RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02394
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 27 December 2011
be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The wind speed exceeded limits set by AFI 36-2905, Fitness
Program, during the cardiovascular portion of the fitness
assessment.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of an
email from his commander and an AF Form 847, Recommendation for
Change of Publication, from his Flight Chief.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of Senior Airman (SrA), E-4.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 19 June 2012, a
memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional
documentation be submitted, within 30 days, to substantiate his
claim. The applicant did not provide the requested
documentation. They recommend denial of the request to have the
fitness assessment dated 29 December 2011, removed from AFFMS.
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at
Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 28 August 2012 for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit C). To date, this office has not received a
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicant's contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA
is in error or unjust. The AF Form 847, Recommendation for
Change of Publication, from his Flight Chief is noted; however,
in the absence of a letter from the local base weather
indicating the winds exceeded the maximum 15 mph sustained/20mph
gusting during the 27 Dec 11 FA, we find insufficient evidence
to warrant disturbing the record. However, should the applicant
provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider his
request. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 15 February 2013, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2012-02394:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 April 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 14 August 2012,
w/atchs
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 August 2012.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews NAF Washington, MD 20762
Dear:
Reference your application submitted under the provisions of AFI 36-2603 (Section 1552,
10 USC), AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02394.
After careful consideration of your application and military records, the Board determined
that the evidence you presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
Accordingly, the Board denied your application.
You have the right to submit newly discovered relevant evidence for consideration by the
Board. In the absence of such additional evidence, a further review of your application is not
possible.
BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
Attachment:
Record of Board Proceedings
3
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03292
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03292 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 30 May 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05001
This guidance supersedes guidelines established in AFI 36-2905 (dated 1 Jul 10), paragraph A8.2.14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the FA was conducted IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 2.1, which was applicable at the time of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01084
In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from the flight surgeon, a Report of Individual Fitness, AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report. The applicant’s overall composite score will reflect 80.25 (Satisfactory) The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02597
While the applicant provided AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Members Qualification Status, dated 2 May 2011, 11 October 2011, and 29 January 2012, which exempted her from the 1.5 mile run, pushups, and sit-up components of the contested FAs, she was evaluated on the height, weight, and abdominal circumference in accordance with her profile. Therefore, we find it reasonable to conclude that had her condition been timely diagnosed, competent authority would likely have exempted her...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00905
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPSIM states that on 23 Apr 2012, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation, specifically, a signed memorandum from the local base weather office stating that the temperature that day was less than 20 degrees Fahrenheit. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02227
DPSIM states that per AFI 36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, and AFI 10-203, the applicant’s AF Form 422 and AF Form 469 were not in compliance; however, in accordance with a 325 FW/JA Memorandum, dated 3 Aug 2012, the AF Form 469 dated 24 May 2011 and AF Form 422 dated 25 May 2011 underwent an independent Profile Officer Review and all profile officers unanimously agreed that the AF Form 422 dated 25 May 2011 accurately restricted him from the running component of the FA, however he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01543
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of the Fitness Assessment (FA) Member Illness/Injury Claim Form and various other documents. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01543 in Executive Session on 21 May 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Nov 12.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006
His providers memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test. On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02768
This logic also concludes a medical condition causing weight gain would cause an increase in AC. She should have never taken the walk test while her dosage was still being adjusted and the FA should be invalidated based on the solid medical evidence presented. While we note the applicant requests the entire FA dated 25 Apr 2012, be removed, the AF Form 422 reflected that she was cleared to test using AC and she has not provided substantial evidence to persuade us otherwise.