Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01224
Original file (BC-2010-01224.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2010-01224
                                             INDEX CODE:  100.00
      XXXX                              COUNSEL:  NONE

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  YES


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was originally recommended for award of the DFC for  his  actions  on  16
February 1945; however, he was shot down nine days later and interned  as  a
Prisoner-of-War (POW) until May 1945.

On the date in question, while  serving  as  a  First  Pilot  on  a  bombing
mission  against  the  Obertraubling  Airdrome,  Regensburg,  Germany,   his
aircraft experienced a burst of flak which caused the  propeller  of  engine
number three to become uncontrollable and resulted in  a  fire  near  engine
number four while on the final bomb run.  Despite this, he continued on  the
bomb run and released his bombs, with considerable accuracy.

In support of his  appeal,  the  applicant  submits  copies  of  his  flight
records, the original DFC recommendation, a statement from  his  Senator,  a
proposed citation, a 1965 statement  from  the  former  group  commander,  a
statement from a fellow pilot involved in the mission, and a statement  from
his former squadron commander.

The former squadron commander states that three days after  the  mission  he
drafted  a  proposed  DFC  citation  to  recognize  the  applicant  for  his
extraordinary achievement  during  the  mission;  however,  he  relinquished
command and transferred command to a new  duty  station  shortly  after  the
mission.

In his 1965 statement, the former group commander indicates that in view  of
the number of missions that he had flown and the  information  contained  in
the copy of the citation  which  he  provided,  he  would  have  approved  a
recommendation for the DFC for his achievement during the 16  February  1945
mission.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a retired Regular  Air  Force  colonel,  who  is  a  former
member of the Army  Air  Corps,  who  served  in  the  European  Theatre  of
Operation from 22 April 1944 to 15 August 1945, as a B-24 pilot assigned  to
the 759th Bombardment  Squadron,  459th  Bombardment  Group,  Fifteenth  Air
Force.  During this period, he completed a  total  of  21  combat  missions,
totaling 240 combat hours, participating in the  Europe  Air  Combat,  North
Appennies, Po Valley, and Rome-Arno campaigns.  He  was  awarded  three  Air
Medals  for  sustained  operational  activities  against  the   enemy.    In
addition, he was also awarded  the  Purple  Heart  for  wounds  received  in
action against the enemy on 28 February 1945.

The DFC was established by Congress  on  2 July  1926  and  is  awarded  for
heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in  aerial  flight.


The Air Force  Decoration  Board,  Secretary  of  the  Air  Force  Personnel
Counsel, received a similar request under the provisions of Section 526,  of
the Fiscal Year 1996 National Defense Authorization  Act  (NDAA)  and  would
not consider the request, as there was no  approval  of  the  recommendation
from someone in the applicant’s chain of command.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice  warranting  award  of  the  DFC.   In  this
respect, we note the evidence of record and the  documentation  provided  in
support of this appeal indicates the applicant  was  originally  recommended
for award of the DFC for his actions on 16 February 1945  three  days  after
the mission; however, he was shot down nine days later  and  interned  as  a
Prisoner-of-War (POW) until May 1945.  Moreover, shortly after  the  mission
the recommending official (squadron  commander),  relinquished  command  and
transferred to a new duty station.  In  1965,  the  former  group  commander
reviewed a copy of the original 1945 recommendation  package  and  indicated
that  he  would  have  approved  the  recommendation  for  the   applicant’s
achievement during the 16 February 1945 mission as a first  pilot,  in  view
of the number of missions he flew  and  the  information  contained  in  the
proposed citation.  While there is no evidence to indicate that  during  the
period in question, the Fifteenth Air Force awarded the  DFC  for  sustained
operational activities, i.e., number of missions  completed,  as  did  other
numbered Air Forces, in view of the 1965 statement  from  the  former  group
commander, we  find  the  applicant  has  met  his  burden  of  proving  the
recommendation was approved by someone in his  chain-of-command.   While  we
are unable to determine what previous action was taken in response  to  this
statement in 1965, we find no basis to question the decision of  his  former
group commander as to the appropriate level of recognition for  his  actions
on 16 February 1945.  Therefore, we recommend his records  be  corrected  to
the extent indicated below.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issue(s) involved.  Therefore, the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that  he  was  awarded  the  Distinguished
Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement on 16 February  1945,  in  aerial
flight as a pilot of a B-24 aircraft in the European Theater of Operations.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2010-01224
in Executive Session on 27 May 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Vice Chair
                       Member
                       Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 Mar 10, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.






                                  Vice Chair

AFBCMR BC-2010-01224




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXX, be corrected to show that he was awarded the
Distinguished Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement on 16 February
1945, in aerial flight as a pilot of a B-24 aircraft in the European
Theater of Operations.








JOE G. LINEBERGER

Director

Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02052

    Original file (BC-2006-02052.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02052 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal. In 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179

    Original file (BC-2005-02179.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00357

    Original file (BC-2005-00357.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00357 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal (AM). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073

    Original file (BC-2005-02073.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00510

    Original file (BC-2007-00510.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was never awarded an additional AM for his 26th through 30th combat missions In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the former 67th Deputy Squadron Navigator recommending him for award of the DFC and an additional oak leaf cluster to the AM, and a list of his combat missions. The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded for heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01548

    Original file (BC-2007-01548.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01548 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 November 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two oak leaf clusters to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and three additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In view of the above,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00420

    Original file (BC-2007-00420.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In view of his completion of a total of 37 combat missions and based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding an AM upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions and awarding a DFC upon the completion of 35 combat missions, he should be awarded the DFC and an additional AM. In view of the above, and since the applicant never received a DFC for his completion of a combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00386

    Original file (BC-2004-00386.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM or DFC based solely on the number of combat missions completed, but rather for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. Applicant’s records do not indicate he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03794

    Original file (BC-2004-03794.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In BC-2004-02294, the AFBCMR awarded a DFC to an applicant who had also completed more than the required ten missions as a lead navigator and an additional oak leaf cluster for completion of a tour of 32 combat missions. AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01247

    Original file (BC-2006-01247.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01247 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXX (DECEASED) COUNSEL: DR ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 OCT 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and awarded the Air Medal (AM) with five Oak Leaf Clusters...