Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00371
Original file (BC-2013-00371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-00371
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be amended to include Vietnam service.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He is not able to apply for a presumptive Agent Orange 
evaluation for ischemia heart disease.  The Department of 
Veterans Affairs investigation indicated that he did not have 
“in country” service in Vietnam.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, he provides copies of 
documents extracted from his military personnel records.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 30 September 1983, the applicant was released from active 
duty and on 1 October 1983, he retired in the grade of master 
sergeant under the provisions of AFR 35-7 (Voluntary-Retirement 
for years of service established by law).  He served 27 years, 1 
month and 8 days on active duty and credited with 15 years, 10 
months and 27 days of foreign service.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial.  DPAPP states they were able to 
verify and confirm boots on the ground in Thailand, but not 
Vietnam.  A review of his master personnel records and 
documentation submitted failed to provide any documents that 
substantiate foreign service time in Vietnam.



The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant states that the orders he provided reflect that he 
was relieved from assignment with the 2054th Communications 
Squadron and assigned to the 1964th Communications Group, APO 
143, Saigon, Vietnam.

He departed CONUS and arrived in Tan Son Nhut, Saigon on 
13 December 1964.  He processed into the 1964th Communications 
Group and was assigned as an Air Traffic Control Radar 
Repairman.  Upon arrival at Tan Son Nhut he received payment for 
his travel and permanent change of station (PCS) move.

On 22 December 1964, he departed Tan Son Nhut for Thailand after 
serving approximately nine days in Vietnam.  He further states 
award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit award is proof that he 
was assigned to and served in Vietnam.

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit F.

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  The 
applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing 
the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to substantiate 
time served in Vietnam.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence 
to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________
_






THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________
_

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-00371 in Executive Session on 15 October 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 January 2013, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Available Master Personnel Records.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 13 February 2013.
  Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 February 2013.
  Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 4 March 2013, w/atchs







2


3




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02214

    Original file (BC-2010-02214.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Information regarding his service with the 1964th Communications Group in the Republic of Vietnam has been declassified since the time of his discharge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with respect to the applicant’s request for credit for service in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00178

    Original file (BC-2012-00178.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, a copy of a document extracted from his military personnel records and a notarized letter from a former coworker attesting to his service in the Republic of Vietnam. No documentation was provided to verify the applicant served in Vietnam, or any area for which the VSM is authorized for the specified period of time. We believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam based on the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04051

    Original file (BC-2011-04051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not reflect service in Vietnam or Thailand. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility confirms the applicant was TDY to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03553

    Original file (BC 2013 03553 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSID states that the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments was unable to verify the applicant's Foreign Service time in Vietnam. Moreover, the applicant’s TDY orders and the Foreign and/or Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 match up perfectly. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02676

    Original file (BC-2011-02676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, and eight copies of his AF Forms 626, Temporary Duty Order – Military, with dates ranging from April 1966 through June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to show Vietnam service, and states, in part, they were able to verify and confirm the applicant’s foreign service at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03160

    Original file (BC 2013 03160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03160 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to show the following: 1. He served in Vietnam. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03274

    Original file (BC-2012-03274.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03274 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00778

    Original file (BC-2011-00778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP is unable to confirm the applicant spent any time in Vietnam based on his Master Personnel Records and requested additional information from the applicant. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02562

    Original file (BC 2013 02562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02562 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam and award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03399

    Original file (BC 2014 03399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely request because he failed to notice it was missing from his DD Form 214 until his Veteran Service Officer brought it to his attention. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to have...