Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04527
Original file (BC-2011-04527.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04527 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. The Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) be added to his DD Form 
214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or 
Discharge. 

 

2. He be entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with 
Valor (AFOUA w/V) – administratively corrected. 

 

3. The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) 
be added to his DD Form 214. 

 

4. He be entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze 
Stars (VSM w/4 BSS) – administratively corrected to reflect VSM 
w/1 Silver Service Star. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

1. The awards and decorations should address the PUC (5 Mar 68 – 
31 Jan 69); AFOUA w/V DAFSO GB-787-69; the BSS’s for the 
following campaigns – Air Offensive Phase 2 67-68, Vietnam Air 
Ground 68, Air Offensive Phases 3 and 4 during 68-69, and the 
RVNGC w/P during 16 Dec 66 – 28 Jan 73. 

 

2. He received an e-mail in September 2011 from a member of the 
Vietnam Security Police Association letting him know that he may 
be eligible for the awards mentioned in the e-mail. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer 
or Discharge, a copy of his DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 
214), and excerpts from his personnel records. 

 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 


 

The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 17 Nov 65 
and was honorably discharged on 19 Mar 69 after serving 3 years, 
4 months, and 3 days on active duty. 

 

The PUC criteria: Executive Order 9075 on 26 Feb 42, created 
this award and was superseded by Executive Order 9396 on 2 Dec 
43, which authorized the Distinguished Unit Citation, and this 
executive order was superseded by Executive Order 10694, on 
10 Jan 57 which redesignated the Distinguished Unit Citation as 
the Presidential Unit Citation. It is conferred on units of the 
armed forces of the United States and of cobelligerent nations, 
for extraordinary heroism in action against an armed enemy on or 
after 7 Dec 41. The unit must display such gallantry, 
determination, and esprit de corps in accomplishing its mission 
as to set it apart from and above other units participating in 
the same campaign. The degree of heroism required is the same as 
that which would warrant award of the Distinguished Service Cross 
to an individual. 

 

The RVNGC criteria: The ribbon is awarded by the Republic of 
Vietnam to certain units of the U.S. Armed Forces for valorous 
combat achievement during the Vietnam War, 1 March 1961 to 
28 March 1973. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. The applicant’s records revealed 
he earned the AFOUA w/V and the VSM w/1 SSS; however, DPSIDR was 
unable to verify that his unit received either the PUC or the 
RVNCG w/P during his tour of duty. 

 

The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 7 Mar 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 


 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. In this 
respect, we note the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
has agreed to administratively correct the applicant’s record to 
reflect award of the VSM with one Bronze Service Star and the 
AFOUA w/V. We concur with the Air Force’s recommended actions. 
However, with regard to the PUC we do not find he has provided 
any documentary evidence to substantiate his claim his unit was 
awarded the PUC; therefore, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that 
relief beyond that already granted administratively is not 
warranted. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04527 in Executive Session on 8 May 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Sep 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 17 Feb 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Mar 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03427

    Original file (BC-2011-03427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) – administratively corrected. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00163

    Original file (BC-2010-00163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect the appropriate awards and foreign service time. Only members of the armed forces of the United States who meet the criteria established for the AFEM (Vietnam) or Vietnam Service Medal during the period of service required are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01107

    Original file (BC-2010-01107.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) – administratively corrected. He be awarded the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 30 Jun 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03339

    Original file (BC 2007 03339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 Dec 07, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00813

    Original file (BC-2011-00813.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPSIDR has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the PUC, AFOUA w/V, the RVNGC w/P, and the Vietnam Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/3BSS). His DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to include these awards. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00813 in Executive Session on 2 Aug 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04002

    Original file (BC-2011-04002.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Entitlement verified – will be administratively corrected) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The applicant asserts that other members of his units received the AFOUA w/V &1OLC and the RVNGC w/P and two Bronze Service Stars, while serving in Vietnam. A letter from the Air Force Historical Research Agency (AFHRA) to a member of his unit clearly states the AFOUA w/2 V’s is authorized because “all” detachments to this unit share...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01385

    Original file (BC 2013 01385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 Jul 06, the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) notified the applicant that his request for the PUC, the RVCM, and the Air Force Overseas Ribbon-Short Tour (AFOSR-S) were denied. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03697

    Original file (BC-2010-03697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was informed by other military personnel that he is entitled to the requested awards based on his service in Phan Tang Air Base (AB), Republic of Vietnam. DPSIDR states that after a thorough review of the applicant’s military service records and Air Force Pamphlet 900- 2, Unit Decorations, Awards and Campaign Participation Credits, they were unable to verify his entitlement for award of the PUC. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05444

    Original file (BC 2013 05444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam Service Medal with a Silver Service Star (VSM w/SSS) Army Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon with one Bronze Service Star (SAEMR w/1BSS) Air Force Training Ribbon (AFTR) ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is authorized the requested awards and it is unclear as to why the awards from his original DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02189

    Original file (BC-2010-02189.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. Nonetheless, after careful review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we are convinced of his entitlement to the requested award.