Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01152
Original file (BC-2012-01152.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01152 
COUNSEL:  NONE 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
  (DECEASED)  
 
  (APPLICANT) 
       
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
Her late husband’s DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States 
Report  of  Transfer  or  Discharge,  be  amended  to  reflect  that  he 
served in Thailand, Vietnam, and Korea. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
Her  late  husband  served  several  tours  in  Southeast  Asia  (SEA), 
flying  missions  out  of  Thailand  in  support  of  operations  in 
Vietnam.  He received the Vietnam Service Medal with seven Bronze 
Service  Stars  (VSM  w/7BSS),  the  Republic  of  Vietnam  Campaign 
Medal  (RVCM),  and  the  Republic  of  Vietnam  Gallantry  Cross  with 
Palm (RVNGC w/P).  The errors on her husband’s DD Form 214 are 
preventing  her  from  receiving  benefits  from  the  Department  of 
Veterans  Affairs  (DVA)  related  to  her  husband’s  passing  as  a 
result of his herbicide exposure. 
 
In  support  of  her  request,  the  applicant  provides  a  copy  of  the 
service member’s death certificate and DD Form 214. 
 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The deceased former member served in the regular Air Force during 
the  matter  under  review.    On  31  May  73,  the  deceased  former 
member  was  relieved  from  active  duty  and  retired,  effective 
1 Jun 73,  and  credited  with  22  years,  5  months,  and  3  days  of 
active service, which included 4 years, 5 months, and 23 days of 
foreign service.   
 
On  22  Jun  12,  AFPC/DPSOY  notified  the  applicant  that  in 
accordance  with  Air  Force  Directives  and  Department  of  Defense 
(DOD) guidance, specific TDY duty locations are not reflected on 
the DD Form 214; rather, only permanent assignments to Vietnam, 
Thailand, or Korea qualify for update to the DD Form 214.   
 
_________________________________________________________________ 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPAPP notes although they cannot confirm the exact locations 
of the service member’s TDY assignments to Southeast Asia, they 
can confirm he was in the Southeast Asia area of responsibility 
on  numerous  occasions.    Because  the  service  member  was  flying 
combat missions, it can be assumed he flew missions in and around 
Vietnam. 
 
The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
The  applicant  provided  a  photograph  of  the  service  member 
receiving  congratulations  from  his  Deputy  Commander  for 
completing 100 Young Tiger refueling missions in Southeast Asia. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  response,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit E. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice with respect 
to  the  applicant’s  request  to  have  the  deceased  former  service 
member’s  DD  Form  214  corrected  to  reflect  he  served  in  Vietnam, 
Thailand,  and  Korea.    We  took  note  of  the  applicant's  complete 
submission,  to  include  her  rebuttal  response,  in  judging  the 
merits  of  the  case;  however,  while  it  is  clear  from  the 
documentation  provided  the  deceased  former  service  member  served 
on a variety of temporary duty (TDY) assignments in the Southeast 
Asia Theater of Operations, we do not find the evidence presented 
sufficient to conclude his DD Form 214 should be corrected as she 
requests.    In  this  respect  we  note  that  in  accordance  with  the 
governing  Department  of  Defense  instructions,  only  permanent 
assignments in the Theater of Operations qualified for update to 
the  DD Form  214.    Therefore,  in  view  of  the  above  and  in  the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend 
granting  the  relief  sought  in  this  application.    Notwithstanding 
the  above,  sufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  an  error  or  injustice  warranting 
partial relief.  After a thorough review of the evidence presented 
and  the  deceased  service  member’s  military  personnel  records,  we 
believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served 
in Vietnam.  In this respect, we note the comments of AFPC/DPAPP 
indicating  that  his  performance  reports  closing  15  Oct  69  and 

2 

15 Oct 71 reflect he served several TDY assignments in Southeast 
Asia  and  was  awarded  the  AFOUA  for  outstanding  achievement  in 
Southeast  Asia.    Therefore,  in  view  of  the  above,  and  in 
recognition  of  his  service  to  the  Nation,  we  recommend  the 
deceased  former  member’s  records  be  corrected  to  the  extent 
indicated below. 
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 
 
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to the FORMER SERVICE MEMBER be corrected to show that 
he had boots on the ground in the Republic of Vietnam.  
 
_________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number BC-2012-01152 in Executive Session on 9 Jan 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 
 
All  members  voted  to  correct  the  records  as  recommended.    The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Mar 12, w/atchs. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 12 Jun 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Aug 12. 
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 31 Aug 12, w/atch. 
 
 
 
 
                                
                               Panel Chair 

  Panel Chair 
  Member 
  Member 

3 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05154

    Original file (BC 2013 05154.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05154 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her spouse’s records be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Vietnam and award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00026

    Original file (BC-2011-00026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant served at Kadena Air Base (AB), Japan, from 20 Sep 67 to 22 Mar 68, for a total of six months and four days. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The documentation provided to date clearly shows flight time during both TDYs, in 67-68 and 68-69. Someone must know KC-135 crew chiefs flew with their aircraft on most missions at that time.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02545

    Original file (BC-2009-02545.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The former service member enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 22 Feb 73. The information provided by the applicant did not verify her husband served in Thailand or Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted a copy of a letter from someone who served...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00709

    Original file (BC-2011-00709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00709 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The time he spent in Vietnam is not recorded accurately. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05271

    Original file (BC 2013 05271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Vietnam service. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends disapproval of the applicant’s request to correct his records to reflect service in Thailand.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870

    Original file (BC-2012-02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01864

    Original file (BC-2011-01864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP could not verify any time served in Vietnam or Thailand. DPSIDR states that based upon review of the applicant’s military records they were unable to verify that he served on Temporary Duty (TDY) in Vietnam from Apr 72 to Aug 72. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02660

    Original file (BC-2005-02660.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We are not ungrateful or unappreciative of his service to this nation; however, absent the presence of official documentation showing that he served in the Republic of Vietnam, the applicant's request cannot be favorably considered. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02674

    Original file (BC-2011-02674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP cannot verify the applicant was TDY to Vietnam, nor verify that the author of the supporting statement provided with his submission was assigned with him at Clark AFB or in Vietnam. We note the comments of the Air Force...