Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03395
Original file (BC-2011-03395.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03395 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His date of rank (DOR) to the grade of captain be changed from 
1 Apr 11 to 7 Jun 10. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was unjustly required to remain a first lieutenant for over 
three years, which will affect his future promotion eligibility 
dates. 

 

He completed two years time-in-grade (TIG) as a first lieutenant 
on 18 Jan 10, and one year on the Reserve Active Status List 
(RASL) on 6 Jun 10. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his 
promotion orders to first lieutenant and captain, an Air National 
Guard Officer Data Verification Brief (DRB), and a Virtual 
Military Personnel Flight (VMPF) Personal Information Promotion 
Information Page. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force 
at Exhibit B. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these 
facts in this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPB recommends denial. DPB states the applicant met the TIG 
requirement based on his constructive service credit awarded at 
appointment, as of 18 Jan 10. He was not statutorily eligible 
for promotion consideration until after he had completed one year 
on the RASL and the applicant did not have one year on the RASL 
until 5 Jun 10. The next available promotion opportunity for the 
grade of captain had a convening date of 1 Oct 10, with DORs 
beginning 1 Apr 11, the applicantÂ’s current DOR. The applicant 


already has the earliest DOR possible after he met the statutory 
requirement for promotion consideration. 

 

The complete DPB evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 28 Oct 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a 
response has not been received (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 
BC-2011-03395 in Executive Session on 26 Jan 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 
BC-2011-03395 was considered: 

 


 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Aug 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, ARPC/DPB, dated 3 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Oct 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03994

    Original file (BC-2011-03994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03994 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) be changed from 1 Oct 07 to 11 Jul 06. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02218

    Original file (BC-2011-02218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of captain (Capt, O-3), be changed from 1 Oct 2001 to l Oct 1999. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicantÂ’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/CV recommends approval of the applicant's request to correct his DOR to Capt, and denial of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0202973

    Original file (0202973.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Documentation provided by the applicant indicated that while on active duty he was selected for promotion to the grade of captain with a projected date of rank of 23 Dec 98. He is currently serving in the Reserve grade of captain having been promoted to that grade, effective 1 Oct 00. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPB, dated 1 Oct 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00349

    Original file (BC-2005-00349.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    All officers selected for promotion by this board were promoted no earlier than this date, unless a request for accelerated promotion was received from the senior rater. The applicant provides another memo from the commander to the senior rater, also dated 20 Jul 04, requesting the applicant be given an accelerated promotion to major with a DOR of 15 Apr 04 (Exhibit A). The 2 Jun 04 DOR was not authorized because the FY04 board did not select the applicant.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03824

    Original file (BC-2002-03824.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFI 36-2504, he should have been transferred from the ADL to the RASL and subsequently promoted to major with an appropriate DOR as an active Reserve officer. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that the applicable statutes and regulations were properly applied in determining the applicant's date of rank to the grade...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02775

    Original file (BC-2011-02775.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this case, when the CY11 board considered the applicant, he did not have the required OPR in his records. In view of this and noting the fact that a required, HAF-directed OPR was not a matter of record when his record was considered for promotion by the CY11 major board, we find the applicant was denied fair and equitable promotion consideration to the grade of major based on an incomplete record. In view of this, and noting the applicant did not have a sufficient record of performance...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0001994

    Original file (0001994.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Promotion Board Secretariat, HQ ARPC/DPB, stated that the applicant provided a copy of the mandatory [in- and above-the- promotion zone (I/APZ)] and Position Vacancy (PV) date of rank (DOR) requirements for the 99 March Chaplains Captain Selection Board. As DPB previously stated, HQ ARPC/HC provided a letter attesting that the IMA chaplains did not have any PV quotas available for the FY00 Captains...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02698

    Original file (BC-2011-02698.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: A break in service which was corrected by the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR) caused his DOR to major to be incorrect. The applicant was considered and selected by the CY10 major promotion board with a DOR of 1 October 10. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00566

    Original file (BC-2006-00566.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00566 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 Aug 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the Reserve grade of captain or major. He was in the Air Force Reserve until 29 Sep 55 as a pilot with no promotion in rank. Complete copies of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02745

    Original file (BC-2011-02745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Before joining the Air Force Reserve, he was selected for promotion to major by the Calendar Year 2006B (CY06B) Active Duty board in Sep 06. AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion, Continuation, and Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, paragraph 6.4, states that any officer selected for promotion to a higher grade, who transfers from the ADL to the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) of the same armed force, will receive their promotion providing the officer remains in the same competitive...