Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02296
Original file (BC-2011-02296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02296 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry code (RE) 4C (concealment of juvenile records, 
minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, 
failure to attain a 9.0 reading level as measured by the Air 
Force Reading Abilities Test, or void entry level separation 
without character of service) be changed to allow him to reenter 
the Armed Services. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

When he entered basic training he had no behavior or medical 
problems. While in Basic Military Training he failed the sit-up 
portion of his Fitness Assessment by 6 sit-ups. He entered the 
Get Fit program and while exercising he had a popping sensation 
in his lower back. He was later told he had three birth 
defects: fused vertebrae, a misaligned vertebrae and a 
rudimentary disk. He was also told the conditions were 
disqualifying and that he would not improve. 

 

After he was discharged, he went to his family doctor who also 
took x-rays of his back. He was told he did not have any 
abnormalities in his back. He completed physical therapy and 
his back pain has gone away. He respectfully requests this 
reentry code be changed to enable him to reenter the Armed 
Forces. He was given the wrong information and the resulting 
decision was also wrong. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty and medical documentation. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 


STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 November 
2010. 

 

On 1 March 2011, he was notified of his commander’s intent to 
discharge him from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment; 
specifically, he did not meet the minimum medical standards to 
enlist. On 1 March 2011, the applicant acknowledged his 
commander’s intent to discharge him. He also acknowledged his 
right to counsel and to submit matters in his behalf: he 
declined both rights. 

 

On 3 March 2011, the applicant was discharged under the 
provisions of AFPD 36-32 Military Separations and Retirements 
for Erroneous Enlistment. His type of separation was entry 
level and his service was uncharacterized. He received a 
reentry code of 4C. He was credited with serving 3 months and 
19 days on active duty. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AETC/SGPS recommends approval. SGPS states the separation was 
done in accordance with established policy and administrative 
procedures. Based on the medical report and prognosis, they 
support the RE code change to allow him to reenter military 
service. 

 

The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states that although the 
applicant has a RE code of “4C,” he should have been assigned 
the code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable 
discharge; or entry level separation without character of 
service) per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on 
his entry level separation and uncharacterized service. 

 

DPSOA also states that while the AETC/SG does not have the 
authority or an input as to the proper RE code, they are 
qualified to recommend the applicant be given an opportunity to 
be medically screened for reentry based on his current medical 
status; DPSOA supports their recommendation. However, a 
waiverable RE code, which would identify prior circumstances for 
screening, would be more appropriate than circumventing the 
screening and waiver process. 

 

Unless the Board states otherwise, the applicant will be 
provided a corrected DD Form 214 to reflect his RE code as 2C. 

 

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 


 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 26 August 2011, for review and comment within 30 
days (Exhibit E). As of this date, this office has received no 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice warranting 
corrective action. In this respect, DPSOA has opined that the 
applicant’s current RE code of 4C is incorrect and the correct 
RE code is 2C. However, a recent medical evaluation submitted 
by the applicant indicates he does not present the symptoms for 
which he was discharged. AETC/SG has also reviewed this recent 
medical documentation and supports a change of the applicant’s 
RE code that would allow his reentry into military service. We 
agree with the AETC/SG assessment and believe that that the 
circumstances of the case merit changing the current RE code to 
a waiverable code. Whether or not the applicant is successful 
in reentering military service will depend on the needs of the 
service and our recommendation in no way guarantees that he will 
be allowed to return to any branch of service. Therefore, we 
recommend that his records be corrected to the extent indicated 
below. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the 
time of his discharge on 4 March 2011, he was issued a reentry 
code of 3K. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 
2011-02296 in Executive Session on 1 November 2011 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Jun 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/SGPS, dated 25 Jul 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 1 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Sep 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04753

    Original file (BC-2010-04753.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 May 2011, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). However, a recent medical evaluation submitted by the applicant indicates she does not present symptoms or reaction to bananas. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02810

    Original file (BC 2013 02810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 19 May 2008. AFPC/DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 2C, unless otherwise directed by the board. The SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 6 December 2013, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01278

    Original file (BC-2013-01278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code of 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. We also note the RE code the applicant received at separation was technically incorrect and his records will be administratively corrected to reflect the RE code 2C, which accurately reflects he received an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01278 was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01853

    Original file (BC-2011-01853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time, his condition did render him unsuitable to continue military service; however, presently they support a change to his RE code. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states he was informed that the board has concurred to change his narrative reason for separation and will only consider changing his RE code to 3K. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00196

    Original file (BC-2011-00196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the character of service, and assigned separation and RE codes, was appropriately administered and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant’s DD Form 214 will be administratively corrected to reflect the correct RE code 2C unless otherwise directed by the Board. The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04700

    Original file (BC-2011-04700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable and her reentry (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow her to reenter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00406

    Original file (BC-2011-00406.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 Jan 10, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. Although both AFPC/DPSOA and DPSOS recommend denial of relief DPSOA does note the applicant’s RE code is in error, and should be 2C; however, based on the review and recommendation provided by AETC/SGPS we believe his RE code should be changed to 3K, which would afford him the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed services. We note that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03334

    Original file (BC-2011-03334.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 Apr 09, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service for erroneous enlistment, with an RE Code of 4C, and a narrative reason for separation of “Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03407

    Original file (BC-2011-03407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 September 2007, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to recommend the applicant for an entry-level separation for fraudulent enlistment under the provisions of Air Force Policy Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C. The commander indicated the reason for his recommendation was that he received a medical narrative summary on the applicant, dated 7 September 2007, that indentified the applicant as not meeting minimum medical standards to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01571

    Original file (BC-2011-01571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01571 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or...