RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01224
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was originally recommended for award of the DFC for his actions on 16
February 1945; however, he was shot down nine days later and interned as a
Prisoner-of-War (POW) until May 1945.
On the date in question, while serving as a First Pilot on a bombing
mission against the Obertraubling Airdrome, Regensburg, Germany, his
aircraft experienced a burst of flak which caused the propeller of engine
number three to become uncontrollable and resulted in a fire near engine
number four while on the final bomb run. Despite this, he continued on the
bomb run and released his bombs, with considerable accuracy.
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits copies of his flight
records, the original DFC recommendation, a statement from his Senator, a
proposed citation, a 1965 statement from the former group commander, a
statement from a fellow pilot involved in the mission, and a statement from
his former squadron commander.
The former squadron commander states that three days after the mission he
drafted a proposed DFC citation to recognize the applicant for his
extraordinary achievement during the mission; however, he relinquished
command and transferred command to a new duty station shortly after the
mission.
In his 1965 statement, the former group commander indicates that in view of
the number of missions that he had flown and the information contained in
the copy of the citation which he provided, he would have approved a
recommendation for the DFC for his achievement during the 16 February 1945
mission.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is a retired Regular Air Force colonel, who is a former
member of the Army Air Corps, who served in the European Theatre of
Operation from 22 April 1944 to 15 August 1945, as a B-24 pilot assigned to
the 759th Bombardment Squadron, 459th Bombardment Group, Fifteenth Air
Force. During this period, he completed a total of 21 combat missions,
totaling 240 combat hours, participating in the Europe Air Combat, North
Appennies, Po Valley, and Rome-Arno campaigns. He was awarded three Air
Medals for sustained operational activities against the enemy. In
addition, he was also awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received in
action against the enemy on 28 February 1945.
The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded for
heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight.
The Air Force Decoration Board, Secretary of the Air Force Personnel
Counsel, received a similar request under the provisions of Section 526, of
the Fiscal Year 1996 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and would
not consider the request, as there was no approval of the recommendation
from someone in the applicant’s chain of command.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting award of the DFC. In this
respect, we note the evidence of record and the documentation provided in
support of this appeal indicates the applicant was originally recommended
for award of the DFC for his actions on 16 February 1945 three days after
the mission; however, he was shot down nine days later and interned as a
Prisoner-of-War (POW) until May 1945. Moreover, shortly after the mission
the recommending official (squadron commander), relinquished command and
transferred to a new duty station. In 1965, the former group commander
reviewed a copy of the original 1945 recommendation package and indicated
that he would have approved the recommendation for the applicant’s
achievement during the 16 February 1945 mission as a first pilot, in view
of the number of missions he flew and the information contained in the
proposed citation. While there is no evidence to indicate that during the
period in question, the Fifteenth Air Force awarded the DFC for sustained
operational activities, i.e., number of missions completed, as did other
numbered Air Forces, in view of the 1965 statement from the former group
commander, we find the applicant has met his burden of proving the
recommendation was approved by someone in his chain-of-command. While we
are unable to determine what previous action was taken in response to this
statement in 1965, we find no basis to question the decision of his former
group commander as to the appropriate level of recognition for his actions
on 16 February 1945. Therefore, we recommend his records be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issue(s) involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Distinguished
Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement on 16 February 1945, in aerial
flight as a pilot of a B-24 aircraft in the European Theater of Operations.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-01224
in Executive Session on 27 May 2010, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Vice Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Mar 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Vice Chair
AFBCMR BC-2010-01224
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXX, be corrected to show that he was awarded the
Distinguished Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement on 16 February
1945, in aerial flight as a pilot of a B-24 aircraft in the European
Theater of Operations.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02052
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02052 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal. In 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00357
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00357 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Aug 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and an additional oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal (AM). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073
The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00510
He was never awarded an additional AM for his 26th through 30th combat missions In support of the appeal, applicant submits a statement from the former 67th Deputy Squadron Navigator recommending him for award of the DFC and an additional oak leaf cluster to the AM, and a list of his combat missions. The DFC was established by Congress on 2 July 1926 and is awarded for heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01548
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01548 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 November 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded two oak leaf clusters to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and three additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In view of the above,...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00420
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: In view of his completion of a total of 37 combat missions and based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding an AM upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions and awarding a DFC upon the completion of 35 combat missions, he should be awarded the DFC and an additional AM. In view of the above, and since the applicant never received a DFC for his completion of a combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00386
AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM or DFC based solely on the number of combat missions completed, but rather for acts of heroism in combat flight or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. Applicant’s records do not indicate he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03794
In BC-2004-02294, the AFBCMR awarded a DFC to an applicant who had also completed more than the required ten missions as a lead navigator and an additional oak leaf cluster for completion of a tour of 32 combat missions. AFPC/DPPPR states, in part, that although the applicant’s records indicate that he completed a total of 35 combat missions and he has submitted a DFC recommendation signed by his former commander, in 1946, General “Hap” Arnold ordered theater commanders not to award the AM...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01247
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01247 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXX (DECEASED) COUNSEL: DR ASTON HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 OCT 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased husband’s records be corrected to show he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and awarded the Air Medal (AM) with five Oak Leaf Clusters...