Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01551
Original file (BC-2012-01551.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01551 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

 
                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 
 
IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
1.  His awarded Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be added to his record. 
 
2.  His  DD  Form  214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from 
Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 5 Sep 08 separation, 
Item  8b:  Station  Where  Separated,  reflect  Nellis  AFB  NV  rather 
than Randolph AFB TX. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
His  awarded  Bronze  Star  Medal  is  not  reflected  on  his  DD  Form 
214.   
 
He was separated at Nellis AFB; not Randolph. 
 
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of the 
award certificate for BSM and other supporting documents. 
 
The  applicant’s  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
The  applicant  enlisted  in  the  Regular  Air  Force  on  17  Jun  03.  
He  was  separated,  on  5  Sep  08,  for  misconduct  (minor 
infractions),  with  service  characterized  as  general,  under 
honorable conditions.   He was credited with 5 years, 2 months, 
and 19 days of active duty service, including 2 years, 9 months, 
and 18 days of foreign service.  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
AFPC/DPSIDR  recommends  denial,  stating,  in  part,  that  the 
documentation  provided  by  the  applicant  is  incomplete  and  does 
not appear to be authentic.  Should the applicant wish to pursue 
award of the BSM, either a special order is required showing he 
was  awarded  the  medal  or  he  should  exhaust  administrative 

appears 

to 

be 

there 

presented 

avenues  for  a  retroactive  request  of  the  award  according  to 
Section 1130 of the U.S. Code.   
 
After  a  thorough  review  of  the  applicant's  official  military 
personnel  record  DPSIDR  was  unable  to  locate  a  special  order 
awarding  the  BSM.    The  applicant  submitted  a  copy  of  a  BSM 
certificate,  dated  15  Oct  08.    The  copy  of  the  certificate 
appears to contain an Army seal; however after consultation with 
the Department of the Army, they were unable to verify the award 
of the BSM to the applicant.  In addition, after review of the 
certificate 
several 
inconsistencies with the BSM which questions the validity of the 
document.    First,  the  "Given  Under  My  Hand  in  the  City  of 
Washington" is worded "Given this 15th Day of October 2008," and 
is to the left of the seal vs. being centered above it as with 
the  standard  Bronze  Star  Medal  Certificate;  second,  the  "Given 
this  15th  Day  of  October  2008"  is  after  the  applicant  was 
discharged  from  active  service  on  5  Sept  08;  and  third,  the 
document  is  signed  by  President  George  H.  W.  Bush,  16  years 
after he left office.   
 
The  complete  DPSIDR  evaluation,  with  attachments,  is  at 
Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
A  copy  of  the  Air  Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the 
applicant  on  24  Sep  12  for  review  and  comment  within  30  days.  
As  of  this  date,  no  response  has  been  received  by  this  office 
(Exhibit D. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the  case;  however,  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary 
responsibility  has  conducted  an  exhaustive  review  of  the 
applicant’s  issue  and  we  adopt  the  rationale  expressed  as  the 
basis  for  our  conclusion  the  applicant  has  not  been  the  victim 
of  an  error  or  injustice.    In  addition,  in  regard  to  the 
applicant’s  request  for  a  change  to  his  DD  Form  214,  Item  8b: 
Station  Where  Separated, we have been advised the governing Air 
Force Instruction requires that Item 8b list the authenticating 

 
 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 

base which in this case was Randolph AFB TX.  Therefore, in view 
of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we 
find  no  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  the 
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  the 
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of 
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence  not  considered  with  this 
application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The  following  members  of  the  Board  considered  AFBCMR  Docket 
Number  BC-2012-01551  in  Executive  Session  on  15  November  2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs.  
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 17 Sep 12. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Sep 12. 
 
 
 
 
                                   Panel Chair 

 
 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY – PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05626

    Original file (BC-2012-05626.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05626 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected as follows: 1. DPSIDR states after a thorough review of the applicant's official military personnel record they were unable to verify any additional awards he may have...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00436

    Original file (BC-2012-00436.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicant’s military service records are contained in the evaluation prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit B. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00074

    Original file (BC-2012-00074.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00074 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. However, based on his submission of the original signed citation, we believe reasonable doubt has been established that he was awarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03747

    Original file (BC-2011-03747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03747 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: a. Award of the Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V), the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and the Philippine Defense Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03339

    Original file (BC 2007 03339.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 21 Dec 07, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03827

    Original file (BC-2010-03827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was recommended for a BSM while serving in a combat zone and performing duties outside the wire in areas routinely attacked by insurgents and this award should not have been downgraded for being “non-combat.” In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his MSM certificate, dated 3 Sep 08 (Permanent Order #285-008), DA Form 638, Recommendation for Award; AF IMT 77, Letter of Evaluation, Memorandum from AFPC/DPSIDR, Memorandum to AFCENT A1 Decorations, and email and phone...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00172

    Original file (BC-2006-00172.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    [Note: Pursuant to an inquiry by the AFBCMR Staff, HQ AFPC/DPPPRA advised via 13 Jul 06 email that they had noted the BSM certificate provided by the applicant (Exhibit A) but as they could find no special order or other evidence in the applicant’s file that he received the basic award, they did not recommend his separation documents be administratively corrected to reflect receipt of that decoration.] In response, the applicant provided a handwritten letter with the original BSM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04091

    Original file (BC-2012-04091.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the AM w/5BOLC, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was awarded the AM four times (basic award...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00266

    Original file (BC-2012-00266.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). His records be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). In support of the appeal, the applicant provides copies of two personal statements, Minutes of Command Awards and Decorations Board Meeting, dated 5 Nov 69, Bronze Star Medal Citation, Bronze Star Medal disapproval letter, Authorization to Wear the Combat Crew Members Badge, CRM criteria, AF Form 1042, Medical Recommendation for Flying...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02920

    Original file (BC-2010-02920.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02920 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: