Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00600
Original file (BC-2013-00600.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00600

		COUNSEL:  NO

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge 
be upgraded to honorable or general (under honorable 
conditions).

2.  His narrative reason for separation be changed to reflect 
something other than “Misconduct.”

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His symptoms of Gulf War Syndrome as a result of his support of 
Operation Desert Shield/Storm led to his diagnosis of Post-
Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and contributed to his 
misconduct.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted 
in the Regular Air Force on 11 Dec 90.

On 27 Mar 97, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was 
recommending his discharge from the Air Force for A Pattern of 
Misconduct, Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline.  
The reasons for the action included the applicant making a false 
official statement, driving a car while impaired, failing to pay 
just debts, and misuse of his government credit card, for which 
he received two separate nonjudicial punishment (NJP) actions 
under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) 
and a Letter of Reprimand (LOR)/Unfavorable Information File 
(UIF), respectively.  

On 7 Apr 97, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action 
and invoked his right to a hearing before an administrative 
discharge board.  
On 29 Apr 97, the applicant’s commander served an addendum to 
the notification on the applicant to include the additional 
misconduct of sleeping on duty, for which he received NJP action 
under Article 15 of the UCMJ.  He also notified the applicant 
that he was recommending he receive an UOTHC discharge instead 
of a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. 

On 29 Apr 97, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the Addendum 
to Notification Memorandum, waived his right to a hearing before 
an administrative discharge board, and submitted statements on 
his own behalf. 

On 2 May 97, the legal office recommended approving the 
applicant’s unconditional waiver and discharging the applicant 
with an UOTCH discharge.

On 7 May 97, the discharge authority accepted the applicant’s 
unconditional waiver and directed he be discharged and furnished 
an UOTHC discharge.

On 8 May 97, the applicant was furnished an UOTHC discharge and 
was credited with 6 years, 4 months, and 28 days of total active 
service.

On 3 Dec 13, a request for post-service information was 
forwarded to the applicant for comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  In response, the applicant reiterates that his PTSD 
contributed to his misconduct.  He highlights some of the 
contributions he provided to the Air Force during his career 
such as, helping to create a paperless finance system and 
helping other bases to implement the system, playing sports for 
the squadron, and winning various awards.  He also mentions some 
of the things he has done since leaving the Air Force such as, 
working for insurance company and helping them implement a 
paperless system, becoming a fireman, and volunteering in the 
community.  He goes on to mention that his son and father died 
but he remained sober even through those tough times.  Lastly, 
he would appreciate consideration and acknowledgement of his 
good deeds when evaluating his case.  In support of his 
response, the applicant provides an expanded statement and 
copies of awards he won with his Fire Department (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or 
injustice that occurred in the discharge process.  Based on the 
available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s Under 
Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge for misconduct 
was consistent with the substantive requirements of the 
discharge regulation and within the discharge authority’s 
discretion.  He has provided no evidence which would lead us to 
believe otherwise.  In the interest of justice, we considered 
upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not 
find the evidence presented is sufficient to conclude that his 
post-service accomplishments overcome the misconduct for which 
he was discharged.  In view of the foregoing, and in the absence 
of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to 
upgrade the applicant’s UOTHC discharge.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00600 in Executive Session on 14 Jan 14, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

		                 , Panel Chair
		                 , Member
		                 , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00600 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 13, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 3 Dec 13, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair

3

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04642

    Original file (BC 2013 04642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04642 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to conclude that his contributions to his community since leaving the service are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05845

    Original file (BC 2012 05845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 Dec 83, the applicant was discharged with service characterized as UOTHC in the grade of airman basic. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: By letter dated 5 May 13, the applicant states he has two reasons for seeking an upgrade to his discharge. While the applicant contends his discharge was unjust because of two TBI injuries, and states that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2000-00074

    Original file (BC-2000-00074.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    He submitted a request for retirement in lieu of discharge and requested a hearing before an administrative discharge board. He was not discharged from the Air Force on 21 August 2000, but rather on that date he was continued on active duty. Exhibit H. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 29 Oct 03 ROSCOE HINTON, JR. Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MR SUBJECT: AFBCMR Case on I have carefully reviewed all of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00172

    Original file (BC-2008-00172.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00172 INDEX CODE: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, documentation associated with the Court of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02855

    Original file (BC 2013 02855.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board concluded the evidence presented was sufficiently credible enough to substantiate upgrading the discharge to a general discharge; however, his misconduct and substandard performance did not warrant an Honorable discharge. While the Air Force Discharge Review Board was compelled to upgrade the applicant’s under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge to general (under honorable conditions) discharge, we find no basis to recommend a further upgrade of the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03121

    Original file (BC-2008-03121.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 Jun 84, the applicant’s commander notified him he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct. c. On 19 Apr 84, he received an Article 15 for striking another airman on 7 Apr 84 and failure to go on 11 Apr 84. d. On 14 Jun 84, he received an Article 15 for wrongfully possessing marijuana. The command and base legal office reviewed the case and recommended accepting the unconditional waiver and discharge with an UOTHC discharge without probation and rehabilitation.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03545

    Original file (BC 2013 03545.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03545 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Based on his service time and commitment to the Air Force he respectively request consideration of his application to upgrade his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00529

    Original file (BC-2010-00529.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER:BC-2010-00529 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ____________________________________________________________ _____ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general. On 17 Mar 89, he acknowledged receipt of the notification and after consulting with legal counsel, waived his rights associated with an administrative discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03455

    Original file (BC 2013 03455.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Apr 12, the applicant received notification of demotion action under AFI 36-2502, Failure to Keep Fit, paragraph 6.3.5, due to four fitness assessment failures within a 24-month period. However, recommend removing FA dated 18 Jun 10, based on the fact that this was before the implementation of AFI 36-2905 (AFGM2), dated 20 Dec 10, giving Unit Commanders the authority to invalidate FAs. Although the applicant provided a memorandum from his medical provider stating that he had a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01747

    Original file (BC-2012-01747.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS did his job AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01747 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 26 Mar 96, the 39 WG/CC reviewed the case file and recommended the 16th Air Force commander (16 AF/CC) approve the applicant’s unconditional waiver...