Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02606
Original file (BC-2011-02606.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02606 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for 
promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the CY11A 
Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) with inclusion 
of the Joint Service Achievement Medal (JSAM) in his Officer 
Selection Record (OSR). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Due to delays beyond his control, his record was evaluated 
without inclusion of his JSAM that details his Joint Combatant 
Command (COCOM) staff experience during a recent deployment. His 
deployment ended 8 Jan 11, but the JSAM was not signed and 
updated in his record until after the board convened due to admin 
delays. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of the 
award package. 

 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of 
major (0-4). He was non-selected for promotion to the grade of 
lieutenant colonel (0-5) by the CY11A CSB. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial. DPSOO states the applicant’s JSAM 
Permanent Order 074-001 was published on 15 Mar 11; therefore, 
the citation was not required to be filed in his OSR until 15 Apr 
11. The absence of the JSAM in his P0511A OSR is not an error, 
not only was the JSAM awarded after the convening of the board, 
but it was not required to be in his record until 15 Apr 11. 


 

 

The DPSOO complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 19 Aug 11 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, this office has received no response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-02606 in Executive Session on 29 Sep 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence for BC-2011-02606 was 
considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Jun 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 2 Aug 11 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 219 Aug 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 


 

 

 





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00525

    Original file (BC-2012-00525.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His corrected Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 28 October 2008 thorough 27 October 2009 be reconsidered for supplemental promotion consideration by the Calendar Year 2010A (CY10A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Line of the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00231

    Original file (BC-2012-00231.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The board convened on 6 Jun 11 and the report was not signed and finalized until 25 Jul 11, after the board convened. To allow the OPR to be considered for SSB consideration with signature dates on or after the CY11A Col Chaplain CSB convening date would allow the applicant a potential promotion selection advantage other officers are not afforded whose evaluations closed out in similar timeframes prior to the CSB convening. The complete DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOO...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02317

    Original file (BC-2012-02317.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her promotion record was not complete at the time of the CY11A Lt Col CSB which prevented the promotion board from making a proper determination on her qualifications/competitiveness for promotion. Her Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 1 May 2011 was not filed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) for the original CY11A Lt Col CSB. The non-selection received by the CY11A Lt Col CSB SSB was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02690

    Original file (BC-2007-02690.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He researched the problem and was informed by AFPC that the Air Force Automated Records Management System showed source documents for one Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) and one JSAM, but the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) indicated updates for one AFAM and two JSAMs. In support of his application, the applicant provided a memorandum, his pre-board and as-met records, and e-mail communiqué. Each eligible officer for promotion is provided an OPB several months prior to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04015

    Original file (BC-2010-04015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04015 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2010A (CY10A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection Board (CSB) with inclusion of his Officer Performance Report...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04368

    Original file (BC-2011-04368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04368 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS: Her Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period of 10 May 2010 through 9 May 2011 be included as part of the “As Met” record for consideration for promotion to the grade of Colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the calendar year (CY) 2011...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03469

    Original file (BC-2012-03469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant fails to recognize that the PRF is not the only record which documents performance within the Officer Selection Record (OSR) at the time of CSB promotion consideration. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denying the applicant’s request for direct promotion to the grade of Lt Col; however, they support Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration in order for the applicant to write a letter to the CY2011A Lt Col CSB highlighting...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05120

    Original file (BC-2011-05120.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MSM was approved and placed in his records and was considered by the P0511A promotion board. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit B and C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDRA recommends denial. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01777

    Original file (BC-2010-01777.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01777 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following documents be expunged from her records: 1. We concur with the Air Force offices of primary responsibility that the applicant’s record be considered by an SSB for the CY09D Major CSB with inclusion of her ANCC certificate for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00611

    Original file (BC-2012-00611.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was not recommended for a permanent change of station (PCS) decoration for her service between March 2006 and June 2008, because she did not have a current PT on file, even though the squadron commander had waived the requirement. 2 AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of a decoration for her service between March 2006 and June 2008. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial of the applicant’s request for...