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-79, E-67, G-50, M-58. PAFSC: 25051 - Supply Management
Journeyman. DAS: 99/04/09. ,

b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 97/09/12 - 98/06/16 (9 months 5 days) (Inactive).

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW::.
a. Enlisted as 98/06/17 for 4 yrs. Svd: 02 Yrs 05 Mo 12 Dag, all AMS,

b. Grade Status: AMN - 00/07/14 (Article 15, Vacation, 00/08/23)
Alc - 99/10/17 .
AMN - (EPR Indicates): 98/06/17-00/02/16

c. Time Lost: none.

d. Art 15's: (1) 00/08/23, Vacation, Offutt AFB, NE - Article 92. You,
who should have known of your duties, on or about 7 Aug
00, were derelict in the performance of those duties in
that. you negligently failed to maintain your automobile
insurance while on Offutt AFB, as it was your duty to
do. Reduction to Amn. (No appeal) (No mitigation)

(2) 00/07/14, Offutt AFB, NE - Article 92. You, who knew
of your duties, on or about 18 Jum 00, were derelict in
the performance of those duties in that you willfully
failed to refrain from possessing alcoholic. beverages
in the dormitory while under the age of 21, as it was
your duty to do. You, who knew of your duties, on or
about 18 Jun 00, were derelict in the performance of
those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain
from possessing an unauthorized weapon in your
dormitory, as it was your duty to do. Forfeiture of
$100.00 pay per month for 2 months. Reduction to Amn
(suspended until 13 Jan 01). (No appeal) (No
mitigation) -

e. Additional: LOR, 21 FEB 00 - Failure to go.
Ric, 20 JUN 00 - Failure to go.
FD2002-0135

LOR, 14 JUL 00 - Failure to go.
LOR, 17 OCT 00 - Failure to go.

f. CM: none.

g. Record of SV: 98/06/17 - 00/12/16 Offutt AFB 4 (Initial)
(Discharged from Offutt AFB)

h. Awards & Decs: AFTR, SAEMR, AFOUA.

i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (03) Yrs (02) Mos (17) Das
TAMS: (02) Yrs (05) Mos (12) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/03/06.
(Change Discharge: to Honorable)

Issue 1: I am applying for an upgrade of my discharge from General to
Honorable. I have been striving for the past year and a half to better my life
and find some success in the world since my discharge in late November of 2000.

As of now, I am working two jobs to speed up the process of paying off some
bills that I have. Both of these jobs are located in the Boise Airport. The
first is for ------- , who is currently in charge of security at the Boise
Airport. This job has the potential of becoming a decent career for me since it
will be turning into a4 Federal job in November of this year. Yet I fear that my
General discharge may hold me back from transferring over to a Federal employee
along with my coworkers.

My second job is a part-time position at -------. I took this job because I
knew from prior experience that they would be flexible with the hours that I

could work for them, and would be able to work around the schedule for my other
job.

‘IT realize that my behavior and actions while in the service at Offutt AFB were
unacceptable and even childish. Yet since then I have grown as an individual

and have strived hard to succeed in the areas that I was lacking. I now have

the hopes and dreams of doing something positive with my life, and building a

future for myself. A realization that I wish I would have made years ago.

I know now what is expected of me as an individual and a citizen, and only hope
that through my hard work and effort I can rebuild my life and become a better
person for it. The°upgrade of my discharge will be the first 6f many large
steps I will have to take in life, and will help insure me a promising future.

Please take into consideration my hard work and perseverance since the time of
my discharge and help me begin to build a bright future for myself.
FD2002-0135

ATCH
1. Letter to Discharge Review Board.

02/07/09/ia
oo PD2ea2-0 JIS”

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS 55TH WING (ACC)
OFFUTT AIR FORCE. BASE, NEBRASKA

 

MEMORANDUM FOR 55 WG/CC 91 NOV 2000

FROM: 55 WG/JA

  

   
 
 
 

SUBJECT: Legal Review: Administrative Discharge Action--Amnifil ee

 

 

Mrreceive a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation (P&R).

2. RESPONDENT: ‘The respondent is a twenty year old Mobility Element Apprentice. He has
completed two years and four months of his four year enlistment (Date Enlisted: 17 June 1998) and
was assigned to his unit on 9 April 1999. ‘This is his first enlistment.

3. REASONS FOR DISCHARGE:

 

a. On 21 February 2000, the respondent was late for work. For this incident he received a
Letter of Reprimand.dated 9 March 2000.

— b. On 15 June 2000 and on 16 June 2000, the respondent was late for work. For these incidents
he received a Record of Individual Counseling dated 20 June 2000.

c. On 14 July 2000, the respondent was late for work. For this incident he received a Letter of
Reprimand dated 14 July 2000.

d. On 18 June 2000, the respondent possessed alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21.

e. On 18 June 2000, the respondent possessed an unauthorized weapon (a paintball gun) in his
dormitory room.

For the incidents listed in paragraphs d and e the respondent received Nonjudicial Punishment dated
14 July 2000, consisting of forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 2 months and reduction to the
grade of Airman suspended through 13 January 2001,

f. On 7 August 2000, the respondent failed to maintain his automobile insurance, For this
incident he received Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment dated 23 August 2000,
consisting of reduction to the grade of Airman, with a new date of rank of 14 July 2000.
_. Pp2e02-3/3 5

g. On 16 October 2000, the respondent was late for work.
h. On 17 October 2000, the respondent was late for work.

For the incidents listed in paragraphs g and h the respondent received a Letter of Reprimand dated
17 October 2000.

We

 

4. RESPONDENT’S SUBMISSION: By letter dated 5 April 2000, the respondent consulted with
counsel, and submitted a statement. In his statement, Amn 4 asks to be retained in the Air
Force or to be given a period of Probation and Rehabilitation.

5, ERRORS AND IRREGULARITIES: None.

 

6. DISCUSSION:

 

a. Basis for Discharge: Under AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2., airmen are subject to discharge
for a pattern of misconduct which is prejudicial to good order and discipline. This includes conduct
of a nature that tends to disrupt order, discipline, or morale within the military community. The
misconduct usually involves causing dissent, disruption, and degradation of mission effectiveness.
In this case, the respondent’s eight incidents of misconduct provide a sufficient basis for discharge.

b. Appropriateness of Discharge: ‘The respondent has committed a number of offenses during
his time in the Air Force for which he has received one Record of Individual Counseling, three
Letters of Reprimand, Nonjudicial Punishment, and Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment.
His misconduct is not consistent with good order and discipline, and is detrimental to morale.
Therefore, discharge is appropriate.

c. Characterization of Service: Table 1.3 to AFI 36-3208 provides that discharges for
Misconduct--Pattern of Misconduct may be characterized as honorable, general, or under other than
honorable conditions. A general discharge is appropriate when significant negative aspects of an
airman's conduct or duty performance outweigh positive aspects of the airman’s military record.
The respondent’s eight incidents of misconduct clearly outweigh the positive aspects of his military
career. Accordingly, a general discharge is appropriate.

 

d. Probation & Rehabilitation: The respondent is eligible for P&R under AFI 36-3208,
Chapter 7. The initiating commander does not recommend P&R. While most of his misconduct
centers around being late for work, he has also received Nonjudicial Punishment for possessing
alcoholic beverages under the age of 21 and possessing an unauthorized weapon in his dormitory
room, If the only issue was.his lateness for work, then P&R might be considered. However, given
the respondent’s actions, it appears that he is unable or unwilling to adhere to Air Force standards of
conduct. An additional opportunity for rehabilitation through P&R is not warranted.

e. Legal Sufficiency: This action is legally sufficient.

7. OPTIONS: As the special court-martial convening authority, you may:
| Ppzee2- 0/35

a. Retain the respondent;
b. Approve discharge with a general discharge with, or without, P&R;

c. Return the file to the unit with a recommendation that the respondent be processed for
discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge; or

d. Forward the file to the general court-martial convening authority with a recommendation for
an honorable discharge with, or without, P&R.

without P&R, and, due to the nature of his discharge, he be barred from Offutt Air Force Base for a
period of one year from the date of his discharge.

    

?

Acting Staff Judge Advocate
3 ‘Pp zea - 0/35—

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS 55TH WING (AGC)
OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, NEBRASKA

   

MEMORANDUM FOR AMN 3
FROM: 55 SUPS/CC
SUBJECT: Letter of Notification

1. Iam recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for Misconduct--Pattern of
Misconduct. The authority for my recommendation is AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208, paragraph
5.50.2. If my recommendation is approved, your service will be characterized as honorable or
general. Iam recommending that your service be characterized as general.

2. My reasons for this action are:

a, On or about 21 February 2000, without authority, you failed to go to your appointed place of
duty at the time prescribed. For this incident you received a Letter of Reprimand dated
9 March 2000. (Atch 1-1)

b. On or about 15 June 2000 and on or about 16 June 2000, without authority, you failed to go to
your appointed place of duty at the time prescribed. For this incident you received a Record of
Individual Counseling dated 20 June 2000. (Atch 1-2)

¢. On or about 14 July 2000, without authority, you failed to go to your appointed place of duty
at the time prescribed. For this incident you received a Letter of Reprimand dated 14 July 2000.
(Atch 1-3) .

d. You, who knew of your duties at or near Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, on or about
18 June 2000, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain
from possessing alcoholic beverages in the dormitory while under the age of 21, as it was your duty
to do.

e. You, who knew of your duties at or near Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, on or about
18 June 2000, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you willfully failed to refrain
from possessing an unauthorized weapon in your dormitory, as it was your duty to do.

For the incidents listed in paragraphs d and e you received Nonjudicial Punishment dated
14 July 2000, consisting of forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 2 months and reduction to the
grade of Airman suspended through 13 January 2001. (Atch 1-4)
» FD 2E02- O(35 —

f. You, who should have known of your duties at or near Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, on or
about 7 August 2000, were derelict in the performance of those duties in that you negligently failed
to maintain your automobile insurance while on Offutt Air Force Base, as it was your duty to do.
For this incident you received Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment dated
23 August 2000, consisting of reduction to the grade of Airman, with a new date of rank of
14 July 2000. (Atch 1-5)

g. On or about 16 October 2000, without authority, you failed to go at the time prescribed to
your appointed place of duty.

h. On or about 17 October 2000, without authority, you failed to go at the time prescribed to
your appointed place of duty.

For the incidents listed in paragraphs g and h you received a Letter of Reprimand dated
17 October 2000. (Atch 1-6)

3, Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this
recommendation are attached. The commander exercising special court-martial jurisdiction or a
higher authority will decide whether you will be discharged or retained in the Air Force. [f you
are discharged, you will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force and probably any other
branch of the military.

4. You have the right to consult counsel. Military Iegal counsel ‘4 becn obtained to assist you. |
have made an appointment for you to consult a aaa . Me Ide 323C, RM 302,

Phone 4-3939, at_ /030 on_¢ Mit dd You may c consult civilian counsel at your own
expense.

   

 

5. You have the right to submit statements on your own behalf. Any statements you want the
separation authority to consider must reach me by _¥ A/oY 20 unless you request and receive
an extension for good cause shown. I will send them to the separation authority,

6. If you fail to consult counsel or to submit statements on your own behalf, your failure will
constitute a waiver of your right to do so.

7. You have been scheduled for a medical examination. You must report to the 55th Medical
Group, Physical Exams, Room 115, Building 527 (Fairchild Hall) at {309 on

7 Nov 0 for the examination, Please pick up your medical records 24 hours prior to your
appointment.

8. You have been scheduled for an initial separation appointment. You must report to the 55th
Mission Support Squadron, Separations and Retirements Section, Room 235, Bldg 323C, at

WHO on Nov HO with your escort.

9. You have been scheduled for a pre-separation briefing. You must report to the Family Support

Center at_{440 on__(3 Av for the briefing.
| FD2002-0/39—

TRAE ML Nat dt eA ET oe ee Bes Soe weal cee

10. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy Act of 1974. A copy
of AFI 36-3208 is available-for your use in the unit orderly room.

11. Execute the acknowledgment provided and return it to me immediately.

 

 

Attachments:
Atch 1-1; Letter of Reprimand dated 9 Mar 00

Atch 1-2; Record of Individual Counseling dated 20 Jun 00
Atch 1-3; Letter of Reprimand dated 14 Jul 00
Atch 1-4; Nonjudicial Punishment dated 14 Jul 00

Atch 1-5; Vacation of Suspended Nonjudicial Punishment dated 23 Aug 00
Atch 1-6; Letter of Reprimand dated 17 Oct 00

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0034

    Original file (FD2002-0034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this case, the respondent’s four incidents of misconduct provide a sufficient basis for discharge. Approve discharge with a general discharge with, or without, P&R; c. Return the file to the unit with a recommendation that the respondent be processed for discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge; or d. Forward the file to the general court-martial convening authority with a recommendation for an honorable discharge with, or without, P&R. RECOMMENDATION: |...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0256

    Original file (FD2002-0256.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES: The applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Misconduct — Drug Abuse. 02/09/23/cr ‘SEP 19 ’@2 @9:130M OFFUTT AFB LEGAL OFC a P.3/15 FIP 2002~ O2r¢g¥ Bo age DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE = HEADQUARTERS 55TH WING (ACC) OFFUTT AIR FORCE BASE, NEBRASKA 8 JUN ane MEMORANDUM FOR 55 WG/CC FROM: 55 WG/JA - SUBJECT: Legal Review: Administrative Discharge Action--SaiaiiORRSIRANnONIttAI a, 1. RECOMMENDATION: I recommend the respondent be discharged with a general discharge without...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00258

    Original file (FD2003-00258.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFRBCMR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2003-00508

    Original file (FD2003-00508.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AMN) (HGH A1C) 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: On 9 Sep 97 I was discharged from...

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0249

    Original file (FD2002-0249.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also, the applicant believes his discharge was improper because of the lack of education on using prescription drugs, The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropnety or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. In this case, the respondent submitted a statement attempting to show that he meets all of the seven retention criteria, in addition to numerous character letters. Therefore, discharge is appropriate.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0024

    Original file (FD2002-0024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated applicant had received a Letter of Reprimand for Adultery and found guilty by a Summary Court Martial for Adultery. Discharge is appropriate. (Atch 1-1) Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation authority in support of this recommendation are attached.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00084

    Original file (FD2003-00084.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record indicates the applicant received an Article 15 for making a false official statement and for writing bad checks. She also received three Letters of Reprimand for financial irresponsibility, leaving the work section without proper authorization and lying about it, failure to report back to her duty section after an appointment and making a false official statement, and failure to comply with training restrictions by driving a privately owned vehicle and wearing civilian clothes. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00299

    Original file (FD2006-00299.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME O F SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) MEMBER SITTING + J - + L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . The records indicated the applicant had a Special Court Martial and was found guilty of unlawfully entering the dwelling unit of a female; being drunk and disorderly; and committing an indecent assault upon a female. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00082

    Original file (FD2003-00082.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | 3003-00082 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change her reenlistment code. The Board will also review the case to determine whether there are any issues that provide a basis for upgrading your discharge. (Atch 1-2) c. On or about 20 June 2000, without authority, you failed to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty.

  • AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0014

    Original file (FD2002-0014.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Change Discharge to Honorable) FD2 0 02 - 0 0 14 Issue 1: In recent years I have come to realize the mistakes I made while enlisted in the United States Air Force. AB b. discharge is appropriate.