RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02296
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry code (RE) 4C (concealment of juvenile records,
minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment,
failure to attain a 9.0 reading level as measured by the Air
Force Reading Abilities Test, or void entry level separation
without character of service) be changed to allow him to reenter
the Armed Services.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he entered basic training he had no behavior or medical
problems. While in Basic Military Training he failed the sit-up
portion of his Fitness Assessment by 6 sit-ups. He entered the
Get Fit program and while exercising he had a popping sensation
in his lower back. He was later told he had three birth
defects: fused vertebrae, a misaligned vertebrae and a
rudimentary disk. He was also told the conditions were
disqualifying and that he would not improve.
After he was discharged, he went to his family doctor who also
took x-rays of his back. He was told he did not have any
abnormalities in his back. He completed physical therapy and
his back pain has gone away. He respectfully requests this
reentry code be changed to enable him to reenter the Armed
Forces. He was given the wrong information and the resulting
decision was also wrong.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement, a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty and medical documentation.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 November
2010.
On 1 March 2011, he was notified of his commanders intent to
discharge him from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment;
specifically, he did not meet the minimum medical standards to
enlist. On 1 March 2011, the applicant acknowledged his
commanders intent to discharge him. He also acknowledged his
right to counsel and to submit matters in his behalf: he
declined both rights.
On 3 March 2011, the applicant was discharged under the
provisions of AFPD 36-32 Military Separations and Retirements
for Erroneous Enlistment. His type of separation was entry
level and his service was uncharacterized. He received a
reentry code of 4C. He was credited with serving 3 months and
19 days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AETC/SGPS recommends approval. SGPS states the separation was
done in accordance with established policy and administrative
procedures. Based on the medical report and prognosis, they
support the RE code change to allow him to reenter military
service.
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states that although the
applicant has a RE code of 4C, he should have been assigned
the code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable
discharge; or entry level separation without character of
service) per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on
his entry level separation and uncharacterized service.
DPSOA also states that while the AETC/SG does not have the
authority or an input as to the proper RE code, they are
qualified to recommend the applicant be given an opportunity to
be medically screened for reentry based on his current medical
status; DPSOA supports their recommendation. However, a
waiverable RE code, which would identify prior circumstances for
screening, would be more appropriate than circumventing the
screening and waiver process.
Unless the Board states otherwise, the applicant will be
provided a corrected DD Form 214 to reflect his RE code as 2C.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 26 August 2011, for review and comment within 30
days (Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no
response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice warranting
corrective action. In this respect, DPSOA has opined that the
applicants current RE code of 4C is incorrect and the correct
RE code is 2C. However, a recent medical evaluation submitted
by the applicant indicates he does not present the symptoms for
which he was discharged. AETC/SG has also reviewed this recent
medical documentation and supports a change of the applicants
RE code that would allow his reentry into military service. We
agree with the AETC/SG assessment and believe that that the
circumstances of the case merit changing the current RE code to
a waiverable code. Whether or not the applicant is successful
in reentering military service will depend on the needs of the
service and our recommendation in no way guarantees that he will
be allowed to return to any branch of service. Therefore, we
recommend that his records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the
time of his discharge on 4 March 2011, he was issued a reentry
code of 3K.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2011-02296 in Executive Session on 1 November 2011 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jun 11.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 25 Jul 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 1 Sep 11.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Sep 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04753
The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, a recent medical evaluation submitted by the applicant indicates she does not present symptoms or reaction to bananas. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02810
The applicant was discharged on 19 May 2008. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2C, unless otherwise directed by the board. The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 December 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E).
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01278
The applicants DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code of 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. We also note the RE code the applicant received at separation was technically incorrect and his records will be administratively corrected to reflect the RE code 2C, which accurately reflects he received an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01278 was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01853
At the time, his condition did render him unsuitable to continue military service; however, presently they support a change to his RE code. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was informed that the board has concurred to change his narrative reason for separation and will only consider changing his RE code to 3K. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00196
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the character of service, and assigned separation and RE codes, was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicants DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04700
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable and her reentry (RE) code 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow her to reenter...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00406
On 29 Jan 10, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. Although both AFPC/DPSOA and DPSOS recommend denial of relief DPSOA does note the applicants RE code is in error, and should be 2C; however, based on the review and recommendation provided by AETC/SGPS we believe his RE code should be changed to 3K, which would afford him the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed services. We note that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334
On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03407
On 11 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend the applicant for an entry-level separation for fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C. The commander indicated the reason for his recommendation was that he received a medical narrative summary on the applicant, dated 7 September 2007, that indentified the applicant as not meeting minimum medical standards to...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01571
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...