RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00665 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty be corrected to reflect his service at Kunsan Air Base (AB), Republic of Korea. 2. His DD Form 214 be changed to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) with the 303rd Munitions Maintenance Squadron (MMS) in the Republic of Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records do not reflect his service in Korea and Vietnam. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his AF Form 973, Request and Authorization for Change of Administrative Orders; AF Form 1098, Personnel Action Request; AF Form 899, Request and Authorization for Permanent Change of Station – Military, AF Form 1712, Uniform Military Personnel Record and other documentation related to his request. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 5 Feb 70, the former member enlisted in the Regular Air Force. On 4 Feb 74, he was discharged with an honorable discharge. He served four years, zero (0) months and zero (0) days of total active service. AFPC has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) for his service with the 303rd MMS, Kunsan AB, Korea, as well as entitlement to the Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA) for his honorable active duty service from 5 Feb 70 to 4 Feb 74. The applicant’s records will be updated to reflect these awards. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to provide any documents to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. DPAPP verified and confirmed “boots on ground” Foreign Service time in Kunsan AB, Republic of Korea, from 30 Jun 71 to 31 Jul 72, for one year, one month and two days. Also, while assigned to the Republic of Korea, DPAPP was able to verify one day in Korat AB, Thailand on 17 Jun 72. In addition, DPAPP states the amount of Foreign Service time is correctly reflected on the applicant’s DD Form 214, therefore, no correction is needed for Foreign Service time. The complete DPAPP evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 Jul 11, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence which would persuade us that his records should be corrected to show Foreign Service in Vietnam. As such, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has failed to sustain his burden of showing he suffered either an error or an injustice. Should the applicant provide sufficient evidence in the form of travel vouchers, evaluation reports, letters of evaluations, decorations or other military documentation to substantiate his service in Vietnam, we would be willing to reconsider his request. We note the Air Force OPR was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the KDSM and AFLSA and will correct his records administratively. In view of the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00665 in Executive Session on 23 Aug 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Mar 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPAPP, Letter, dated 16 Jun 11, w/atch. Exhibit D. SAF/MRBR, Letter, 22 Jul 11. Panel Chair