Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02055
Original file (BC-2011-02055.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02055 

COUNSEL: 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to 
honorable. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His discharge was unjust because it was based on racial 
discrimination and racial prejudice by the leadership of his 
unit. He was a young man who wanted to make a career in the Air 
Force. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits character 
reference letters, a copy of his DD Form 214, Report of 
Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, and a copy 
of his discharge certificate. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The discharge package was not located in the military personnel 
record. Available records indicate the following: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 7 September 
1949. He was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10. He 
received a general discharge. He served 3 years, 3 months and 
29 days on active duty. He had four days lost time under Section 
VI, Article 140 UCMJ. 

 

On 1 April 1952, the applicant was involved in an incident that 
resulted in the misuse and abuse of two government vehicles, 
namely a tug and fork lift. For this misconduct, he received a 
Letter of Admonishment (LOA). 

 

 

On 18 June 1951, the applicant did without proper authority, 
absent himself from his organization. 


 

On or about 8 August 1952, the applicant did without proper 
authority, absent himself from his organization. For this 
misconduct, he was reduced in grade from airman second class to 
airman third class. 

 

On or about 5 October 1952, the applicant was drunk and 
disorderly in quarters. For this misconduct, he was reduced in 
grade from airman third class to airman basic. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we see no 
evidence to show the applicant’s discharge was erroneous or 
unjust. However, while the discharge may have been appropriate 
at the time, we believe an upgrade is warranted in this case. We 
note the applicant’s FBI report contains no entries prior or 
subsequent to his enlistment in the Air Force. In view of the 
applicant’s apparent successful transition to civilian life, as 
evidenced by his post-service accomplishments, the Board is of 
the opinion that upgrading the applicant’s discharge to 
honorable, based on clemency would be appropriate. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force 
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 9 January 
1953, he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable 
Discharge certificate. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-02055 in Executive Session on 23 February 2012, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2011-02055 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 May 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00982

    Original file (BC-2005-00982.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 June 1952, the applicant’s commanding officer submitted a request for the applicant to appear before a Board of Officers, under the provisions of AFR 39-16, to determine if he was inapt or unsuitable for further retention in the United States Air Force (as indicated in a report by a psychiatrist). The applicant was present, and it is indicated in the proceedings that he expressed his desire to be discharged from the service. He stated he did not desire a copy of the board record...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01569

    Original file (BC-2011-01569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01569 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 24 April 1954, the applicant’s commander initiated separation action under the provisions of Air Force Regulation 35-66 indicating the applicant had waived his right to a board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 04042

    Original file (BC 2007 04042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 January 1955, following the Judge Advocate’s finding that the case was legally sufficient, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s discharge under the provision of AFR 39-17 and directed he be discharged with an undesirable discharge. He was credited with 1 year, 5 months and 13 days of active duty with 380 days lost time. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-1995-02072

    Original file (BC-1995-02072.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 January 1980, the applicant appeared, with counsel, before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB), to appeal that his discharge be upgraded to honorable. We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, the applicant has not provided any information concerning his post- service activities and accomplishments for us to conclude that he has overcome the behavioral traits which caused the discharge, and we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient to compel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00039 ADDENDUM

    Original file (BC-2011-00039 ADDENDUM.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00039 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Always on time for work, doing his job well and not causing any problems. During that time, he married and had a daughter.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00706

    Original file (BC-2010-00706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 June 1955, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 39-16, Discharge for Unsuitability, with a general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 22 July 1955, he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02055

    Original file (BC-2004-02055.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02055 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01465

    Original file (BC-2004-01465.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01465 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 29 October 1953, the discharge authority approved the separation recommended by the Board of Officers and directed that applicant be discharged with an undesirable discharge. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02044

    Original file (BC-2007-02044.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was only 17 when he entered the military, and he was not convicted in any military court. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 17 December 1953, he was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03189

    Original file (BC-2003-03189.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 November 1952 for a period of four (4) years in the grade of airman third class. Applicant was discharged on 13 November 1953, in the grade of airman basic with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge, under the provisions of AFR 39-21 (Fraudulent Entry Into the Air Force). However, today a fraudulent entry would receive an honorable discharge and considering the discharge occurred 50 years ago and the type of offense leading...