RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00326
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive service credit for the period April 2008 through
June 2010 due to ongoing medical treatment for a service-
connected injury.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
1. He should have been retained on active duty orders until the
doctors and the Air Force could come to terms on what to do
(surgery). He knows this was supposed to take place before
relieving him from service.
2. He has been trying to go through all avenues at the unit
level but no one can get him a straight answer, it was always
wait.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of AF
Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Physical
Evaluation Board (PEB); AF IMT 618, Medical Board Report; AF
Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; AF Form 422, Physical
Profile Serial Report; AF IMT 348, Line of Duty Determination,
and medical records.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant deployed in support of Operation IRAQI FREEDOM
from 10 May 2007 to 15 October 2007 with orders extended through
15 October 2007. During the deployment, he sustained a lower
back injury and was placed on active duty continuation orders
(medical hold) from 16 October 2007 to 16 December 2007. His
orders were later extended through 15 April 2008.
On 16 October 2007, a Line of Duty (LOD) determination was
initiated due to lower back pain from pushing concrete T-walls
during his deployment and on 12 August 2008, his injury was
found to be ILOD.
On 2 July 2009, the applicants records met a Medical Evaluation
Board (MEB) for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine.
The MEB recommended the applicant be referred to an Informal
Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB).
On 19 August 2009, the IPEB found the applicant unfit and
recommended his discharge with severance pay with a disability
rating of 20 percent. In December 2009, he waived his election
to demand a formal hearing for the purpose of concurring with
the IPEBs recommendation and findings.
On 11 January 2010, officials within the Office of the Secretary
of the Air Force (SAF) determined the applicant was physically
unfit for continued military service and directed an honorable
discharge with severance pay. However, since he had 20 years of
satisfactory service, he had the option to transfer to the
Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) for the purpose of
retirement in lieu of discharge with severance pay. The
applicant elected to be discharged with severance pay as
provided under Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 61, Section 1203.
Per ARPC/DPTTR, on 12 August 2010, the applicant declined
severance pay and applied for retirement to be effective on
22 June 2010.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C, D and F.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PS recommends denial. A1PS states the applicant is asking
for service credit for the period April 2008 to June 2010 and is
claiming he should have been retained on active duty during this
period. A thorough review of the documentation provided failed
to validate that he was unable to perform military duties during
this period.
The complete A1PS evaluations are at Exhibits C and D.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the record be corrected
to reflect the applicant was on active duty status (medical
hold) from 16 April 2008 through 11 January 2010 to coincide
with its final determination and the transfer order to Inactive
Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) for the purpose of
retirement in lieu of discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant
states, from April 2008 through June 2010, clinical notes
indicate the applicant was actively receiving care and had
significant duty limiting restrictions. More specifically, a
duty limiting condition report (AF Form 469) on 1 May 2009
detailed significant duty limiting restrictions which were
clearly inconsistent with functional capabilities of his duty
requirements. The IPEB found the applicant unfit and
recommended discharge with severance at 20 percent disability
rating for chronic low back pain with degenerative joint-disease
at L3-L5. The applicant subsequently waived his right for a
Formal PEB and agreed with the IPEB recommendations. While
additional care was received after acceptance of the IPEB
recommendation, there is no conclusive evidence that the
applicant's condition worsened or a significant change in
treatment course was instituted. More importantly, the
applicant waived the request for a Formal PEB on 4 December 2009
and elected to be discharged with severance pay as provided
under Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 61, Section 1203. Therefore, the
BCMR Medical Consultant opines the applicant's concurrence with
the findings of the IPEB and subsequent waiving of a hearing
before the formal PEB constituted sufficient acknowledgement of
his status as unfit for continued military service. In
addition, due to the active course of treatment and therapeutic
interventions which occurred throughout the board review
process, the reviewer recommends extension of his active duty
status from 16 April 2008 through 11 January 2010 to coincide
with its final determination and the transfer order to ISLRS for
purpose of retirement in lieu of discharge.
The complete BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at
Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANTS REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE ADVISORY:
The applicant responded by stating he agrees with the BCMR
Medical Consultant recommendation. He also provides
clarification to some points made in the Medical Consultant
advisory.
