Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02277
Original file (BC-2012-02277.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 

 
 
DOCKET NUMBER:  
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF:   
   
   
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
Had he served another year he would have been able to transfer 
the  education  benefits  to  his  children  and  would  have  done  so, 
but he was not informed.  He was active duty from 1984 to 1998. 
 
The applicant provides no documentation in support of his appeal. 
 
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from 
the  applicant’s  military  records,  are  contained  in  the  letter 
prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
DPTT  recommends  denial.    DPTT  states  the  mechanism  for 
transferring Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits was available on 29 June 
2009 but, by law, the applicant was required to be active duty or 
selected  reserve  on  1  August  2009  as  well  as  on  the  date  the 
request  to  transfer  was  initiated.    Each  year  Congress 
reconsiders  allowing  the  transfer  opportunity  for  members  who 
retired  before  the  inception  of  the  program.    To  date  Congress 
has  declined  to  make  that  change.    Based  on  the  facts  the 
applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents.  
He retains the right to use the benefits himself. 
 
 
 
 
The DPTT complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. 
 
 
 

_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On 16 July 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).    As  of  this  date,  no  response  has  been  received  by  this 
office.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice.    The 
applicant’s  contentions  are  duly  noted;  however,  we  agree  with 
the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility  and  adopt  its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our 
conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error 
or  injustice.    Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the 
contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief 
sought. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  an  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-02277  in  Executive  Session  on  8  January  2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
The  following  documentary  evidence  pertaining  to  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-02277 was considered: 
 

 

2 
 

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 May 2012. 
  Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 2 July 2012. 
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 July 2012. 
 
 
 
 

 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03120

    Original file (BC 2013 03120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The mechanism for transferring Post- 9/11 GI Bill benefits has been available since 29 June 2009 but, by law, the member is required to be active duty or selected reserve on the date the request to transfer is initiated. Based on the facts provided, the applicant is not eligible to transfer his benefits to his dependents as defined in Public Law No. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02018

    Original file (BC-2012-02018.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the Board determines otherwise, he is able to provide whatever evidence is deemed necessary. The applicant did not provide any documents in support of his request. In this respect, the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) has indicated that through no fault of the applicant it appears he may not have been afforded the opportunity to transfer his benefits to his dependents.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00764

    Original file (BC 2014 00764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00764 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 19 Dec 12. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02225

    Original file (BC 2013 02225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02225 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to her dependents. DPTT states the mechanism for transferring benefits was available on 29 June 2009 but, by law, the applicant was required to be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02411

    Original file (BC-2012-02411.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The services failed to inform its members who were approaching retirement of the requirement to be on active duty on the 1 Aug 09 effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to be eligible to transfer benefits. ________________________________________________________________ 2 THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00869

    Original file (BC 2014 00869.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00869 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependent. DPTT states the applicant transferred all 36 months of his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his daughter prior to his retirement on 28 August 2010. The DPTT complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02088

    Original file (BC-2012-02088.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01546

    Original file (BC-2012-01546.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Public Law states in part, that “an individual may transfer such entitlement only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.” Further, the Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) implemented a communication plan that employed ARPC and unit education and training offices to convey the program information. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02209

    Original file (BC 2014 02209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely application because his daughter was still in middle school at the time he retired. Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any Service member on or after 1 August 2009, who is entitled to the Post-9/11 GI Bill at the time of the approval of his or her request to transfer that entitlement, may transfer that entitlement provided he or she meets one of these conditions: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04352

    Original file (BC-2011-04352.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    110-252, for the first time in history, service members were able to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to their dependents. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 Sep 10, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits. ...