Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03764
Original file (BC-2012-03764.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03764 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her official records be changed to show that she was awarded the 
Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She qualifies for the SWASM based upon her support to Operation 
DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM while stationed at Sembach Air Base, 
Germany, but the medal was issued after she was discharged from 
service. The qualifying period for award of the SWASM was 
2 Aug 90 through 30 Nov 95, and she served through May 95. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described 
in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice. Individuals authorized for award of the 
SWASM served in support of Operations DESERT STORM, DESERT 
SHIELD, PROVIDE COMFORT, or the Cease Fire Campaign in one or 
more of the following areas from 2 Aug 90 through 30 Nov 95: 
Persian Gulf, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman, Gulf of Aden, that portion 
of the Arabian Sea that lies north of ten degrees north latitude 
and 68 degrees east longitude, as well as the total land areas 
of Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, and the United 
Arab Emirates. Germany is not considered to be a qualifying 
area of eligibility for award of the SWASM. There is no 
documentation verifying the applicant served in the area of 


eligibility to qualify for the SWASM. Therefore, the applicant 
is ineligible for the award. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 27 Aug 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-03764 in Executive Session on 2 Apr 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Aug 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 9 Oct 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Aug 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03602

    Original file (BC-2012-03602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Although the applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects that he served from 2 Aug 90 through 23 Feb 91, in support of Operation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01046

    Original file (BC 2014 01046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01046 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards and decorations: Kuwait Liberation Medal-Saudi Arabia (KLM-SA) Kuwait Liberation Medal-Kuwait (KLM-K) Southwest Asia Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars (SWASM, w/3 BSSs). The SWASM is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who served in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03833

    Original file (BC 2014 03833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There was no official documentation located in the applicant’s military personnel records to show he was deployed to Turkey in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM during the inclusive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00825

    Original file (BC 2013 00825.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In a letter dated 21 March 2012, DPSIDRA advised the applicant that his DD Form 214, dated 15 September 1993, states in Section 18 that he served in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM and that this statement only verifies that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02737

    Original file (BC-2010-02737.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP notes a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and the documentation submitted failed to provide any evidence to substantiate any foreign service in support of Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM. DPSIDR states there was no documentation located in the applicant military personnel records to reflect he served in support of Operation DESERT SHEILD/STORM. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPAPP, dated 1 Oct 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01121

    Original file (BC 2014 01121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should have been awarded the SWASM for his support of Operation VIGILANT WARRIOR and that time should be reflected as foreign service on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends the Board review the documentation provided by the applicant and determine if it is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01125

    Original file (BC 2014 01125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01125 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Foreign Service in Saudi Arabia during Operation DESERT STORM. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00305

    Original file (BC-2010-00305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPSIDR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was stationed at Hahn Air Base (AB), Germany, from Jan 87 thru Jan 91. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, after a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and his military records, we found that there was no evidence provided that supported his contention that he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01185

    Original file (BC-2011-01185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01185 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to reflect he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02451

    Original file (BC-2011-02451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be eligible, a service member must be: 1) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground and/or shore (military) operations; 2) attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations; 3) actually participating as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations in the AOR; or 4) serving on temporary duty for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive...