Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03407
Original file (BC-2011-03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03407 

COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenter the 
military. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was discharged with an RE code of “4C” (Failure to meet 
physical standards for enlistment) because of his condition of 
having migraine headaches. He has provided a letter from his 
civilian physician indicating he no longer suffers from this 
condition. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of his DD 
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, 
and a statement from his civilian physician. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force who 
served on active duty from 10 June 2007 to 14 September 2007. 

 

On 11 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his 
commander’s intent to recommend the applicant for an entry-level 
separation for fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Air 
Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, 
Chapter 5, Section C. The commander indicated the reason for his 
recommendation was that he received a medical narrative summary 
on the applicant, dated 7 September 2007, that indentified the 
applicant as not meeting minimum medical standards to enlist. 
The applicant acknowledged receipt of his commander’s intent and 
waived his right to consult counsel and to submit statements in 
his own behalf. After the Deputy Staff Judge Advocate found the 
case to be legally sufficient, the discharge authority approved 
the commander’s recommendation and directed the applicant be 
discharged with an uncharacterized, entry-level separation. 

 

The applicant was discharged with an entry-level separation, 
effective 14 September 2007, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), 


after serving 2 months and 14 days on active duty. His DD Form 
214 reflects his RE code as “4C” and a narrative reason for 
separation as “Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards.” 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AETC/SGPS supports changing the applicant’s RE code to allow him 
to reapply to re-enter military service. SGPS states the 
applicant failed to disclose his headache history during his 
accession physical. When his condition was discovered during 
basic training, the applicant chose not to pursue a waiver 
review. 

 

SGPS finds that at the time of the applicant’s separation, the 
process was completed in accordance with established policy and 
administrative procedures; however, his current medical history 
indicates he currently meets medical criteria for military duty. 

 

The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denying the applicant’s request for a 
reenlistment eligible RE code. However, the RE code of “4C” 
reflected on his DD Form 214, is in error. The correct RE Code 
is “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or 
entry-level separation without characterization of service). The 
RE code of “2C” applies to all entry-level separations without 
characterization of service regardless of whether the discharge 
is voluntary or involuntary. 

 

DPSOA indicates that if the Board’s decision is to change the 
applicant’s RE code, the only other option would be “3K” 
(Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or AFBCMR when no other reenlistment 
eligibility code applies or is appropriate). This code would 
still require a waiver from Recruiting Services. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant 
on 9 December 2011, for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 


 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case to include the differing opinions of the Air 
Force evaluators. However, the Board agrees with the opinion and 
recommendation of AFPC/DPSOA to change the applicant’s RE code 
from “4C” to “2C,” since it is the required RE code based on the 
applicant’s entry level separation with uncharacterized of 
service. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03407 in Executive Session on 26 April 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in connection 
with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03407: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 16 Aug 11, w/atchs. 

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 18 Oct 11. 

Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28 Nov 11. 

Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Dec 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334

    Original file (BC-2011-03334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of “Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03496

    Original file (BC-2011-03496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03496 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “4C” (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03614

    Original file (BC-2011-03614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03614 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03497

    Original file (BC-2011-03497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03497 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice to warrant changing the applicant’s uncharacterized entry-level separation, narrative reason for separation, and RE code. While we note...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00196

    Original file (BC-2011-00196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the character of service, and assigned separation and RE codes, was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant’s DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04534

    Original file (BC-2010-04534.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04534 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01571

    Original file (BC-2011-01571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01782

    Original file (BC-2011-01782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a consultation and medical exam from his primary care provider, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, and copies of separation documents from his military personnel records (MPR). Since the applicant does not meet medical criteria for military duty, they do not support a change to his RE code. AFPC/DPSOY will provide applicant a corrected copy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011- 00800

    Original file (BC-2011- 00800.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on a review of the records provided, the applicant entered the service on 1 Jun 10 and was separated 23 Jun 10. The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicant’s RE code to 2C, - "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02296

    Original file (BC-2011-02296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) 4C (concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or void entry level separation without...