Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01801
Original file (BC-2012-01801.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
 

  

DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01801 

COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

 
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
He  be  allowed  to  transfer  his  Post  9/11  GI  Bill  educational 
benefits. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
He  was  not  aware  that  he  was  supposed  to  transfer  his  benefits.  
He did not transfer his benefits prior to his Reserve retirement 
and would like the opportunity to complete this transfer. 
 
In  support  of  his  appeal,  the  applicant  provides  copies  of  his 
Reserve  Retirement  order,  Reserve  Order  (RA)  EK-0190; 
DD Forms 214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active 
Duty, issued in conjunction with his most recent separations. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On  12  Jan  12,  the  applicant  was  relieved  from  his  Reserve 
assignment and transferred to the Retired Reserve.   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
NGB/A1PS  recommends  denial,  stating,  in  part,  that  they  concur 
with the NGB Subject Matter Expert's (SME) advisory and does not 
recommend  approval  of  a  change  to  his  eligibility  to  transfer 
his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family members.   
 
NGB/AlYR  contacted  the  Retention  Office  Manager  (ROM)  of  the 
applicant’s  former  Wing,  to  obtain  additional  information.    The 
ROM  stated  out-processing  counseling  was  conducted  with  him  on 

  

 

  

29 Sep 11, where they discussed GI Bill benefits, to include the 
Post  9/11  GI  Bill  and  Transfer  of  Education  Benefits  (TEB) 
requirements. 
 
In  addition  to  the  verbal  counseling,  the  ROM  had  the  applicant 
review  and  complete  a  Montgomery  GI  Bill  Retirement/Separation 
Counseling  form  (attached).    Section  One  is  the  Post  9/11  GI 
Bill TEB portion that explains the transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill 
benefits  can  only  be  done  while  serving  in  the  Armed  Forces  and 
once  a  member  separates  the  option  is  no  longer  available.    The 
form also lets the members know they are responsible to initiate 
the  transfer  request  prior  to  separation  and  gives  the  TEB 
website to do so. 
 
The  complete  NGB/A1PS  evaluation,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  30  Aug  12  for  review  and  response.    As  of  this 
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of  the  applicant's  complete  submission  in  judging  the  merits  of 
the  case;  however,  we  agree  with  the  opinion  and  recommendation 
of  the  NGB  office  of  primary  responsibility  and  adopt  its 
rationale  as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion  the  applicant  has  not 
been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.    Therefore,  in  the 
absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 

 

  
2 

 

  

application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01801  in  Executive  Session  on  13  November  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Mar 12, w/atchs. 
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
     Exhibit C.  Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 6 Aug 12, w/atchs. 
     Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Aug 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                   Panel Chair 

 

  

 

 

 

  

  



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01868

    Original file (BC-2012-01868.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01868 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits to his spouse. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01270

    Original file (BC 2012 01270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01270 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. He requests that the TEB be corrected to reflect his daughter and the 18 months of VA benefits he allocated to her in Aug 2009. He retired in Jun 2011 and submitted his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00913

    Original file (BC-2012-00913.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Post 9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) was not conveyed in a timely manner before his retirement date. However, based on the applicant's complete submission and his available military records, we find no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02762

    Original file (BC-2011-02762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. If he can provide documentation showing he attempted to change his daughter's status in DEERs prior to retiring and the Board finds there was injustice, NGB/RS recommends approval of his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GJ Bill education benefits to his dependent. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01346

    Original file (BC-2012-01346.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In an undated letter the applicant responds that he is submitting the letter to provide further explanation of his request to accomplish the Post 9/11 TEB. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. However, based on the applicant's complete submission, we find no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01300

    Original file (BC-2012-01300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in thePost-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children. While we note the comments of NGB/A1PSindicating the applicant’s squadron did not receive the Post9/11 GI Bill Informational Briefing until after the applicanthad retired, we also note the applicant never out-processedthrough the Retention Office Manager (ROM),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02236

    Original file (BC-2012-02236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02236 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Therefore, he never received the Post 9/11 GI Bill separation counseling regarding the requirement to submit the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) request before his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02744

    Original file (BC-2012-02744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air National Guard at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends approval if the Board finds there is an injustice. The complete NGB/A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS states they concur with the NGB/A1YR advisory. In this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01457

    Original file (BC-2012-01457.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He attempted to transfer his benefits to both of his sons before he retired. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility recommends approval if the Board finds an injustice. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01867

    Original file (BC-2012-01867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be authorized to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits from one of his dependents to another. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits...