Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03601
Original file (BC-2011-03601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03601 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While stationed at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, he was part of an 
aircrew that continuously flew over the hostile air space of 
Afghanistan. He has also served over 130 hours of combat 
missions. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits documents 
extracted from his military personnel records. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 September 
2005. 

 

On 12 September 2009, the applicant was honorably released and 
transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He served 4 years on 
active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial. DPSIDRA states the applicant 
served with the 763rd Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron, Al 
Udeid Air Base, Qatar, from December 2008 to February 2009, in 
support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM and Operation ENDURING 
FREEDOM. The applicant received award of the Meritorious Unit 
Award (MUA), the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal 
(GWOT-E), and the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with 
Gold Border (AFESR w/GB) for his service in Qatar. 

 


Official documentation verifying the applicant participated in 
30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive sorties into Afghanistan was 
not provided by the applicant nor located within his official 
military record. The supporting documentation provided by the 
applicant only accounts for one sortie into Afghanistan on 
10 January 2009. Therefore they are unable to verify the 
applicant’s entitlement to the ACM. 

 

The DPSIDRA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant states he was deployed to Al Udeid Air Base from 
12 December 2008 until 12 February 2009. He participated in 
11 combat sorties into Afghanistan in support of Operation 
Enduring Freedom. In each of these combat sorties, he provided 
time-sensitive intelligence to ground forces either engaged in 
battle or about to be. The requirements state that the ACM is 
awarded to members who have served in Afghanistan or its 
contiguous air space in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM 
from 24 October 2004 to a Date to Be Announced. As he reads this 
he has met that requirement, though the paperwork goes on to say 
30 consecutive days or sorties, he argues that requirement. A 
colleague received the ACM when he requested it after separation 
with only 21 combat sorties. 

 

The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant’s contentions; however, the applicant has not 
provided any documentary evidence to substantiate his claim that 
he meets the criteria for the ACM. As such we agree with the 
opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion that the applicant has not provided evidence showing 
his entitlement to the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 


_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03601 in Executive Session on 15 March 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03601 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 September 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 6 October 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 October 2011. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 21 November 2011, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02518

    Original file (BC-2010-02518.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ACM may be awarded to members who serve or have served in Afghanistan (or its contiguous air space) in support of OEF from 24 Oct 01 to a date to be determined. Eligibility for the ICM requires service members to have served in direct support of OIF. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-02518 in Executive Session on 13 January 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03240

    Original file (BC-2012-03240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03240 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission and the available evidence of record in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00577

    Original file (BC-2010-00577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00577 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect the following: 1. The ASCM may be awarded to members of the Air Force who, after 24 Mar 99, supported a significant US military operation designated by the Chief of Staff of the Air Force as qualifying for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05085

    Original file (BC-2011-05085.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05085 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following awards: a. Only one award of the GWOT-E is authorized for serving in OEF/OIF, regardless of how many times an individual returns to serve...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2009-00802

    Original file (BC-2009-00802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). However, the award criteria for the ACM states no member shall be entitled to both the GWOT-E medal for that service. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 Mar 13, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009- 00802: Exhibit E. Record of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02701

    Original file (BC 2014 02701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect award of any other applicable medals and certificates based on his time of service. The applicant has not provided supporting documentation to show that he was deployed and participated in a “designated area” for 30 days consecutive or 60 days nonconsecutive in order to be awarded the ACM and ICM. The applicant is requesting any other applicable medals and certificates but without supporting documentation to show what acts were performed at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00612

    Original file (BC-2009-00612.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM), the Iraqi Campaign Medal (ICM), and the Meritorious Service Medal with five Oak Leaf Clusters (MSM w/5 OLC). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The guidance for award of the requested medals was not available at the time he retired in 2004. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04346

    Original file (BC-2010-04346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04346 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended to include award of the Air Force Combat Action Medal (AFCAM) and the Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM). DPSIDR states that his request for entitlement to the AFCAM has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02016

    Original file (BC-2006-02016.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response dated 2 October 2006, the applicant reiterates his earlier contentions and submits a trip report that was not submitted with his initial application (Exhibit E). After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the applicant is eligible for the award of the ICM or ACM medals. Exhibit B....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03338

    Original file (BC 2007 03338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the individual is eligible for the award of the ACM or ICM. The applicant did not provide any documentary evidence to substantiate that he is eligible for the ACM or ICM or, that he was recommended for these awards.