Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01694
Original file (BC-2013-01694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01694
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO

	 

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect award of 
the Presidential Unit Citation with Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (PUC 
w/BOLC) and any other awards that he may be entitled to.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While he was trying to join the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), 
he was told that his DD Form 214 did not reflect any foreign 
service time.  He believes this to be in error or unjust because 
from April 1973 through April 1974 he served at U-Tapao Thailand 
under the 307th Munitions Maintenance Squadron loading bombs onto 
B52s.  

In support of his request, the applicant provides personal 
statements, a copy of a printout from the internet, a copy of 
his NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service in 
the Air National Guard of Illinois, and a copy of his DD Form 
214.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects he has 1 year of foreign 
service and a total of 2 years and 10 days of total service for 
pay.  The applicant was discharged from the National Guard 
Bureau (NGB) on 11 Mar 79 in the grade of sergeant.  

The applicant’s DD Form 214 was previously corrected to reflect 
the VSM (DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Report of 
Separation from Active Duty), see Exhibit B.

AFPC/DPSOR was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the 
Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFCM) and the Air Force 
Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and his record will be  
administratively corrected.

The PUC criteria:  Executive Order 9075 on 26 Feb 42, created 
this award and was superseded by Executive Order 9396 on 2 Dec 
43, which authorized the Distinguished Unit Citation, and this 
executive order was superseded by Executive Order 10694, on 
10 Jan 57 which redesignated the Distinguished Unit Citation as 
the Presidential Unit Citation.  It is conferred on units of the 
armed forces of the United States and of cobelligerent nations, 
for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy on or 
after 7 Dec 41.  The unit must display such gallantry, 
determination, and esprit de corps in accomplishing its mission 
as to set it apart from and above other units participating in 
the same campaign.  The degree of heroism required is the same 
as that which would warrant award of the Distinguished Service 
Cross to an individual.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denying award of the PUC stating they were 
unable to verify that the applicant’s unit of assignment or 
attachment at that time was awarded the PUC; therefore, 
rendering him ineligible for the award.

The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 10 Jul 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, this office has received no response.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took note 
of the applicant’s complete submission; however, we do not find 
he has provided sufficient documentary evidence to substantiate 
his claim that his unit was awarded the PUC; therefore, we agree 
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for 
our conclusion that relief beyond that already granted 
administratively is not warranted.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-01694 in Executive Session on 12 Dec 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Apr 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 21 Jun 13.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jul 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair








FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974


FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
4


3




This document contains information which must be protected IAW AFI 33-332 and DoD Regulation 
5400.11; Privacy Act of 1974 as Amended Applies, and it is For Official Use Only (FOUO).

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04566

    Original file (BC 2013 04566 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for entitlement to the VSM, RVNGC w/P, Air Force Overseas Ribbon - Long Tour, AFOUA w/V and the PUC. Upon the final Board decision, administrative correction of the applicant's official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01200

    Original file (BC-2013-01200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the BSM and AM indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There was no official documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01274

    Original file (BC 2014 01274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant contends that because he was assigned to the 93rd Bomb Group, and said unit was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), his records should be corrected to reflect...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04673

    Original file (BC-2012-04673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The PUC is conferred on units of the armed forces of the United States and of cobelligerent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00163

    Original file (BC-2010-00163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect the appropriate awards and foreign service time. Only members of the armed forces of the United States who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or Vietnam Service Medal during the period of service required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02530

    Original file (BC-2012-02530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02530 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His late uncle’s records be corrected show that he was posthumously awarded two Bronze Star Medals (BSMs), and was entitled to the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), three Presidential Unit Citations (PUCs), formerly known as Distinguished Unit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00354

    Original file (BC 2014 00354.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, DPSID noted the following awards and decorations will be corrected administratively after final Board action: • PH • PWM • PUC, w/2BOLCs • Philippine Republic Presidential Unit Citation (PHRPUC) • ACPM, with one Bronze Service Star (APCM w/lBSS) • WWIIVM • ADSM, w/Overseas Clasp • PDM, with one Bronze Service Star (PDM w/1 BSS) • Good Conduct Medal (GCM) Based on information from the Air Force Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR), the applicant initially entered the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00463

    Original file (BC 2014 00463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00463 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 31 Aug 83 retirement, in Item 13, Decoration, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, be corrected to add the following awards and decorations: 1. DPSID determined that the below Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04527

    Original file (BC-2011-04527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V) – administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05290

    Original file (BC 2013 05290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 21 Aug 75 discharge, be corrected to add the awards below in Item 26, Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citation, and Campaign Ribbons...