Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02111
Original file (BC-2011-02111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02111 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) second oak 
leaf cluster (2nd OLC). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was awarded the AFAM 2nd OLC for work performed. He has the 
official decoration, but because the decoration is so old, they 
cannot locate the special order. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides e-mail traffic 
regarding the special order, and copies of the other AFAMs along 
with their special orders. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to the applicant’s request are 
contained in the Air Force advisory. Accordingly, there is no 
need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR states they were able to 
locate the AFAM 2nd OLC citation in the applicant’s official 
military record; however, the special order needed to validate 
the decoration was not provided or located with this record. 
Without the special order, they are unable to verify the 
applicant’s entitlement to the AFAM. 

 

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

 

 


 

 

AFPC/DPSOE does not make a recommendation. DPSOE states should 
the Board grant the application, supplemental promotion 
consideration would not be necessary as he would be rendered a 
select for promotion to Master Sergeant for promotion cycle 
11E7. 

 

The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 29 July 2011, for review and comment within 30 
days. As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office (Exhibit E). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. Although 
the applicant was unable to provide a copy of the special order 
awarding him the AFAM, we believe the AFAM citation second oak 
leaf cluster found in his Master Personnel File provides a 
reasonable basis to conclude he was awarded the AFAM. We elect 
to resolve any doubt in favor of the applicant. Accordingly, we 
recommend his record be corrected as indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 
1 December 1995, he was awarded the Air Force Achievement Medal, 
for outstanding achievement during the period 17 November 1995 
to 23 November 1995. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

The Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-02111 in Executive 
Session on 12 October 2011, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 


 

 

 

All members voted to correct the record, as recommend. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-
2011-02111 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 May 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 14 Jun 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 12 Jul 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Jul 11. 

 

 

 

 

 
Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00984

    Original file (BC 2014 00984.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00984 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for outstanding achievement, rendered for the period 15 May 08 through 26 Jun 13, be replaced by the AFAM, First Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) for outstanding achievement for the period 26 Jun 13 through 14 Aug 13. However, it appears the approval authority recognized the error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02522

    Original file (BC-2009-02522.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C & D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial. DPSIDR notes the VMPF data printout provided by the applicant indicates an MSM was approved on 2 Jul 01 by Special Order (SO) GC-283; however, the official SO 283...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04076

    Original file (BC-2010-04076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was notified by the Base Records Office that the basic AFAM was missing from her personnel records and she needed to provide a copy or her records would be changed to reflect the assumed discrepancy. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Apr 11, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900161

    Original file (9900161.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    For a decoration to be eligible for consideration in a promotion cycle, the close-out date of the decoration must be on or before the PECD, and the date of the RDP must be before the date of selections for the cycle in question. Current Air Force promotion policy (AFI 36-2502, Table 2.2, Rule 5, Note 2) dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close-out date of the decoration must be on or before the promotion eligibility cutoff date (PECD), and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01505

    Original file (BC-2011-01505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIDR was able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the SWASM w/1BSS for his service in Cairo West from 11 Mar 93 to 17 Jun 93, the ACM w/ 1BSS, the Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon with one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFESR w/1OLC), and the NATO-ISAF for his service in Afghanistan from 4 Feb 07 to 9 Aug 07. The MUA is awarded to Air Force active duty, Reserve and Guard units for exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding achievement or service in direct...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02017

    Original file (BC-2006-02017.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore the only remaining issue before the Board is the award of the ICM. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 15 September 2006, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01576

    Original file (BC-2002-01576.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) be upgraded to a Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for action performed on 13 November 1982. b. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 1 October 1984, he was awarded an Air Force Achievement Medal (AFAM) for Heroism for his actions on 13 November 1982. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01357

    Original file (BC-2011-01357.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSOE states the first time the decoration in question (worth one point) would have been used in the promotion process was cycle 08E6 to the grade of TSgt. At the time of the DPSOE evaluation, the applicant had been considered and non-selected for promotion to TSgt three times (cycles 08E6, 09E6, and 10E6). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03948

    Original file (BC-2012-03948.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His corrected record, be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB). In support of his request the applicant submitted copies of his DLAB and DLPT scores, USCENTAF Form 1, Air Medal (AM) and Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM) Mission Information – Justification Sheet, citations for the Air Medal Second and Third Oak Leaf Cluster, a memorandum from his commander and supporting documents. The complete AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00527

    Original file (BC-2010-00527.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00527 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: An order number be assigned to her award of the Air Force Achievement Medal Second Oak leaf Cluster (AFAM/2OLC) for the period 1 January 2007 through 4 February 2008. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the...