DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the
AFBCMR BC-2012-02390
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend the former member’s records be corrected to show that:
APPLICANT, be corrected to show that she was not discharged from the Air Force on 1 March
2011, but on that date she was continued on active duty until 16 March 2011, on which date she
was discharged from active duty.
Attachment:
ARPC/DPA dtd 11 July 2012
Members of the Board, and considered this application on 26 March 2013.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02809
AFBCMR BC-2011-02809 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff or his designee....
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04411
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04411 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Title 10 Military Personnel Appropriation (MPA) active duty orders for the period of 1 October 2010, through 30 September 2011 be amended to show the she was continued on active duty Medical Continuation (MEDCON) orders until 31 December 2012. In...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02008
AFBCMR BC-2011-02008 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04483
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04483 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a medical discharge. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the applicants discharge to include her narrative reason for separation was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00019
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00019 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation, Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service, be removed from her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. Based upon the applicant’s failure to disclose her prior service medical condition,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02847
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02847 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Addressing the applicants character of service, as depicted on both her DD Form 214 and NGB Form 22, the Medical Consultant notes this has been entered as entry level. The Medical Consultant opines the appropriate designation would be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04161
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and SAF/MRB Legal Advisor attached at Exhibits B and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. While we note the comments of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor indicating an applicant must prove by sufficient evidence that he or she is the victim of a serious injustice not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04161
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility and SAF/MRB Legal Advisor attached at Exhibits B and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. While we note the comments of the SAF/MRB Legal Advisor indicating an applicant must prove by sufficient evidence that he or she is the victim of a serious injustice not...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04426
She separated from the Regular Air Force effective 27 June 2011 and was appointed an officer in the USAFR effective 19 July 2011 (date of SecDef approval). The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01084
In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from the flight surgeon, a Report of Individual Fitness, AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report. The applicant’s overall composite score will reflect 80.25 (Satisfactory) The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should...