RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01019
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes Involuntarily
separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation
without characterization of service be changed to allow him to
enlist into the Air National Guard (ANG).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was discharged from technical training and was not given a
chance to reclass into a different career field.
He did not receive any non-judicial punishment during his time
in service.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 26 Jul 11, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force
for a period of six years.
On 21 Feb 12, the applicant was notified by his squadron
commander that she was recommending his discharge from the Air
Force for academic failure (not making satisfactory progress in
a required training program). Specifically, he failed to
progress in the Basic Medical Technician training program.
During training, he failed three unit exams within the Emergency
Medical Technician (EMT) block of training and was disenrolled
from technical training school on 14 Feb 12. Prior to
disenrollment, he received 1.5 hours of one-on-one and special
individual assistance and counseling on three occasions.
The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification of
discharge and after consulting with legal counsel, submitted a
statement in his own behalf.
The base legal office found the case legally sufficient to
support the separation, and on 1 Mar 12, the discharge authority
approved the discharge.
On 7 Mar 12, the applicant was honorably discharged, by reason
of Unsatisfactory Performance, and was issued an RE code of 2C.
He served on active duty for a period of 7 months and 12 days.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states that the applicants
RE code (2C) is correct based on his involuntary discharge with
an honorable character of service. The applicant provides no
evidence of an error or injustice with regard to his RE code.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 6 Apr 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).
As of this date, this office has received no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number
BC-2013-01019 in Executive Session on 19 Nov 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Feb 13, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 27 Mar 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Apr 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02097
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02097 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service and separation program designator (SPD) codes be changed so that she can serve again in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01392
Airmen are given entry-level separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. Airmen separated under this provision are not updated to a RE code of 2C. In addition, DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 3A, unless otherwise directed by the Board. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04397
On 18 Apr 11, the legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended discharge with an honorable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. Based on the evidence of record, it appears the applicants honorable discharge for unsatisfactory performance was consistent with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03745
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her RE code is unjust because she was not offered the opportunity to reclassify into another career field after failing a test in technical training. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00287
The RE code of 2C is the correct RE code based upon the applicants involuntary discharge with honorable [sic] character of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation for an Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized character of service, the applicants RE code of 2C was required in accordance with AF Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00287
The RE code of 2C is the correct RE code based upon the applicants involuntary discharge with honorable [sic] character of service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation for an Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized character of service, the applicants RE code of 2C was required in accordance with AF Instruction 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01107
On 4 Feb 09, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for entry level performance and conduct in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen . Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04730
________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04730 in Executive Session on 15 May 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Nov 11, w/atch. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Jan 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02933
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02797
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02797 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) and separation program designator (SPD) codes be revised to allow him the opportunity for reenlistment into the Air Force or other military service. The applicant received an involuntary discharge with a narrative reason for...