RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03532 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He receive Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) for Fiscal Year 2011 
(FY11) in the amount of $10,000. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He applied for the ACP entitlement on 1 Oct 10; however, the NDAA 
was not signed into law until February 2011. As such, he was 
informed that he must submit an application for correction of his 
records in order to receive the ACP entitlement. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his 
ACP package. 

 

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard 
(ANG) in the grade of major (0-4). 

 

The applicant’s Fiscal Year 2011 Navigator and Combat System 
Operator Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) Agreement Statement of 
Understanding, dated 12 Apr 11, reflects he elected Option C - 
$10,000/Yr (RC-26 Counter Drug CSOs and RPA Operators only). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

NGB/A1PF states that after reviewing the applicant’s eligibility 
for ACP, they have concluded that, as presented, he is ineligible 
and should not be permitted to request, execute, or be paid for 
the FY11 ACP agreement. However, A1PF acknowledges that in order 
to properly determine his eligibility, they need the following 
documents: 


 

 a. Signed ACP Agreement (all signatures, initials, blocks 
completed). 

 

 b. Current set of orders. 

 

 c. Current Aeronautical Order. 

 

 d. ACP Coordinator spreadsheet showing requested dates, TAFMS 
and retirement eligibility date. 

 

 e. Proof of Undergraduate Flying Training (UFT) graduation date 
(typically an Individual Data Summary – IDS), proof receiving 
ACIP (Flight pay). 

 

 f. All documents pertaining to any previous ACP agreements (if 
applicable). 

 

The current submission is missing the ACP Coordinator spreadsheet 
and proof of UFT Graduation (IDS). If the applicant provides the 
missing documents, A1PF will review his case again. 

 

The complete NGB/A1PF evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant responded by providing the missing documents 
requested by NGB/A1PF. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we have been advised by NGB/A1PF that the 
applicant did not meet ANG FY11 ACP eligibility requirements, as 
he did not complete Undergraduate Navigator Training (UNT) until 
16 October 2000. In accordance with governing policy, in order 
to be eligible, he must have served 10 years after completing 
either UNT or Undergraduate Flying Training. The applicant’s 
current ACP request is to start ACP on 1 October which is 15 days 


prior to him becoming eligible. Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2011-03532 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Sep 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1PF, dated 3 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Oct 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 8 Nov 11, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair