Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02581
Original file (BC-2012-02581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02581 

 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

She be allowed to transfer her Post 9/11 GI Bill educational 
benefits to her dependents. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She was given incorrect counsel in regards to the Transfer of 
Educational Benefits (TEB) prior to retirement. 

 

Soon after being diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, in Sep 09, 
she went to the local education office for information about the 
TEB. At that time, she was informed that since she would not be 
able to complete the service commitment, she was not eligible to 
transfer her Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to her dependents. 

 

She just recently found out the advice she was given was 
incorrect and that in fact she was eligible for the benefit. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 25 Oct 10, the applicant was relieved from active duty and 
permanently disability retired with a compensable rating of 
30 percent. She was credited with 10 years, 10 months, and 
27 days of active service for retirement. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends approval, noting the applicant was not 
properly informed of her ability to transfer benefits to her 
dependents. The applicant was given improper guidance by 
Education Center personnel. She clearly had the amount of time 


in service to transfer the benefit to her dependents; however, 
by the time the error was discovered, she had been placed in a 
permanent disability retired status and could not transfer this 
benefit on to her dependents. 

 

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 16 Jul 12 for review and response. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action. The Air Force office of primary 
responsibility has adequately addressed the issues presented by 
the applicant and we are in agreement with their opinion and 
recommendation. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s record 
be corrected as indicated below. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) 
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 
24 Oct 10, she elected to transfer her Post 9/11 GI Bill 
Educational Benefits. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02581 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Jun 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 2 Jul 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 12. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 


 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03204

    Original file (BC 2013 03204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on information from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), the applicant was considered and non-selected for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel (0-5) six times. On 31 Jul 09, the applicant was relieved from active duty and retired, effective 1 Aug 09, in the grade of major (0-4) with a narrative reason for separation of “Voluntary Retirement: Maximum Service or Time In Grade.” She was credited with 20 years and 8 days of total active service. Therefore, regardless of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05040

    Original file (BC-2012-05040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, the applicant retired from active duty prior to the Tranfer of Benefits becoming effective on 1 Aug 09 and, other than argument and conjecture, he has presented no evidence to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219

    Original file (BC 2013 05219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: • Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355

    Original file (BC-2012-02355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00189

    Original file (BC 2014 00189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website, it notifies the applicants that their transfer request is not final until the SOU is digitally signed in the Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF). On 12 Oct 10, an email was sent to the applicant informing her that her application for TEB had expired because she did not sign the SOU. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880

    Original file (BC-2010-00880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00386

    Original file (BC-2013-00386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouse or children. A complete copy of the DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05012

    Original file (BC-2012-05012.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05012 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had planned on retiring in April 2009;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03098

    Original file (BC-2012-03098.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03098 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. There is no record of the applicant making a Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to his dependents. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02875

    Original file (BC 2013 02875.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB requires: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ...