Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04245
Original file (BC-2011-04245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04245 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to show he made a timely election for 
former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He did not realize a new election was required and has 
continued to pay SBP premiums since his divorce. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
divorce decree and a DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan, 
Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage, dated 20 Oct 11. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant was married on 25 Nov 69. He elected spouse only 
SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 Aug 
91 retirement. The parties divorced on 5 Nov 03, and the 
divorce decree ordered the applicant to designate his former 
spouse as the beneficiary under the SBP. There is no evidence 
either party submitted a valid election to change spouse to 
former spouse coverage within the first year following their 
divorce as the law requires. SBP premiums continue to be 
deducted from the applicant's retired pay and DFAS-CL records 
continue to erroneously reflect his former spouse's name and 
date of birth (28 Oct 38) as the eligible spouse beneficiary. 
Neither party has remarried and, accordingly, there is no 
competing claimant. 


 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIAR reviewed this application and states there is no 
evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an 
injustice, they recommend the applicant's record be corrected 
to reflect that on 6 Nov 03, he submitted a valid election for 
former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming his 
former spouse as the eligible beneficiary. Approval should be 
contingent upon recoupment of any applicable premiums. 

 

The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 16 Dec 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To 
date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. There is no 
evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, 
we agree with AFPC/DPSIAR’s recommendation that the applicant’s 
records should be corrected to reflect that he made a valid 
election based on full retired pay, naming his former spouse as 
the eligible beneficiary. Accordingly, we recommend the 
applicant’s records be corrected as set forth below. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 6 Nov 
03, he elected former spouse coverage under the survivor 
benefit plan (SBP), based on full retired pay, naming his 
former spouse as the eligible beneficiary. 

 

_______________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 16 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

The Board voted to correct the record as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-
2011-04245 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Oct 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIAR dated 6 Dec 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02422

    Original file (BC-2012-02422.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02422 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: (APPLICANT) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouse’s records be corrected to show he made an election for “former spouse” coverage under the Survivor Benefit Program (SBP), naming her as the beneficiary. ______________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01209

    Original file (BC-2012-01209.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 27 August 1996, he elected former-spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) at the previous reduced level...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00062

    Original file (BC-2011-00062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She indicates there is no evidence the deceased former member elected former spouse coverage for any of his former spouses. In Dec 92, DFAS received an SBP Open Enrollment Election form from the member requesting to change the applicant’s coverage from spouse to former spouse. A complete copy of the AFRBA Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01307

    Original file (BC-2012-01307.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If neither the member nor the spouse requests the election change during the one-year eligibility period, former spouse coverage may not be established thereafter. Even though a member fails to notify DFAS—Cleveland (DFAS-CL) of the divorce and continues to pay SBP premiums afterword, the former spouse is not eligible for annuity payments upon the member’s death. However, should the applicant provide a notarized statement from the deceased former member’s widow relinquishing her...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02485

    Original file (BC-2011-02485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. DPSIAR states the applicant and the former member were married on 28 Mar 83 and he elected spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to being placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List (PDRL) effective 28 May 03. In this respect, although neither the former member nor the applicant filed a valid election for SBP within the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00128

    Original file (BC-2012-00128.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIAR states there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case; however, in the interest of justice and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to show he elected SBP former spouse coverage based on the previous reduced level of retired pay effective 31 May 2007, naming his former spouse as beneficiary. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04870

    Original file (BC-2011-04870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was a miscommunication; she thought she had one year from the date her former spouse signed the DD Form 2656-1, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage to comply, not one year from the date of the divorce. The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B. The applicant has not demonstrated that extraordinary circumstances exist as required for this Board to grant relief in cases of competing SBP beneficiaries.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00058

    Original file (BC-2010-00058.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE ADVISORY: The AFRBA Legal Advisor recommends denial and states in part that despite the May 03 court order directing the member to convert to former spouse coverage, federal law makes the election unavailable when the deemed election is not timely filed. If there were not a competing eligible beneficiary, the AFRBA Legal Advisor would recommend correcting the record, but there is. The complete AFRBA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03737

    Original file (BC 2007 03737.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Even though the SBP was not addressed in the divorce decree, the member could have elected former spouse coverage voluntarily within the first year following the divorce, but failed to do so. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-03347

    Original file (BC-2009-03347.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The parties divorced on 13 Nov 84, and the divorce decree ordered the member to continue the SBP on the applicant’s behalf. The deceased member’s decision not to voluntarily elect former spouse SBP coverage on the applicant’s behalf shows his intent not to provide SBP for her. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case, to include her response to the Air Force evaluation; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...