Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04255
Original file (BC-2011-04255.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

AFBCMR BC-2011-04255 

 

 

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE 
AFBCMR 

 

 

SUBJECT: 

 

 Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our 
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we 
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that during his personally procured 
move (PPM) of his household goods (HHG) from Maxwell AFB, AL to Andrews AFB, MD 
under Special Order AE-070587, dated 14 April 2011, the Code 2 rate, which the Air Force 
utilized on 8 April 2011 to calculate his PPM incentive, was the authorized rate on file in the 
Defense Personal Property System, and his incentive was based upon 95% of that rate, resulting 
in authorized incentive amount of $11,821.11, and he was reimbursed the $109.92 which was 
erroneously collected from him in September 2011. 

 

 

 Members of the Board, on 26 June 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

Attachment: 

Ltr, PPA HQ/ECAF, dated 28 Feb 12. 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02483

    Original file (BC-2011-02483.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He would not have done a DITY move had he known the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra costs. On 2 Apr 12, PPA HQ ECAF amended paragraph 6 of their original Air Force evaluation to read “should the Board choose to provide the applicant the relief he is seeking, recommend the records be changed to reflect that under competent authority, the PPM was processed on 1 Apr 10 resulting in the utilization of low cost rates under the Transportation Operational Personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01517

    Original file (BC-2011-01517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s PPM was initiated on 14 Apr 10 via DD Form 2278, Application for Do-It-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, thereby requiring the re-calculation of his PPM from the TOPS estimate to the DPS estimate. When the PPM was re-calculated under the required DPS, the applicant’s incentive payment was reduced to $15,773.80. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: PPA HQ/DD recommends that partial relief be granted, indicating the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03079

    Original file (BC-2011-03079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03079 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for his personally procured move (PPM) as briefed to him by the Hickam Traffic Management Office (TMO), or in the alternative cover the actual cost of the PPM. He was only compensated $8,370.24, which did not cover the total move...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01334

    Original file (BC-2011-01334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She would not have done a DITY move had she known the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra costs. Effective 1 April 2010, change 283 to the JFTR requires that Government Constructed Costs (GCC) used to determine the incentive payments in PPM be based on “best value” versus the “low cost” charges. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement she could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, she was fully...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01260

    Original file (BC-2011-01260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She would not have done a DITY move had she known the correct rate provided no incentive and resulted in extra costs. Effective 1 April 2010, change 283 to the JFTR requires that Government Constructed Costs (GCC) used to determine the incentive payments in PPM be based on “best value” versus the “low cost” charges. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement she could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, she was fully...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01032

    Original file (BC-2011-01032.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01032 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for his Personally Procured Move (PPM) as briefed to him by the Hickam Transportation Management Office (TMO). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The TMO office incorrectly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01423

    Original file (BC-2011-01423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded by stating that he did not receive the briefing regarding the change in the JFTR until 25 Jun 10, two full months after the change. The TMO agreed to allow him to cancel the PPM. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement he could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, he was fully compensated for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01499

    Original file (BC-2011-01499.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant completed a DD Form 2278, Application for Do-it-Yourself Move and Counseling Checklist, and was quoted an estimated incentive payment of $19,524.78 to personally procure his move. Based on that amount, the applicant was given an advance payment of $12,331.44. ECAF recommends the applicant be reimbursed for any funds personally expended in excess of the authorized GCC.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01139

    Original file (BC-2011-01139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant stated the advisory falsely states that he did not lose any money. The recommendation only considers the gross amount and reimbursable expenses. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting the relief sought in this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01992

    Original file (BC-2011-01992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had he been briefed correctly, he would not have agreed to a PPM that provided no incentive and resulted in excess costs. Although it does appear the applicant was miscounseled regarding the amount of reimbursement he could expect to receive for a Personally Procured Move, he was fully compensated for his move and in reality received a de facto incentive through remission of the debt incurred for the excess advance initially received. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 11.