Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03289
Original file (BC-2011-03289.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03289 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His official records be corrected to show he was awarded the 
Purple Heart (PH) Medal. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was stationed at Da Nang Air Base, Vietnam in Nov 65, when 
his unit came under attack and he was shot in the thigh. When 
he reported to the medical unit they were too busy to see him, 
and the bullet came out easily, so they removed it and sent him 
back to his unit. He still has a scar from the wound. 

 

In another incident a couple of months later, he was cutting a 
gasket when the knife slipped, cutting his left knee and 
requiring five stitches. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides an expanded 
statement, copies of photos of his two scars, his Awards 
Entitlement Record, and DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered service on 18 Jun 64, served in Thailand 
from 11 Aug 66 to 7 Aug 67, was honorably discharged on 17 Jun 
68, and was credited with four years of active service, which 
included 11 months and 27 days of foreign service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence 
of an error or injustice. The PH Medal is awarded for wounds 
received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e. gunshot or 
shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft 
bail out injuries, etc.). In addition, it is necessary that the 
wound required or received treatment by medical personnel. 
There is no official documentation verifying the applicant 
received and was treated for a gunshot wound to his thigh while 
in Vietnam in 1965, nor did he provide any. Furthermore, there 
is no official documentation verifying the applicant was in 
Vietnam in 1965. According to the applicant’s military record 
he was assigned to Loring Air Force Base, Maine from Dec 64 
until Jun 66. The incident wherein the applicant cut himself 
with a knife is not a qualifying injury for consideration of 
award of the PH Medal as it is not a wound received as a direct 
result of enemy action. Furthermore, official medical 
documentation shows the applicant reported cutting himself on 
the left knee in 1964 and received medical treatment at an 
unknown hospital in Washington D.C. 

 

A complete copy of AFPC/DPSIDRA’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant’s wife responded by acknowledging it was she who 
submitted the application for the PH Medal on behalf of her 
husband, and basically restated the information in the 
application. He served in Da Nang from Aug 66 to Feb 67, and 
then in Thailand from Feb 67 to Aug 67. He was exposed to Agent 
Orange in Vietnam and Thailand. His doctors say he is 
exhibiting signs of Parkinson’s disease which could be the 
result of exposure to Agent Orange, and hearing loss in his left 
ear which could be from exposure to rapid gunfire and heavy 
equipment (Exhibit E). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 


(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03289 in Executive Session on 3 April 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Aug 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 6 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 11. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Nov 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04630

    Original file (BC-2011-04630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for a head injury received during a rocket attack while on temporary duty (TDY) to Da Nang Air Base (AB) Republic of Vietnam. The complete AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at exhibit D. ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force Evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 24 February 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00812

    Original file (BC-2004-00812.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of his military record reveals insufficient medical documentation to substantiate his claim that he received any injury as a direct result of enemy action. Extensive research would be needed to determine if the incident is recorded in the daily unit records or with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 9 and 20...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04889

    Original file (BC 2013 04889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served two tours in Vietnam and was injured twice, but was not awarded the PH. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02141

    Original file (BC-2011-02141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with AFM 900-3, during the period in question, the Purple Heart (PH) was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy, or as a direct result of an act of any enemy, opposing armed force, or hostile foreign force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01938

    Original file (BC-2011-01938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He believes “it is not intended that such a strict interpretation of the requirement for the wound or injury to be caused by direct result of hostile action be taken that it would preclude the award being made to deserving personnel.” Commanders must also take into consideration the circumstances surrounding an injury even if it appears to meet the criteria. In support of his request, the applicant provides an SF Form 502, Medical Record - Narrative Summary, dated 15 Jul 67. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04211

    Original file (BC-2011-04211.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He received stitches for a head injury. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Jan 12 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the available evidence and applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the PH.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03062

    Original file (BC-2011-03062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service is documented on three separate DD Forms 214, none of which indicate he was awarded the PH or PUC. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05390

    Original file (BC 2013 05390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05390 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Thailand (administratively corrected) and Vietnam. However, there was no evidence provided or located in the applicant’s personnel records to substantiate he served in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02891

    Original file (BC-2011-02891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIDR states the applicant provided as evidence a personal statement dated 17 May 11, which contains a detailed description of the incident, as well as his visit to the doctor after being evacuated. Also, he provided an eyewitness account dated 17 Jun 11. The eyewitness statement supports the applicant’s description of the incident; however, neither the applicant nor the eyewitness mention the dates or rank of the applicant at the time of the incident.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03124

    Original file (BC-2011-03124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). On 20 Sep 11, AFPC/DPSIDRA notified the applicant of their determination of his entitlement to four Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to his previously awarded Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and their action...