Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02626
Original file (BC-2012-02626.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02626 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The cardio component of her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 10 May 
2012 be updated to reflect “exempt”. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Due to the Albuterol inhaler she was using, her heart rate was 
elevated during the test which was out of the range to achieve a 
passing score. 

 

She has been utilizing an Albuterol inhaler since 2010. She must 
take it before and after physical activity. The physical fitness 
assessment on 10 May 2012 involved the 1.0 mile walk test instead 
of the 1.5 mile run that she normally participates in. While the 
running of 1.5 miles does not monitor heart rate, the 1.0 mile 
walk test does. Her doctor has determined that she should not 
have taken the aerobic [cardio] component. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant. 

 

The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: 

 

 DATE SCORE 

 

 23 March 2010 GOOD 

 13 October 2010 EXCELLENT 

 20 April 2011 EXCELLENT 

 

 

 

 

 

 11 October 2011 SATISFACTORY 


* 10 May 2012 UNSATISFACTORY 

 

*Contested FA score. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval since per AFI 36-2905, Attachment 
13, Sympathomimetic Bronchodilators such as Albuterol and 
Salmeterol may raise pulse when administered during the walk 
aerobic component of the FA. In view of this, they recommend the 
cardio portion component of the contested FA be updated to 
reflect “exempt” in AFFMS. The overall composite score will 
change to reflect 100 (Excellent). 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 6 August 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days 
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting 
relief. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant 
provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should have 
been “exempt” from performing the cardio portion of the FA test. 
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that only the cardio 
component of her FA test be corrected. Therefore, we recommend 
that the records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 


 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio 
component of the Fitness Assessment dated 10 May 2012 be amended 
to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force Fitness Management System. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02626 in Executive Session on 4 April 2013, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 June 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 July 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 August 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2013-00808

    Original file (bc-2013-00808.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00808 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 25 Oct 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application is described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03483

    Original file (BC 2012 03483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03483 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 13 Jul 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). “Body composition (height, weight, and AC) must be the first component assessed in the FA.” While the weight is not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04244

    Original file (BC-2012-04244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to remove the contested FAs; however, they recommend updating the AFFMS to reflect “Exempt” for the cardio component. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04647

    Original file (BC-2012-04647.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval. In view of the medical documentation submitted in support of this appeal indicating the prescribed inhaler contributed to his failure during the cardio component of the contested FA, the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04970

    Original file (BC-2011-04970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of his 7 Jul 11 FA be updated to reflect he was exempt in the AFFMS noting the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, indicates the applicant had a preexisting condition which precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score; and the AF Form 422,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364

    Original file (BC-2012-02364.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00377

    Original file (BC-2013-00377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the applicant's DD Form 149, he also indicated he had ankle pain when completing the sit-up component of the 31 August 2012 FA. Unfortunately, neither profile exempts him from the sit-up component. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04682

    Original file (BC 2013 04682.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 5 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 30 Oct 13 82.75 Exempt Satisfactory 28 Aug 13 32.60 32/0.00(1-mile walk) Unsatisfactory *13 Aug 13 71.75 Exempt Unsatisfactory 13 Feb 13 87.00 Exempt Satisfactory 7 Aug 12 80.20 15:52/44.10 Satisfactory * Contested FA A similar request was denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) on 14 Feb 14 on the basis of “no letter from the commander to invalidate the Fitness Assessment. Also, no AF Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01302

    Original file (BC 2013 01302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01302 XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 09 Jan 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). On 09 Jan 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 70.88,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00248

    Original file (BC-2013-00248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute each). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force,...