RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04252
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 29 September 2011
be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was only supposed to have a waist measurement done for the FA
test and not anything else, due to a medical condition.
He failed the test because he was unable to perform the walk as
quickly as needed due to his medical condition.
His AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, accomplished
before the test, was not accurate and was updated the day after
the test.
He should not have received a failure due to his medical
situation, which he could not control and is currently being
treated for.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his
AF Form 469, current AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force
Members Qualification Status, and Memorandum for Record from
his doctor.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of Technical Sergeant (TSgt), E-6.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio portion of the fitness
assessment dated 29 September 2011 be updated to reflect
exempt in AFFMS. After reviewing both the old and the new AF
Form 469 and current AF Form 422 it was clear that the applicant
should have been exempt from both the 1.5 mile run and 1 mile
walk portion of the test.
The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 9 December 2011 for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant
partial relief. We took notice of the applicant's complete
submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility that correction of the cardio portion of
the fitness assessment dated 29 September 2011 reflect exempt
in the Air Force Fitness Management System. The applicants
overall composite fitness score will reflect 79.00,
(Satisfactory). Accordingly, we recommend that his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show the cardio
portion of the fitness assessment dated 29 September 2011 be
amended to reflect exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management
System.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
BC-2011-04252 in Executive Session on 26 April 2012, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 October 2011, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 17 November 2011.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 December 2011
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02388
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was a discrepancy between restrictions placed on his AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 19 Apr 2012 and the testing exemptions reflected on the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 20 Apr 2012. On 23 Apr 2012, he took his copy of the AF Form 422 to his scheduled FA. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01591
On 29 Nov 2011, a medical evaluation letter was signed by the same provider who issued the previous AF Form 469s. The letter states, There are medical conditions that preclude this member from achieving a passing score on the Air Force fitness assessment. On 1 Dec 2011, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was initiated from his Medical Provider, which could exempt the applicant from the cardio and push-up components of the FA. On 27 Mar 2012, a medical evaluation letter was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01084
In support of her request, the applicant provides a letter from the flight surgeon, a Report of Individual Fitness, AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status and AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report. The applicant’s overall composite score will reflect 80.25 (Satisfactory) The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. We believe the documentation provided by the applicant provides a reasonable basis to conclude the applicant should...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04244
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to remove the contested FAs; however, they recommend updating the AFFMS to reflect Exempt for the cardio component. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 March 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01986
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01986 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA) score recorded on 6 April 2012 be adjusted to reflect incomplete in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01644
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01664
IAW AFI 36-2905, AFGM 1, dated 1 July 2010, Para 1.21.8., exempted members returning from deployment are assessed after the period of acclimatization (42 days from return to home station for RegAF) unless member requests to assess earlier. On 7 Jan 2014, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), due to Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 01675
He was on a profile at the time and should not have tested in certain components. cleared to test on the waist measurement and the 1 mile walk. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends disapproval of the applicants request to void the FA score; however, they recommend the cardio, push-up and sit-up components of the FA dated 14 Mar 12 be updated to reflect exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01675
He was on a profile at the time and should not have tested in certain components. cleared to test on the waist measurement and the 1 mile walk. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends disapproval of the applicants request to void the FA score; however, they recommend the cardio, push-up and sit-up components of the FA dated 14 Mar 12 be updated to reflect exempt in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ...