Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04777
Original file (BC-2011-04777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04777 

COUNSEL: NO 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in 
Vietnam. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

In 1966, he served as a Crew Chief on a C130 aircraft and flew 
two missions hauling napalm to Da Nang Air Base, Republic of 
Vietnam. 

 

The applicant does not provide any evidence in support of his 
appeal. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who 
served on active duty from 21 July 1964 to 19 July 1968. He 
served as an Aircraft Maintenance Specialist and was 
progressively promoted to the grade of sergeant (E-4) with a date 
of rank of 1 October 1966. He was honorably discharged effective 
19 July 1968 after serving 3 years, 11 months, and 29 days on 
active duty with 1 year, 1 month, and 6 days of Foreign Service. 
His Airman Performance Report rendered for the period 21 July 
1965 through 20 July 1966 indicates he was TDY in Southeast Asia. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states that after a thorough 
review of the applicant’s military service records, they found no 
evidence to substantiate the applicant served any Foreign Service 
in Vietnam. 

 

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 


 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 20 March 2012, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
D). As of this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. If the applicant 
is able to provide any source documents, (i.e., travel vouchers, 
evaluation reports, letters of evaluation, decorations, witness 
statements, sworn affidavit, etc.) to verify his Vietnam service, 
the Board would be willing to reconsider his request. However, 
in the absence of such evidence, we find no basis to recommend 
granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-04777 in Executive Session on 24 July 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04777: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Dec 11. 

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 23 Feb 12. 

Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Mar 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04337

    Original file (BC-2011-04337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04337 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Item 30 (Remarks), on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03692

    Original file (BC-2011-03692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03692 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his Vietnam service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01274

    Original file (BC-2012-01274.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIDR states based on the applicant’s duties and responsibilities as an aircraft mechanic, his duty location (Okinawa, Japan), and the fact his DD Form 214 reflects he was awarded the VSM and RVCM, the likelihood of his having served in direct support of military operations supporting Vietnam is highly likely. This document is not inherently part of Air Force members’ personnel records; therefore, this documentation is not always...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02164

    Original file (BC-2011-02164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02164 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). There is no evidence of any time served in Vietnam. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02308

    Original file (BC-2012-02308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record he has only specifies time spent in foreign service and he needs a specific record of service in Vietnam to apply for disability and medical benefits. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 August 2012...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02163

    Original file (BC-2012-02163.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states that after a thorough review of the applicant’s military service records, they found no evidence to substantiate the applicant served any Foreign Service in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00778

    Original file (BC-2011-00778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP is unable to confirm the applicant spent any time in Vietnam based on his Master Personnel Records and requested additional information from the applicant. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03290

    Original file (BC-2012-03290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03290 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his Vietnam service. They were able to verify the applicant was assigned to Naha, Japan, from 22 Jun 67 thru 25 Dec 68; however,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03224

    Original file (BC-2011-03224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03224 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. His service in Vietnam. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02676

    Original file (BC-2011-02676.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, and eight copies of his AF Forms 626, Temporary Duty Order – Military, with dates ranging from April 1966 through June 1967. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial of the request to show Vietnam service, and states, in part, they were able to verify and confirm the applicant’s foreign service at Clark Air Base, Republic of the Philippines,...