AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.
CASE NUMBER
FD-01-00009
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.
The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.
The Board finds that neither evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or
impropriety which would justifl a change of discharge.
The applicant's issues are listed in the attached brief.
Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. The records indicated the
applicant received two Article 15s for misconduct during his last enlistment. The misconduct included
operating a vehicle while drunk on two different occasions. The DRB opined that through these administrative
actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the
misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of
the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.
Issue 2. Applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service.
The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of
recommendation and other information contained in the records. They found the seriousness of the willful
misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge
was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.
Issue 3 applies to the applicant's post-service activities. The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was
doing well and has been an active member with the local Alcoholic's Anonymous (AA) since 1995. However,
no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the
misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.
CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
[n view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, tbus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.
-
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE
A I R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD
(Former AMN)
FD-01-00009
l . MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec’d a GEN Disch fr USAF 91/01/02 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-49d (Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense). Appeals for Honorable
Disch.
e-
2 . BACKGROUND:
a. DOB: 57/10/31. Enlmt Age: 17 6/12. Disch Age: 33 2/12. Educ:HS DIPL.
AFQT: N/A. A-41, E-45, G-66, M-32. PAFSC: 74131 - Apprentice Fitness &
Recreation Specialist. DAS: 90/01/19.
b. Prior Sv: AFRes 75/05/16 - 75/10/06 (4 months 21 days) (Inactive).
(2) Enld as AB 75/10/07 for 4 yrs. Reenld 79/06/15 for
4 yrs. Ext 81/11/25 for 1 month. Ext 82/01/21 for 28 months. Ext 82/04/27 for
10 months. Reenld 83/05/27 for 4 yrs. Ext 87/04/16 for 3 months. Svd: 11 yrs
10 months 19 das, all AMs. AMN - 76/02/07. A1C - 76/10/07. SRA-(APR
Indicates): 78/06/19-78/10/29. Sgt-(APR Indicates): 79/07/22-80/07/21. SSgt -
85/08/01. Sgt - 86102/24 (ART 15, Vacation, 86/05/12). APRs:
8 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 6 , 8 .
ART 15: 86/05/19, Vacation, Vance AFB, OK - Article 86. You
did, o/a-8 May 86, w/o auth, fail to go at the time
prescribed to your appointed place of duty. Rdn to Sgt.
(No appeal) (No mitigation).
86/02/24, Vance AFB, OK - Article 86. You did, o/a 14
Feb 86, w/o auth, fail to go at the time prescribed to
your appainted place of duty. Rdn to Sgt (susp til 23
Aug 86), forfeiture of $50.00, and 14 days restriction.
(No appeal) (No mitigation).
3 .
SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
-
a. Reenld as SGT 87/08/26 f o r 4 yrs. Ext: 89/01/04 f o r 12 months. Svd: 3
Yrs 4 Mo 7 Das, all AMs.
-
b. Grade Status: AMN - 90/10/26 (ART 15, 90/10/26)
A1C - 88/04/08 (ART 15, 88/04/08)
c . Time Lost: none.
d. Art 15’s: (1) 90/10/26, Lackland AFB, TX - Article 111. You did, o/a
18 O c t 90, at or near Gate #3 operate a vehicle, to wit:
a passenger car, while drunk. Rdn to Amn, forfeiture of
mol-00009
$189.00 pay and 14 days extra duty. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
( 2 ) 88/04/08, Vance AFB, OK - Article 111. You did, o/a
2 Apr 88, on Gott Road, operate a vehicle, to wit: a
passenger car, while drunk. Rdn to AlC, forfeiture of
$200.00 pay per month for two (2) months ( s u ~ till 4
Oct 88), and 30 days restriction. (No appeal)
(No mitigation)
e. Additional: none.
f. CM: none.
g. Record of SV: 87/05/24 88/01/21 Vance AFB
88/01/22 89/01/21 Vance AFB
89/01/22 89/05/30 Vance AFB
89/05/31 90/05/30 Lackland AFB 4 (Annua1)REF
9 (CRO)
9 (Annual)
3 (CRO)
(Discharged from Lackland AFB)
h. Awards & Decs: AFAM, AFOUA W/2 BOLCs,
AFGCM W/3 BOLCs, AFOSSTR,
AFOSLTR, AFLSAR W/2 BOLCs, AFTR.
i. Stmt of Sv: TMS: (15) YKS ( 7 ) Mos (17
TAMS: (15) Yxs (2) Mos (26
Da s
Da s
c
4 . BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD F'm 293) dtd 00/11/22.
(Change Discharge to Honorable)
Issue 1: I, ------- , would like to get my Discharge upgraded to Honorable,
from General under Honorable conditions. I was in the Military for 15 yrs and
was a credit to the Air Force. I am an Alcoholic and have been an active member
in Local A.A.'s and had counseling since 1995. I do need to apologize to the
Air Force of my conduct because of what Alcohol had done to me (mainly DUI's).
The Air Force tried to help me, but I was not ready to help myself. I have
since 1995 and always had on my mind that I would like to try and update my
discharge. So I am pleading for your help now in this matter.
ATCH
1. Personal Letter to the Discharge Review Board.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE MILITARY TRAINING CENTER (ATC)
LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE TX 78236-5000
REPLY TO
AlTN of
SUBJECT
TO.
JAC
3700 ABG/CC
AFMTCICC
IN TURN
AFR 39- 10. Paragraph 5-49d,
1 8 DEC I990
c
reviewed the administrative discharge file regarding
including his conditional waiver of a discharge boar
it legally sufficient subject to a medical determination that the
respondent is qualified for worldwide duty and separation.
commander has recommended that he be discharged from the Air
2 .
Fo
9-10, paragraph 5-49d, for commission of a
other serious offenses. His commander has recommended that
receive a general discharge without probation and rehabilitation. The
alleged basis of the discharge action is the respondent's 18 October 1990
drunken driving at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, for which he received
nonjudicial punishment on 26 October 1990.
3. After recceiving the letter of notification, the respondent consulted
counsel and submitted a waiver oi his right to have hig case heard by a
di8charge board, conditioned upon his receipt of no less than a general
discharge.
4. There are no errors or irregularities materially affecting a substantial
right of
as been on continuous active service with the Air Force since
His current'term of enlistment began on 26 August 1987, for
5.
7
a period of four years. The respondent's most recent enlisted performance
report, for the period of 31 May 1989 through 30 May 1990, reflects a '4'
rating. His other enlisted performance report has a '3' rating. Eleven,of
his sixteen airman performance reports bear overall '9' ratings. Four of Lis
appraisals have overall ' 8 ' ratings. The remaining report has an overall '6'
rating.
6 . The alleged basis for discharge is sup
evidence. The evidence clearly shows that
for which a punitive discharge is authoriz
Courts-Martial.
reponderance- of the
ngaged in misconduct
Manual for
7. If it is determined the a
sufficient basis to dischar
his entire milit
discharged. I f
characterized. The determination of his service characterization may be
ber 1990 misconduct is a
r commission of a serious offense,
d to decide whether he should be
is service must also be
based only upon his military record since 26 August 158’7. A general
di
a t
as
rehatilltative efforts indicates that probation and rehabill tatlon is not
appropriate.
ropriate in this caae because the pligriii icar,t negative aspect.
conduct during hlpl current enlistment outweighs the-poeitive
record during that time. His very poop response t o -
c-
8. This action was processed in accordance with the procedures set out in
AFH 3Ei-10, Chapter 6, Section C, B0ar.d HeaPlllg or Board Waiver. Pureuarit, d a
paragraphs 6 - 17 and 6- I5 thereof and paragraph 6- 28: .
a. 3700 ABG/CC, as convening authority, may take one of the following
actions:
1. Retain the respondent;
2 . Forward the file to AFMTC/CC with a recommendation f o r approval
of an honorable discharge, with or without probation and rehabilitation;
3 . Forward the file to AFMTC/CC-with a recommendation f o r approval
of a general discharge, with or without probation and rehabilitation; or
4 . Reject the conditional waiver and direct that the respondent be
afforded the 6pportunity to submit an unconditional waiver or request a
discharge board hearing.
b. AFMTCICC, as separation authority, may take one of the following
actions:
1. Retain the respondent;
2 . Accept the waiver and approve an honorable discharge, with or
without probation and rehabilitation;
3. Accept the waiver arid approve a general discharge, with O F
without probation and rehabilitation; o r
4 . Reject the conditional waiver and direct that the respondent be
afforded the opportunity$o aubmit an unconditional waiver or requeet a
discharge board hearing -
I recommend that 3700 ABG/CC forward the file to AFMTC/CC with a
9 .
recommendation for acceptance of the waiver and approval of a general
discharge, without probation and rehabilit
AFMTC/CC accept the waiver and direct that
rther recommend that
be immediately
discharged from the Air Force with a general discharge, without probation and
rehabilitation.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 3700TH AIR B A S E GROUP (ATC)
LACKLAND AIR FORCE BASE TX 78236-5000
2'6 NOV 1990
REPLY TO
ATTNOF: c(zQ
-wBJECT: Noti f icatiarrletter
TO
-
1. .I a m recommending your discharge from the United State Air Force for
commission of a serious offense, other. s e r i o l e offenses according to AFR 39-
10, under tJhe provisions of paragraph 5-49d. Copiek of the documents to be
forwarded t,o the separati-on authority to support this recommendation are
attached.
My reason f o r this action is:
khat you did, at Lackland A i r Force Base,
2.
Texas, on or about 18 October 1990, at or near Gate #3 operate a vehicle t o
wit: a passenger car, while drunk, f o r which you received nonjudicial
punishmer,t on 26 October 1990. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the
separation authority i n slippoi-t of this recommendation are attached. The
commander exercising SPCM jurisdlction or' a higher author1 t,y will decide
whether you will discharged or retained in the Air Force.
I f y o u ai\e
discharged, you will he ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
3. This actiQn could result in your separation w i t h an Under Other Than
Honorable conditions discharge. I am recommending that you receive a General
discharge. The commander exercising SPCM jurisdiction or a higher authorit,y
will make the final decision in this matter. If you are discharged, you will
be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.
4. You have the right to:
a. Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
c. He represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.
d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lieu o f ,
the board hearing.
e. Waive the above rights. you must consult legal counsel before making
a decision to waive any of you rights.
you must report to
5. You have been scheduled for a medical examination.
Bldg 114, located at Medina Annex, 0700, on 2'7
?a .
Military legal counsel has been obtained to assist you.
An appointment
6 .
has been scheduled for you to consult the Area Defense Counsel, Bldg 6241, on
2? 7 4 8 L' 38 at / d : O G ti8S Instead of the appointed counsel, you may have
AIR FORCE-A GREAT WAY OF LIFE
.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0038
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD20024038 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Attachment: Examiner’s Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) FD2002-0038 1. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00004
I recommend the respondent be separated from the Air Force with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Discharge the respondent for Misconduct - Pattern of Misconduct (Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline) (AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.50.2), with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge, with or without probation and rehabilitation; \ c. Refer this case to 88 ABW/CC with a recommendation that the respondent be discharged with an honorable discharge. For this...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD01-00282A
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD01-00282-A GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and for a change in the Reason and Authority for the discharge and the RE Code. In her submission to the DRB, the applicant states her belief that she was not given sufficient opportunity to overcome her “financial situation” The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate given the nature of the...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00065
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00065 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Background Information: The respondent has more than six years military service, therefore he is entitled to an administrative discharge board hearing. Based on the respondent’s record, a General discharge is appropriate when characterizing the respondent’s overall service record and drug abuse.
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00032
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW B o r n HEARTNf2 p w r n n n TYPE GEN COWSEL YES No PERSONAL APPEARANCE X NAME O F COUNSEL AND O R ORGANIZATION RECORD REVIEW I ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING WDEX NUMBER A67.90 ISSUES A92.35 A02.17 A92.21 A92.19 A94.05 A02.13 , &BIBITS v*+ 1 I ORDER APPOMTMG THE BOARD S U B M ~ ~ ~ ~ I O IQE ~gw:~ I I APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE I TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I ^ HEARING...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0128
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD fa NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN lini. CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE | pp 002-0128 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge honorable. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0039
(Change Discharge to Honorable & Change the RE Code) Issue 1: I would like you to review the case of my discharge from the Air Force on November 8th 1 9 8 9 . Force for a pattern of misconduct, conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline, The authority for this action is AFB 39-10, paragraph 5-47b- If my recommendation is approved, your service I am recommending will be characterized as honorable or general- that your service be characterized as general. 2 - My reasons for this action...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00085
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-01-00085 I GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. For writing these bad checks, the respondent received nonjudicial punishment under Letter of Reprimand for financial irresponsibility, and restriction to Hill AFB for 30 days. We recommend that you order the respondent's separation from the A i r Force with a general discharge without P & R under AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-47d, for the...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0300
|] AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN alii AIC = | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBERS SITTING ISSUES INDEX NUMBER feu AR A02.17, A94,05, A94.01 A67,30 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 «+| APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 (| LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 03-01-03 FD2002-0300...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00031
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. The DRB recognized the applicant was 19 years of age when the discharge took place. d. On 10 Mar 86, you received an Article 15 for fail to go.