Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02694
Original file (BC-2012-02694.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02694 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His 12 Dec 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and 
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He has been on a profile for knee pain since 26 Oct 11 and his 
knee condition has progressively worsened. At the time of his 
FA, he was not exempted from the sit-up component of the FA; 
however, during the FA, the force applied to his knees put him 
in too much pain to finish the required sit-ups to pass the FA. 
Shortly after his FA, he went back to the doctor and was put on 
a “no sit-up” profile. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of senior airman (E-4). 

 

On 26 Oct 11, the applicant was issued a medical profile serial 
report which exempted him from repetitive high impact activity 
and repetitive jumping or squatting and expired on 7 Dec 11. 

 

On 23 Nov 11, the applicant was issued a medical profile serial 
report which exempted him from repetitive high impact activity 
with lower extremities; repetitive jumping or squatting; running 
greater than 0 yards; and walking greater than ¼ mile and 
expired on 21 Dec 11. 

On 12 Dec 11, the applicant participated in the contested FA, 
attaining a composite score of 65.75, which constituted an 
unsatisfactory assessment. 

 

On 20 Dec 11, the applicant was issued an addendum to the 
medical profile serial report, dated 23 Nov 11, which exempted 


him from repetitive bending from the knees and the addendum 
expired on 26 Jan 12. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, noting that Air Force Instruction 
36-2905, Fitness Program, paragraph 4.3.2, states that “Member 
is exempt from one or more components of the FA, but will be 
assessed on remaining components.” The applicant provided an AF 
Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification 
Status, dated 28 Nov 11, which exempted him from the 1.5 mile 
run and 1.0 mile submaximal walk assessment. The applicant 
tested on 12 Dec 11 IAW his profile. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 Sep 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The 
applicant contends that his chronic knee pain precluded him from 
performing the requisite sit-ups to attain a passing score 
during the contested FA. While we note the comments by the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility indicating the FA was 
properly administered in accordance with the applicant’s 
profile, we believe substantial evidence indicates that his FA 
test failure was directly attributable to the noted medical 
condition. In this respect, we note the medical documentation 
provided by the applicant indicates he had been issued a profile 
which exempted him from repetitive bending from the knees well 
prior to performing the contested FA. While said profile did 
not exempt him from performing the sit-up component of the FA, 


we note that competent medical authority subsequently amended 
the applicant’s profile to include such an exemption within days 
of the contested FA. Therefore, we find it reasonable to 
conclude his FA failure was directly attributable to his 
previously diagnosed medical condition. Therefore, we recommend 
his records be corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was 
exempt from the sit-up component of his 12 December 2011 Fitness 
Assessment (FA). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02694 in Executive Session on 28 Feb 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Jul 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 7 Sep 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05468

    Original file (BC 2012 05468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical condition which is validated by a medical provider. In this case, after the applicant sustained his injury, there is no indication a medical provider exempted him from any components of the FA or that his commander invalidated the test. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04970

    Original file (BC-2011-04970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of his 7 Jul 11 FA be updated to reflect he was exempt in the AFFMS noting the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, indicates the applicant had a preexisting condition which precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score; and the AF Form 422,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05541

    Original file (BC-2012-05541.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant is not clear on which FA test he would like removed from his records, we believe based on the Air Force office of primary responsibility review of his record and the AF Form 108 provided by the applicant that reflects his FA dated 15 Mar 12 is, in fact, the assessment he is requesting to be removed. The AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, documenting his limitations and duty exemptions is noted; however, we also note the Military...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591

    Original file (BC 2013 01591.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, “There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment.” On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04244

    Original file (BC-2012-04244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to remove the contested FAs; however, they recommend updating the AFFMS to reflect “Exempt” for the cardio component. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550

    Original file (BC 2013 01550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05833

    Original file (BC 2013 05833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After the FA the applicant visited his medical provider and was given a corrected profile. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to void/remove the FA dated 25 Jan 13. While the AFI does state that a member who is using albuterol medication should be exempt on the walk component, the applicant did not provide justification that would prove he was taking the medication at the time of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00377

    Original file (BC-2013-00377.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the applicant's DD Form 149, he also indicated he had ankle pain when completing the sit-up component of the 31 August 2012 FA. Unfortunately, neither profile exempts him from the sit-up component. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364

    Original file (BC-2012-02364.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...