Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04630
Original file (BC-2011-04630.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04630 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be 
corrected to reflect his Vietnam service. 

 

2. He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) for a head injury 
received during a rocket attack while on temporary duty (TDY) to 
Da Nang Air Base (AB) Republic of Vietnam. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

While stationed at Ching Chuan Kang (CCK) AB, Taiwan he was 
assigned on temporary duty as an aircraft refueler at DA Nang 
AB, Vietnam, from 22 July 1972 through 1 September 1972. 

 

During a rocket attack on Da Nang, while performing his duties, 
he was struck across the back of the head by an unknown object. 
He reported to the base hospital and received stitches for the 
head wound. He was not aware that he was entitled to the PH for 
his head wound. He should have been awarded the PH because this 
incident happened in a war zone while he was on active duty. 
The head wound led to his medical retirement, for seizure 
disorder, in 1991. 

 

Within a month of his retirement he was diagnosed with diabetes. 
He is the only member of his family with diabetes. The diabetes 
was caused by his exposure to Agent Orange in the water they 
drank and showered in while at Da Nang AB. 

 

In support of his request the applicant submits a personal 
statement and a copy of his White House correspondence package. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 


STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 
8 September 1970 and was honorably discharged on 2 April 1974. 
He served 3 years, 6 months and 25 days of active duty, of 
which, 1 year, 2 months, and 28 days is credited as Foreign 
and/or Sea Service. 

 

The applicant’s DD Form 214 does not reflect Vietnam service or 
award of the PH. 

 

______________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states a review of the 
applicant’s Master Personnel Records and documentation submitted 
failed to provide any documents that substantiate foreign 
service time in Vietnam. They were able to verify and confirm 
foreign service boots on the ground at Ching Chuan Kang Air 
Base, Taiwan, from 20 March 1972 to 16 June 1973, which is 
correctly reflected on the applicant’s DD Form 214. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial. DPSIDRA states the applicant 
has not provided a detailed personal account to include a date 
of injury, medical documentation verifying he received a wound 
as a direct result of enemy action that required medical 
treatment, and eyewitness statement(s) to support his claim. 
Furthermore, the Directorate of Assignments has been unable to 
verify boots on the ground in Vietnam. 

 

The Purple Heart (PH) is awarded for wounds received as a direct 
result of enemy actions (e.g., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-
to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bail-out injuries, etc.). 
In addition, it is necessary that the wound required or received 
treatment by medical personnel. Indirect injuries do not meet 
the criteria for award of the PH. These include, but are not 
limited to, injuries received while seeking shelter from mortar 
or rocket attacks, aircraft bombings, grenades, and injuries 
incurred while serving as an aircrew member or in a passenger 
status as a result of the aircraft’s evasive measures against 
hostile fire, or Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. 

 

Agent Orange is a defoliant that was administered by the United 
States government. Exposure to Agent Orange is not a qualifying 
injury for which the PH is awarded. Chemical, biological, or 
nuclear agents not released by an armed enemy of the United 
States do not qualify for entitlement to the PH. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDRA evaluation is at exhibit D. 

 


______________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force Evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 24 February 2012 for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit E). To date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, we 
find no basis to favorably consider this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
BC-2011-04630 in Executive Session on, 17 July 2012 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 


 Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 4 August 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 28 December 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 6 February 2012. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 February 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 


 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00178

    Original file (BC-2012-00178.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, a copy of a document extracted from his military personnel records and a notarized letter from a former coworker attesting to his service in the Republic of Vietnam. No documentation was provided to verify the applicant served in Vietnam, or any area for which the VSM is authorized for the specified period of time. We believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam based on the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2002-02804

    Original file (BC-2002-02804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He needs his DD Form 214, dated 10 April 1975, corrected to show he served in Vietnam in 1971. The Vietnam Service Medal was awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served at any time between 4 July 1965, and 28 March 1973, in Vietnam or its contiguous waters or airspace, or, for any period of service during the same time period in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia or the air spaces...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 02804

    Original file (BC 2002 02804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He needs his DD Form 214, dated 10 April 1975, corrected to show he served in Vietnam in 1971. The Vietnam Service Medal was awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served at any time between 4 July 1965, and 28 March 1973, in Vietnam or its contiguous waters or airspace, or, for any period of service during the same time period in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia or the air spaces...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03966

    Original file (BC-2011-03966.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect his foreign service to Vietnam, Thailand, and the Philippines. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00947

    Original file (BC-2009-00947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00947 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with Vietnam service time from Sep 64 through Jan 65. The historian states “the crews rotating in and out most assuredly deployed with aircraft mechanics from the 314th OMS who accompanied the aircraft to all deployed and TDY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2009 00947

    Original file (BC 2009 00947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00947 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with Vietnam service time from Sep 64 through Jan 65. The historian states “the crews rotating in and out most assuredly deployed with aircraft mechanics from the 314th OMS who accompanied the aircraft to all deployed and TDY...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03289

    Original file (BC-2011-03289.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. There is no official documentation verifying the applicant received and was treated for a gunshot wound to his thigh while in Vietnam in 1965,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03791

    Original file (BC 2012 03791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Nov 12, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that after a complete review of his official military records and the documentation he provided, they were able to verify and confirm his boots on ground foreign service time in U-Tapao Air Base, Thailand, from 7 January 1969 to 26 February 1969, for 1 month, and 20 days, as well as his service at Ching Chuan Kang Air Base, Taiwan, from 20 January 1970 to 7 July 1970, for 5 months, and 18 days. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00663

    Original file (BC-2007-00663.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He flew missions into Vietnam when he was stationed at Ching Chaun AF, Taiwan and his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge does not indicate his service in Vietnam or the medals he received. His record does show he was assigned to Ching Chuan AB, Taiwan during his career in the Air Force. The Board notes the applicant’s records show he did serve in Taiwan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01430

    Original file (BC-2006-01430.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Directorate of Assignments after a thorough review of the applicant’s records verified he was on ground in Vietnam in February 1972. The documentation provided by the applicant and his military records do not substantiate he had an injury that met the criteria for award of the PH; nor has he provided any evidence to substantiate the request for award of the PH, such as an eyewitness statement validating the incident relating to the injuries. Exhibit H. Letter, Applicant’s Counsel,...