The applicants complete response is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
corrective action. The applicant requests he receive service
credit for the period April 2008 through June 2010 with back pay
due to his ongoing medical treatment for a service connected
injury. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and
the applicant's submission, we believe relief is warranted. In
this respect, the applicant was on active duty orders in support
of Operation Iraqi Freedom and sustained an injury to his back as
a result of pushing concrete T-walls. Subsequently, the injury
was found to be In the Line of Duty (ILOD). However, contrary to
established guidance dictating that he remain on an active status
until processed through the disability evaluation system, it
appears he was released from active duty without due process. As
such, we believe the applicant has suffered an injustice. With
respect to his request for clarification of the service dates
contained in the BCMR Medical Consultants advisory opinion, the
available records reflect the applicant entered active duty on
23 July 1979 and was honorably discharged on 24 October 1987.
His NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service
reflects that he entered the Air National Guard on 21 August 1988
and was discharged 21 June 2010. In view of the above, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the BCMR Medical
Consultant and recommend that the applicant be continued on
active duty status from 16 April 2008 through 11 January 2010.
Accordingly, we recommend his record be corrected as indicated
below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was not
released from active duty on 15 April 2008, but was continued on
active duty until 11 January 2010.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-00326 in Executive Session on 3 November 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Acting Panel Chair
Member
Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-00326 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 January 2011,
w/atchs.
Exhibit B. NGB/A1PS, Letter, dated 29 March 2011,
w/atchs.
Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS, Letter, dated 28 March 2011
w/atchs.
Exhibit D. NGB/A1PS, Letter, dated 2 June 2011.
Exhibit E. SAF/MRBR, Letter, dated 17 June 2011.
Exhibit F. BCMR Medical Consultant, Letter, dated
12 September 2011.
Exhibit G. SAF/MRBC, Letter, dated 7 October 2011.
Exhibit H Applicants Rebuttal, Letter, dated
19 October 2011.
Acting Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00444
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00444 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show that he was medically retired from the Air Force on 8 June 2007 due to a back injury considered in the line of duty (ILOD). On 28 March 2006, he had requested an LOD determination for a lower...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02683 1
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should not have been discharged from active duty with unresolved medical issues and a Line of Duty (LOD) determination should have been initiated prior to his release from active duty. Although the applicant stated he received treatment for his medical conditions while he was on active orders, he has only provided subjective evidence following his release from active duty. If the applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02498
The applicant's complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicants request to change the record to reflect that he was medically retired. The Medical Consultant found no nexus between the applicants ILOD injury of 1999 and his chronic lumbar condition, and noted a lack of evidence to demonstrate a chronic impediment to duty specifically due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01103
He receive military pay and Air National Guard (ANG) retirement points for the periods of time requested above. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit H. On 11 Mar 14, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration, reiterating that he sustained a shoulder injury while serving on active duty due to being electrocuted when...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02147
________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends approval, noting the applicants record should be amended to reflect, as a minimum, the applicant was placed on active duty orders for pay and points on 5 Mar 11 and remained so until his medical retirement effective 29 Aug 12. The applicants request is duly noted; however, we did not find the evidence provided substantial enough to override the opinions...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC 2008 00563
Another AF Form 388 was accomplished on 7 November 2004 and found the lesion ILOD. The evidence of record is unclear as to why it took unit officials some 18 months to accomplish an AF Form 388 indicating the applicants injuries suffered in March 2003 as ILOD. It appears the applicant continued to serve beyond his demobilization date thereby indicating he was somewhat fit for duty and not necessarily eligible for continuation on active duty for the time frame he is asking for.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01247
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3212, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, and Separation, paragraph 4.5, states that members undergoing an MEB must not be retired, discharged, or released from active duty for any reason until notification is received from the Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF). The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03992
In this respect, we note the applicant was on active duty orders in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM and was diagnosed with a medical injury. While the applicant requests continuation of his active duty orders for the period 18 Jun 11 to 9 Sep 11, we concur with the recommendation of AFMOA/SGHI to correct the record to reflect the applicant was retained on active duty orders for the period 19 Jun 11 to 27 Jul 11. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01985
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a 21-page brief from counsel, with attachments; copies of NGB Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, issued in conjunction with her 21 Feb 11 transfer to the Retired Reserve; DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with her 23 Feb 11 release from active duty; Reserve Order EK-2605, retirement order, dated 16 Feb 11, and various other documents associated with her request. It...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01157
On 18 May 2011, NGB/A1PS found the applicant medically disqualified for worldwide duty for sleep apnea and requested a fitness evaluation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/SGPA recommends denial of the applicants request for a medical retirement. Furthermore, the applicant was diagnosed with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome in 2010 by the DVA but there is no documentation to support any service connected aggravation.